Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/606,061

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING REFERENCE SIGNALS FOR POSITIONING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, PABLO N
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
548 granted / 656 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 656 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 6, 11, and 16, the claims limitations, “wherein each of the plurality of SRS configurations comprises at least one respective physical cell identity (PCI) and at least one respective new radio (NR) cell global identifier (CGI)”, have render the claim indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In accordance within the specification (see 0052, “each NG-RAN node can reply/respond to the LMF with SRS configurations including PCIs or NR cell global identifiers NCGIs”) the SRS configurations include either PCIs or NR cell global identifiers NCGIs but not both. Appropriate correction require. Dependent claims 2-5, 7-10, 12-15, and 17-20 are reject for the same reasoning. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS (HUAWEI: "(TP to BL CR for TS 38.455) Completion of NRPPa", 3GPP DRAFT; R3-204969, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP), MOBILE COMPETENCE CENTRE ; 650, ROUTE DES LUCIOLES ; F-06921 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS CEDEX ; FRANCE, vol. RAN WG3, no. E-meeting; 20200817 - 20200828 6 August 2020 (2020-08-06), XP052398038). As per claim 1, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed a wireless communication method, comprising receiving, by a location management function (LMF) from a wireless communication node, a positioning information response that comprises a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) configurations (see annex A, section 8.2.x.2; discussion, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2,z11); wherein each of the plurality of SRS configurations comprises at least one respective physical cell identity (PCI) and at least one respective new radio (NR) cell global identifier (CGI) (discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d). As per claims 2, 7, 12, and 17, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed the wireless communication node sends to a wireless communication device, a first message indicating a plurality of Sounding Reference Signal (SRS) aggregates, wherein each of the plurality of SRS aggregates is associated with a cell identifier, and receives, from the wireless communication device, an SRS according to at least one of the SRS aggregates (see annex A, section 9.1.x.1; discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2.z11). As per claims 3, 8, 13, and 18, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed the SRS aggregates each includes an SRS configuration(see annex A, section 9.1.x.1; discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2.z11). As per claims, 4, 9, 14, and 19, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed the first message further indicates a cell list containing the cell identifiers of the plurality of SRS aggregates (se annex A, section 8.2.x.2; discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2.z11). As per claims 5, 10, 15, and 20, w Sophia-Antipolis disclosed a wireless communication device associates an on-demand request with a positioning reference signal (PRS) index list for a positioning method corresponding to a PRS configuration (see annex A, section 9.1.x.1; discussion, section 9.2.xx1, section 9.2.bb, section 9.2.z6, section 9.2.y). As per claim 6, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed a wireless communication method, comprising transmitting, by a wireless communication node to a location management function (LMF), a positioning information response that comprises a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) configurations (see annex A, section 8.2.x.2; discussion, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2,z11); wherein each of the plurality of SRS configurations comprises at least one respective physical cell identity (PCI) and at least one respective new radio (NR) cell global identifier (CGI) (discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d). As per claim 11, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed a location management function (LMF), comprising at least one processor configured to receive, via a receiver from a wireless communication node, a positioning information response that comprises a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) configurations (see annex A, section 8.2.x.2; discussion, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2,z11); wherein each of the plurality of SRS configurations comprises at least one respective physical cell identity (PCI) and at least one respective new radio (NR) cell global identifier (CGI) (discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d). As per claim 16, Sophia-Antipolis disclosed a wireless communication node, comprising: at least one processor configured to transmit, via a transceiver to a location management function (LMF), a positioning information response that comprises a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) configurations (see annex A, section 8.2.x.2; discussion, section 9.1.1.d, section 9.2,z11); wherein each of the plurality of SRS configurations comprises at least one respective physical cell identity (PCI) and at least one respective new radio (NR) cell global identifier (CGI) (discussion, section 9.2.y, section 9.1.1.d). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Pablo Tran whose telephone number is (571)272-7898. The examiner normal hours are 9:30 -5:00 (Monday-Friday). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Jinsong Hu, can be reached at (571)272-3965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571)273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) System. Status information for Published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see httpr//pair-directauspto.gov. Should You have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (in USA or CANADA) or 571-272-1000. February 16, 2026 /PABLO N TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592724
RADIO FREQUENCY CIRCUIT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581432
MAXIMUM POWER REDUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12567875
Coupling Mitigation for Coextensive Signal Paths with Resonant Matching Networks
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557041
CONTROLLING NETWORK PARTICIPANTS TO SELECT RADIO POWER LEVELS THAT BEST SERVE THE NETWORK AND INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12543124
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING POWER HEADROOM REPORT FOR MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION RECEPTION POINTS IN NEXT GENERATION MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+2.8%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 656 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month