Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/604,876

REED AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 14, 2024
Examiner
LOCKETT, KIMBERLY R
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yamaha Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
969 granted / 1172 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1197
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
46.0%
+6.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1172 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2022004310A1. Regarding claim 1, WO 2022004310A1 discloses a reed (1) for a, the reed for a wood wind musical instrument comprising: a plurality of plastic sheets (9,10) laminated in a lamination direction perpendicular to a longitudinal direction of the reed (the Y and Z directions in figure 6), wherein an elastic modulus in a longitudinal direction of at least one plastic sheet of the plurality of plastic sheets (9,10) is greater than an elastic modulus in a direction perpendicular to both the lamination direction and the longitudinal direction of the at least one plastic sheet (“wherein the ratio of the modulus of elasticity in the longitudinal direction to the modulus of elasticity in the width direction is 2 or more; )(See the width direction Z that is perpendicular to the laminate direction Y and the longitudinal direction X; and as recited the laminated body 20 is a uniform anisotropic, and orthogonal anisotropy is defines materials having properties that differ along different axis’, and different resins). WO2022004310A1 does not disclose the use of an aerophone. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to modify the device as disclosed in WO 2022004310A1 to be used in the reed of an aerophone since reeds are known components in aerophones. Regarding claim 2, WO 2022004310A1 discloses wherein the elastic modulus in the longitudinal direction of the at least one plastic sheet is equal to or greater than 1.1 times and equal to or less than 2.0 times the elastic modulus in a short direction of at least one plastic sheet (see figure 6 where, the width (z direction) is the short direction of the reed, being shorter than the longitudinal direction) . Regarding claim 3, WO 2022004310A1 discloses wherein the elastic modulus in the longitudinal direction of the reed is equal to or greater than 1.1 times and equal to or less than 2.0 times the elastic modulus in a short direction of the reed (see figure 6 where, the width (z direction) is the short direction in the reed, being shorter than t the longitudinal direction). Regarding claim 4, WO 2022004310A1 discloses wherein, the at least one plastic sheet of the plurality of plastic sheets comprises a first layer (9) and a second layer (10) adjacent to the first layer in the lamination direction; and an anisotropy of an elastic modulus of the first layer is different from an anisotropy of an elastic modulus of the second layer (see the width direction Z that is perpendicular to the laminated direction Y and the longitudinal direction X; and as recited the laminated body 20 is a uniform anisotropic, and orthogonal anisotropy is defined as materials having properties and values that differ when measured along different directions and axis’). Regarding claim 5, WO 2022004310A1 discloses wherein the lamination direction is a same direction as a short direction of the reed (see the Y direction in figure 6) . Regarding claim 2, WO 2022004310A1 discloses wherein the laminated direction is a direction perpendicular to both the longitudinal direction of the reed and the short direction of the reed (see the Y direction, the longitudinal direction, the X direction where the Z direction is the short direction and is shorter than the longitudinal direction, see figure 6). Regarding claim 12, WO 2022004310A1 discloses a plastic sheet (9,10) for a reed, wherein the plastic sheet has an elastic modulus in a longitudinal direction of the plastic sheet is equal to or greater than 1.1 times and equal to or less than 2.0 times the elastic modulus in a short (width) direction of the plastic sheet, wherein the longitudinal direction of the plastic sheet is a same direction as a longitudinal direction of the reed, and the reed is formed by laminating a plurality of plastic sheets (9,10) (see figure 6 where, the width (z direction) is the short direction of the reed, being shorter than the longitudinal direction). Claims 7- 11 are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIMBERLY R LOCKETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2067. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at 571-270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIMBERLY R LOCKETT/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603070
Speed Reducing Instrument Tuner and Assemblies Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603069
FRETBOARD GUARD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603072
Easy Application Harmonica Holder
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597404
PORTABLE GRAVITY-GRIP MUSICAL INSTRUMENT STAND
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592213
TAP GUITAR PICK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1172 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month