Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/606,349

METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A BAR PIN

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Examiner
TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3725
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Pullman Company LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
1043 granted / 1336 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1379
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
88.4%
+48.4% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1336 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-9,11-16 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Eckert (308,348) in view of Yokoo et al. (JP 07-100576). Regarding claim 1 and 13, Eckert discloses a method of forming a bar pin (Figs. 6 and 11) by deforming a metal slug (rod workpiece, A) to have spaced apart legs (B,C; Fig. 2) at an end of the rod (A) and a cavity (slot) existing between the legs (B,C) when the legs are spaced apart (a,b, Fig. 2; page 1, col. 2, lines 52-53). The bar (A) has a thickness which is a sidewall of the cavity (slot) as it is formed to become a semi-cylindrical eye between the spaced legs (B,C; Figs. 2 and 3) when the legs are bent (page 1, col. 2, lines 54-60) to overlap each other (a’,e’; Fig. 3) to close the eye by radially inwardly deforming or wherein the first and second legs are bent to define an end shape (Figs. 4 and 6) where the first and second legs meet (F; Fig. 4) for welding the seam. Eckert discloses that the spaced legs are radially inwardly deformed by a forging die (Fig. 9). Eckert discloses that the ends of bars are formed (page 1, col. 1, lines 10-15) but does not specifically recite a third and fourth leg on an opposite bar end. Yokoo teaches deforming a bar shaped connector (48; Fig. 4) by extrusion (Fig. 3) and forging (Fig. 5) to have a deformed center section (48; Fig. 4) and spaced apart first and second legs (46) on a first end (A; Fig. 4) and spaced apart third and fourth legs (B; Fig. 4) on a second opposite end ([0023], lines 1-3). Regarding claims 12 and 20, Yokoo teaches that the bar pin blank (48) is symmetrical with spaced legs (46) at opposite ends. It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to form a center section of the bar of Eckert to have a bar pin shape as taught by Yokoo so as to shape the bar into a desired center cross-sectional shape with spaced apart legs at opposite ends. Regarding claims 2 and 3, Eckert discloses a cavity (slot) existing between the legs (B,C) when the legs are spaced apart (a,b, Fig. 2; page 1, col. 2, lines 52-53). Regarding claims 4 and 14, the forging of Eckert is conducted (Fig. 9) without the slot (f) between sidewalls of the spaced apart legs being acted on by a tool. Regarding claims 5 and 15, the closed aperture (eye) of Eckert is not modified geometrically after forging (Fig. 9). Regarding claims 6 and 16, Eckert discloses that the first and second end faces of the legs (B,C) meet at the seam (F; Fig. 4) for welding. Regarding claims 7 and 8, it is an obvious duplication of leg defining and radially inwardly deforming bending steps as disclosed by Eckert to radially inwardly deform an opposite end of the bar. Regarding claim 9, the bar of Eckert (A; Fig. 1) has a longitudinal axis (A’; Fig. 1) through the middle and the legs extend parallel (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 11, Eckert discloses that the legs are bent (page 1, col. 2, lines 54-60) to overlap each other (a’,e’; Fig. 3) to close the eye by radially inwardly deforming. Claim(s) 10 and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Eckert (308,348) in view of Yokoo et al. (JP 07-100576) and further in view of Abe (3,644,973). Eckert does not disclose cold forming the rod to create a cylindrical central portion. Abe teaches (Fig. 4) cold forming a metal slug (1) in a die (3,13,23) to form a cylindrical central region (4) and an end (47; Fig. 4) which is cold formed (col. 2, lines 19-20) into a closed shape by radially inwardly deforming the end of the workpiece with a die (52; Fig. 5). It would have been obvious to the skilled artisan prior to the effective filing date of the present invention to cold form the rod of Eckert as taught by Abe in order to create a rod end that is configured to be closed by a cold forming die. Regarding claim 18, Eckert discloses that the bar (A; Fig. 1) has a longitudinal axis (A’; Fig. 1) through the middle and the legs extend parallel (Fig. 7). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWARD THOMAS TOLAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4525. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chris Templeton can be reached at 571-270-1477. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDWARD T TOLAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 08, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636697
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TWISTING WIRES
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636698
MANUFACTURING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12627107
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING CRIMP APPLICATIONS AND REPORTING POWER TOOL USAGE
3y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623264
MANUFACTURING METHOD AND MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT OF COLD-ROLLED STEEL SHEET
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617009
COLD ROLLING MILL ROLLING CONDITION SETTING METHOD, COLD ROLLING METHOD, STEEL SHEET MANUFACTURING METHOD, COLD ROLLING MILL ROLLING CONDITION SETTING DEVICE, AND COLD ROLLING MILL
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 9m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1336 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month