Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/606,116

Audio Signal Processing Method, Apparatus, and Audio Signal Processing System

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Priority
Sep 17, 2021 — JP 2021-152271 +2 more
Examiner
LAEKEMARIAM, YOSEF K
Art Unit
2691
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Yamaha Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
806 granted / 977 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
89.0%
+49.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 977 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 1.The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 2.Claim(s) 1, 4-8, 11 and 14-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sogabe et al. (JP 2001036880) in view of Hashimoto et al. (US 20230308831). Regarding claims 1 and 11, Sogabe discloses an audio signal processing method used in an audio signal processing system including a plurality of terminals that output an audio signal (Paragraphs: 0005 and 0045: Sogabe discusses how an audio information transmit from and the stereo audio signal to the personal computers 2b to 2e in each conference room), the method comprises: obtaining localization control information that determines an acoustic image localization position of an own terminal in the audio signal processing system (Paragraphs: 0015, 0019 and 0030: Sogabe discusses how the signal is processed by sound image localization device 16 so that the sound image is localized at a different specific position in each of conference rooms; and how the stereo audio signal whose sound image has been localized at a specific position in the first conference room by the sound image localization device based on the communicated position information); performing localization processing on the audio signal of the own terminal, based on the obtained localization control information (Paragraph:0019, 0030 and 0045: the signal processed by sound image localization device); and outputting the audio signal on which the localization processing has been performed (Paragraphs: 0020-0021: Sogabe discusses how the voice signal of speaker A is played back by the right speaker and the left speaker, and the signal is processed so that the sound image is localized at point P1, which is in the center in front of the listener). Sogabe discloses the invention set forth above but does not specifically mentioning “processing on the audio signal of the own terminal” Sogabe however discloses personal computers 2a to 2e that are terminal devices (Sogabe: Paragraphs: 0045 and 0047). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to interpret the personal computers which are also a terminal devices as “own terminal” that can process the audio signal, thus allowing to exchanges audio information as stereo signals, and is characterized in that the stereo signals are sent out with different sound image localization positions depending on the respective conference rooms, and the playback system as disclosed by Sogabe. Sogabe discloses the invention set forth above but does not specifically point out “the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal” Hashimoto discloses a system wherein the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal (Paragraphs: 0011, 0174 and 0063: Hashimoto discusses how the sound image localization processing unit of the control unit performs the sound image localization processing on a sound content to be output or generate according to the position of the target (that is, the direction of the user terminal determined from terminals identifier information) of the user; and how the sound image localization processing unit can grasp absolute positions of a plurality of user terminals and generate audio information obtained by performing sound image localization on the position of the virtual sound source. Hashimoto also discusses how a position information acquisition unit configured to acquire pieces of position information of the plurality of user terminals; and a terminal identification information is not limited to the terminal ID, and includes information that can uniquely identify the terminal). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Sogabe, and modify a system wherein the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal, as taught by Hashimoto, thus the position information indicating a position where the content information is provided in association with each other, as discussed by Hashimoto. Considering claims 4 and 14, Hashimoto discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 1 and 11, wherein the identification information is unique identification information of each terminal (Paragraphs: 0063 and 0168 Hashimoto discusses uniquely identify the terminal; and how the identification information that uniquely identifies a group is assigned to each group, and a plurality of user IDs, a plurality of user terminal IDs, and the like). Considering claims 5 and 15, Sogabe discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 4 and 14, wherein: the plurality of terminals output a video signal; and the identification information is included in the video signal (Paragraphs: 0012, 0030, 0043: Sogabe discusses exchanging video information along with audio information, as in the electronic conferencing system; and how the system sends out stereo signals with different sound image localization positions depending on the conference room, and a playback system that plays back the above audio information from each conference room in its own conference room). Considering claims 6 and 16, Sogabe discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 1 and 11, wherein the localization control information is generated based on an attribute of a user of each terminal (Paragraphs: 0011-0013: Sogabe discusses communicating/sending stereo signals with different sound image localization positions depending on the conference room, and a playback system) Considering claims 7 and 17, Sogabe discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 1 and 11, further comprising: obtaining space information that shows an acoustic space (Paragraph: 0031: Sogabe discusses how the central processing unit receives the image signals with the respective location information added in the second to fifth conference rooms); and processing to add an indirect sound corresponding to the acoustic space shown by the space information, on the audio signal of the terminal (Paragraphs: 0011 and 0044: Sogabe discusses a conferencing system that compresses and sends out audio information from each conference room, receives compressed audio information sent from other conference rooms, expands it, and plays back the audio information in its own conference room). Considering claims 8 and 18, Sogabe discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 7 and 17, further comprising: generating a first audio signal to which the indirect sound is added (Paragraphs: 0011 and 0044: Sogabe discusses a conferencing system that compresses and sends out audio information from each conference room, receives compressed audio information sent from other conference rooms, expands it, and plays back the audio information in its own conference room), and a second audio signal to which the indirect sound is not added (Paragraphs: 0026 and 0047-0048: removing only the audio information of the conference room that has its own sound image localized at a specific position from the audio information received from the central processing unit, and playing back the remaining audio information); and outputting each of the first audio signal and the second audio signal (Paragraph: 0048: playback system that plays back the above audio information from each conference room in its own conference room). 3.Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sogabe et al. (JP 2001036880) in view of Wang et al. (CN108198565) and further in view of in view of Hashimoto et al. (US 20230308831). Regarding claim 20, Sogabe discloses an audio signal processing system comprising: a plurality of terminals (Paragraphs: 0005 and 0045: Sogabe discusses how an audio information transmit from and the stereo audio signal to the personal computers 2b to 2e in each conference room); wherein: the plurality of terminals is configured to: obtain localization control information that determines an acoustic image localization position of the audio signal processing system (Paragraphs: 0015, 0019 and 0030: Sogabe discusses how the signal is processed by sound image localization device 16 so that the sound image is localized at a different specific position in each of conference rooms; and how the stereo audio signal whose sound image has been localized at a specific position in the first conference room by the sound image localization device based on the communicated position information), perform localization processing on the audio signal obtained by an own terminal, based on the obtained localization control information (Paragraph:0019, 0030 and 0045: the signal processed by sound image localization device), output the first audio signal on which the localization processing has been performed, to the first management device (Paragraphs: 0020-0021: Sogabe discusses how the voice signal of speaker A is played back by the right speaker and the left speaker, and the signal is processed so that the sound image is localized at point P1, which is in the center in front of the listener), Sogabe discloses the invention set forth above but does not specifically point out “a first management device; and a second management device; and output the second audio signal before the localization processing is performed, to the second management device; the first management device mixes first audio signals outputted from each of the plurality of terminals; and the second management device mixes second audio signals outputted from each of the plurality of terminals” Wang however discloses a first management device; and a second management device; and output the second audio signal before the localization processing is performed, to the second management device (Paragraphs: 0074 and 0079: Wang discusses how device 2 manages (i.e. a second management device) microphones for mixing; and how the terminal obtains multiple device identifiers that need to be mixed in an environment, generates corresponding device groups based on the device identifiers, and maps the microphones in the same device group to the same environment); the first management device mixes first audio signals outputted from each of the plurality of terminals (Paragraphs: 0040, 0074 and 0079: device 1 manages microphones for mixing (i.e. a first management device); and how the first audio signals of the multiple microphones are mixed and output); and the second management device mixes second audio signals outputted from each of the plurality of terminals (Paragraphs: 0074, 0076 and 0079: Wang discusses how the second audio signals of the microphones corresponding to the top-ranked microphone identifiers are selected and sent to the master device for mixed output). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Sogabe, and modify a system wherein a first management device; and a second management device; and output the second audio signal before the localization processing is performed, to the second management device; the first management device mixes first audio signals outputted from each of the plurality of terminals; and the second management device mixes second audio signals outputted from each of the plurality of terminals, as taught by Wang, thus allowing to reduces the impact of ambient noise on the mix and solves the problem of ambient noise having a greater impact on the mix, as discussed by Wang. Sogabe in view of Wang discloses the invention set forth above but does not specifically point out “the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal” Hashimoto discloses a system wherein the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal (Paragraphs: 0011, 0174 and 0063: Hashimoto discusses how the sound image localization processing unit of the control unit performs the sound image localization processing on a sound content to be output or generate according to the position of the target (that is, the direction of the user terminal determined from terminals identifier information) of the user; and how the sound image localization processing unit can grasp absolute positions of a plurality of user terminals and generate audio information obtained by performing sound image localization on the position of the virtual sound source. Hashimoto also discusses how a position information acquisition unit configured to acquire pieces of position information of the plurality of user terminals; and a terminal identification information is not limited to the terminal ID, and includes information that can uniquely identify the terminal). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Sogabe and Wang, and modify a system wherein the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal, as taught by Hashimoto, thus the position information indicating a position where the content information is provided in association with each other, as discussed by Hashimoto. 4.Claim(s) 2-3, and 12-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sogabe et al. (JP 2001036880) in view of Hashimoto et al. (US 20230308831) and further in view of Tsuji et al. (US 20210176581) Considering claims 2 and 12, Sogabe in view of Hashimoto fails to disclose claims 2 and 12. Tsuji however discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 2 and 12, wherein: the localization control information includes information that determines left and right localization positions; and the localization processing includes panning processing (Paragraphs: 0044 and 0255: determination of the localization position of the sound image of the sound of content for output of the left and right channels; and how it is possible to easily set the panning to localize the sound image at a specific position). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Sogabe and Hashimoto, and modify a system wherein the localization control information includes information that determines left and right localization positions; and the localization processing includes panning processing, as taught by Tsuji, thus allowing the localization position of stereo image to determined easily, as discussed by Tsuji. Considering claims 3 and 13, Tsuji further discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 1 and 11, wherein: the localization control information includes information that determines a three-dimensional localization position; and the localization processing includes binaural processing (Paragraphs: 0127 and 0129: Tsuji discusses how in the video in the three-dimensional space, it is needed to specify the localization position of the sound image; and how a three-dimensional space such as a room where the content is reproduced). 5.Claim(s) 9-10 and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sogabe et al. (JP 2001036880) in view of Hashimoto et al. (US 20230308831) and further in view of Wang et al. (CN108198565) Considering claims 9 and 19, Wang further discloses the audio signal processing method according to claims 1 and 11, further comprising: processing to add an ambient sound, on the audio signal of the terminal (Paragraphs: 0052-0053 and 0057: Wang discusses summation method to estimate the environmental noise of the current environment). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed before the effective filing date of the invention to modify the invention of Sogabe and Hashimoto, and modify a system wherein processing to add an ambient sound, on the audio signal of the terminal, as taught by Wang, thus allowing to perform smoothing processing on amplitudes corresponding to the multiple first audio signals, as discussed by Wang. Considering claim 10, Wang further discloses the audio signal processing method according to claim 9, wherein the ambient sound is different for each of the plurality of terminals (Paragraphs: 0079 and 0086: Wang discusses calculating the ambient noise of the current environment separately, without affecting each other). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicants argued, the prior arts of the record fail to disclose “the localization control information is generated based on identification information of each terminal” Examiner respectfully disagrees. The newly found art (Hashimoto et al.) discloses how the sound image localization processing unit of the control unit performs the sound image localization processing on a sound content to be output or generate according to the position of the target (that is, the direction of the user terminal determined from terminals identifier information) of the user; and how the sound image localization processing unit can grasp absolute positions of a plurality of user terminals and generate audio information obtained by performing sound image localization on the position of the virtual sound source. Hashimoto also discusses how a position information acquisition unit configured to acquire pieces of position information of the plurality of user terminals; and a terminal identification information is not limited to the terminal ID, and includes information that can uniquely identify the terminal (Hashimoto: Paragraphs: 0011, 0174 and 0063). Therefore, the prior arts of the newly found art disclose the argued claims limitation. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YOSEF K LAEKEMARIAM whose telephone number is (571)270-5149. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-6:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Duc Nguyen can be reached at (571) 272-7503. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YOSEF K. LAEKEMARIAM Primary Examiner Art Unit 2651 /YOSEF K LAEKEMARIAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 21, 2026
Response Filed
May 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682881
INTERFERENCE SOUND SUPPRESSING DEVICE, INTERFERENCE SOUND SUPPRESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING INTERFERENCE SOUND SUPPRESSING PROGRAM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677090
TELECOIL BASED VIRTUAL AUDIO JACK FOR AUDIO DEVICES
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671725
PEER TO PEER COMMUNICATION OF A REMOTE DISPLAY PROTOCOL VIA A REAL-TIME COMMUNICATION SESSION
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671790
VIDEO CHAT NFTS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659424
COMPUTING DEVICE WITH ADJUSTABLE CAMERA
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 8m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 977 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month