Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/604,841

REQUEST BASED REDUNDANCY AND EARLY TERMINATION FOR OUTER CODING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
ROBERTS, BRIAN S
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
620 granted / 730 resolved
+26.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
751
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§103
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 730 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In reference to claims 1-5, 14-17 The language “in any combination” in claim 1, line 5 renders the claim indefinite because the scope of the claim is unclear. The language “in any combination” implies any combination with anything rendering the scope of the claim indefinite. The Examiner recommends overcoming the rejection by amending “the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is” to --the at least one processor is--. Claims 2-5 and 14-17 contain similar language as claim 1 and are similarly rejected. The Examiner recommends overcoming the rejections by amending “the at least one processor, individually or in any combination, is” to --the at least one processor is--. In reference to claims 6-13 Claims 6-13 are rejected because they depend on a rejected parent claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-20 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure are: US 2025/0247740 pertains to transmitting device applies a FEC encoding scheme (e.g., Raptor, RaptorQ, Reed-Solomon codes, 2D parity codes) according to the AL-FEC configuration (e.g., FECFRAME Configuration Information) to generate a numerical quantity of repair symbols that make up repair data packets or redundant data packets. US 2024/0014932 pertains to receiving, from a base station via a radio resource control (RRC) signaling, information indicating a number N of code block groups per transport block (TB), wherein a code block group comprises at least one code block, receiving, from the base station, control information scheduling data, receiving, from the base station, the data on a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) based on the control information, the data including code block groups of a TB, generating hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) feedback information for the code block groups of the TB, the code block groups of the TB being identified based on a number of code blocks (CBs) for the TB and the number N of code block groups per TB, and transmitting the HARQ feedback information to the base station, wherein a bit size of the transmitted HARQ feedback information is identical to the number N of the code block group per TB. US 2018/0254870 pertains to encoding scheme for the PSDU. An input bit stream may be optionally encoded with the Reed-Solomon coding. The parameters of the Reed-Solomon coding may comprise [k+8,k,9]. Thus, K symbols, each consisting of 6 bits are encoded by a Reed-Solomon encoder. The Reed-Solomon encoder adds 8 parity symbols (again each 6 bits). US 2024/0187934 pertains to confirming a maximum data rate supported by the terminal; confirming an instant data rate on the basis of the number of slots corresponding to one transport block (TB); confirming whether or not the maximum data rate satisfies the condition of being equal to or greater than the instant data rate; and transmitting or receiving data on the basis of whether or not the condition is satisfied. US 2017/0195082 pertains to performing code block segmentation for wireless transmission using concatenated forward error correction encoding includes receiving a transport block of data for transmission having a transport block size, along with one or more parameters that define a target code rate. A number N of inner code blocks needed to transmit the transport block is determined. A number M—outer code blocks may be calculated based on the number of inner code blocks and on encoding parameters for the outer code blocks. The transport block may then be segmented and encoded according to the calculated encoding parameters. US 10177784 pertains to packet transmission method of the present invention includes acquiring a source payload including partial source symbols from a source block, generating a source packet including the source payload and an identifier (ID) of the source payload, generating a repair packet including a repair payload corresponding to the source payload and an ID of the repair payload, generating a Forward Error Correction (FEC) packet block including the source and repair packets, and transmitting the FEC packet block. The source payload ID includes a source payload sequence number incrementing by 1 per source packet. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN S ROBERTS whose telephone number is (571)272-3095. The examiner can normally be reached M to F, 9am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at (571) 272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRIAN S. ROBERTS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2466 /BRIAN S ROBERTS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604254
FORWARDING-CAPABLE NETWORK ENTITY RECONFIGURATION RATE CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598536
MONITORING PROCEDURE FOR RELAY PATH SCENARIOS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598533
WLAN CELLULAR AGGREGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593255
TAG MAINTENANCE, UPDATE, AND SIGNALING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593261
METHODS FOR INTER IAB-DONOR-DU BAP TUNNELING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 730 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month