Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/604,692

BENDABLE DETECTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Priority
Mar 23, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0038119
Examiner
GUTIERREZ, GISSELLE M
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Vieworks Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
332 granted / 412 resolved
+12.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
424
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.4%
-28.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 412 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species 9 in the reply filed on 08/18/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that are merely different mechanical implementations (e.g., sliding rails, hinges, or pins) designed to achieve the same functional goal defined in generic claim 1. This is not found persuasive because each of the species are independent and distinct as shown by the individual different embodiments as also shown in the different figures for each embodiment. Additionally, there is a patentable difference between the species as claimed and there would be a serious search and/or examination burden on the examiner if restriction is not required. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jadrich (US 2020/0064501; February 27, 2020). Regarding claim 1, Jadrich teaches a bendable detector comprising: a first housing (Figure 5A Element 505 – extended rigid section) comprising a control unit (Paragraph 34 -may be configured to at least partially enclose a replaceable battery 501, in addition to a radio transceiver 502 and antenna 503 for wireless operation of the flexible and bendable detector 500 as described herein, such as for transmitting image data of captured radiographic images. ) therein and made of an inelastic material or a material having higher rigidity than a material of a second housing (Paragraph 34- an extended rigid section 505); the second housing comprising a detection panel therein and made of an elastic material or composite material including an elastic material and an inelastic material ( a flexible radiographic detector disclosed herein, FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a flexible detector 300 having a two-dimensional photosensor array; Paragraph 27 - housing components such as front and rear laminate covers 333, 334, respectively, and two conformable, flexible, parallel side walls 329 that are parallel to the flexible y axis. ); and a connection mechanism having a connection (Figure 6B Element 603 – tethered type connector; Paragraph 35)structure configured to couple the first housing and the second housing so that the first housing and the second housing are separable (Paragraph 35 a radiographic detector 600 shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, similar in most respects to the detector 300, 400, 500, embodiments described herein, except that the digital & power PCB 317 is moved off-detector into a separate control and power module 601 that is interfaced to the detector's array section disposed in a bendable image sensor module 605, through a tethered type connector 603. ). Regarding claim 2, Jadrich teaches the bendable detector of claim 1. Jadrich further teaches comprising: a first connector provided on a first opposing surface of the first housing (Seen in Figure 6A and 6B – connecter from 601); and a second connector provided on a second opposing surface of the second housing and configured to be connected to the first connector (Seen in Figure Figure 6A and 6B – Connector from 605). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jadrich (US 2020/0064501; February 27, 2020) in view of Wulff (US 20040115994 A1; June 17, 2004) Regarding claim 3, Jadrich teaches the bendable detector of claim 2. Jadrich does not teach wherein any one of the first and second connectors is a connector having a pogo pin, and the other of the first and second connectors is a connector to which the pogo pin is connected. Wulff teaches wherein any one of the first and second connectors is a connector having a pogo pin (Figure 5 Element 502; Paragraph 37 - In this preferred embodiment, the male connector 502 includes pin contacts 506 of a pogo style (e.g., a compressible recoilable spring probe or plunger) assembled in a predetermined arrangement within a plastic housing block 508.), and the other of the first and second connectors is a connector to which the pogo pin is connected (Figure 500 Element 512; Paragraph 37- The system 500 includes both a male connector 502 and a female connector 504, each having an arrangement of electrically conductive contacts manufactured therein suitable for making an appropriate electrical connection according to the particular application.). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the bendable detector of Jadrich with the pogo connector of Wulff. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this in order to provide increase security and stability of the connection between the housings. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jadrich (US 2020/0064501; February 27, 2020) in view of Makoto (US 20100258730 A1; October 14, 2010). Regarding claim 18, Jadrich teaches the bendable detector of any one of claims 1, but does not teach wherein the connection mechanism is a ninth connection mechanism comprising: a sliding groove provided in a lower portion of the first housing and formed in a longitudinal direction; and a sliding rail provided on an upper portion of the second housing and formed in the longitudinal direction, the sliding rail conforming to the sliding groove so that the sliding rail is slidably inserted into the sliding groove. Makoto teaches wherein the connection mechanism is a ninth connection mechanism comprising: a sliding groove (Figure 24 Element 622/632) provided in a lower portion of the first housing and formed in a longitudinal direction (Seen in Figure 24 ; Paragraph 194 - It is also possible to arrange such a configuration, as shown in FIG. 24, that the cover bodies 621, 631 of the cover members 62, 63 are provided with grooves 622 and 632, and each opening end of the housing body 61 is equipped with an insertion section 611 as an engagement device. This insertion section 611 is inserted into the grooves 622, 632, whereby the cover members 62, 63 and housing body 61 are engaged with each other. ); and a sliding rail (Figure 24 Element 611 -insertion section in a ) provided on an upper portion of the second housing and formed in the longitudinal direction, the sliding rail conforming to the sliding groove so that the sliding rail is slidably inserted into the sliding groove (Seen in Figure 24; Paragraph 194 - It is also possible to arrange such a configuration, as shown in FIG. 24, that the cover bodies 621, 631 of the cover members 62, 63 are provided with grooves 622 and 632, and each opening end of the housing body 61 is equipped with an insertion section 611 as an engagement device. This insertion section 611 is inserted into the grooves 622, 632, whereby the cover members 62, 63 and housing body 61 are engaged with each other.). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the bendable detector of Jadrich with the groove and rail connection of Makoto. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this in order to provide increase security and stability of the connection between the housings. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jadrich (US 2020/0064501; February 27, 2020) in view of Makoto (US 20100258730 A1; October 14, 2010) in view of Kim (KR1020140147594; June 20, 2013). Regarding claim 19, Jadrich in view of Makoto teaches the bendable detector of claim 18, but does not teach wherein the ninth connection mechanism further comprises: a guide hole provided in the first housing and formed in a direction intersecting the sliding groove; a locking member having one end elastically supported by an elastic member inserted into the guide hole, and the other end inserted into a insertion groove provided in the sliding rail; and a locking adjustment device connected to the locking member and configured to move the locking member while moving along an operating space provided in the first housing. Kim teaches wherein the ninth connection mechanism further comprises: a guide hole (Figure 6 Element 114 - the receiving portion 114 of the housing 110) provided in the first housing (Figure 6 Element 110) and formed in a direction intersecting the sliding groove (Figure 6 Central Opening of Element 110; Paragraph 37-40); a locking member (Figure 6 Element 130 - The hook members 130 are respectively disposed in the receiving portions 114 ) having one end elastically supported by an elastic member (Figure 6 Element 140 - The elastic member 140 ) inserted into the guide hole (Figure 6 Element 114 - the receiving portion 114 of the housing 110), and the other end inserted into a insertion groove (Figure 6 Element 133-A first latching protrusion 133 is formed at an end portion facing the insertion groove 111 ) provided in the sliding rail (Paragraph 37-40); and a locking adjustment (Figure 4 Element 120 - Meanwhile, when the hook member (130) moves in the unlocking direction within the insertion part of the housing (110) due to the movement of the handle (120),) device connected to the locking member and configured to move the locking member while moving along an operating space provided in the first housing (Paragraph 64 - Meanwhile, when the hook member (130) moves in the unlocking direction within the insertion part of the housing (110) due to the movement of the handle (120),). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the bendable detector of Jadrich in view of Makoto with locking mechanism of Kim. A person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to do this in order to provide increase security and stability of the connection between the housings that allows for sliding locking and unlocking. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -US 20100072379 A1 teaches a bendable detector. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GISSELLE GUTIERREZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4672. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uzma Alam can be reached at 571-272-3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GISSELLE GUTIERREZ/ Examiner Art Unit 2884 /UZMA ALAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730236
DETECTOR MODULE FOR AN X-RAY DETECTOR HAVING A HEATING LAYER
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723923
HEAT SOURCE DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12693214
HYBRID MASS-ALPHA SPECTROMETRY FOR HIGH RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687489
PROBE AND INSPECTION APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689018
PROCESS AND ARRANGEMENT FOR PRODUCTION OF AN ELECTRODE SUSPENSION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 412 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month