Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/606,466

POWER CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Priority
Sep 18, 2021 — CN 202111111304.1 +1 more
Examiner
CHERY, DADY
Art Unit
2418
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1290 granted / 1466 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1491
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1466 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4,6-14, and 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by CN113411092A (hereinafter CN92A, submitted by the applicant as an IDS). Regarding claims 1, 11, CN92A discloses a power control method, a communication apparatus(Figs. 1-3), comprising: at least one processor(page 7, which recites in possible design the apparatus includes a transceiver, a processor, and a memory) ; and at least one non-transitory computer-readable memory coupled to the at least one processor and including computer program code, wherein the at least one non-transitory computer-readable memory and the computer program code are configured, with the at least one processor(page 7, which recites in possible design the apparatus includes a transceiver, a processor, and a memory), to cause the apparatus to: sending an excitation signal at a first power to a terminal device(Abstract, claim 1, which recites an activation power signal considered as an excitation signal); and sending a communication signal at a second power to the terminal device(Abstract, claim 1, which recites a communication power signal as claimed by the instant application), wherein the communication signal bears information, and the second power is less than the first power(Abstract, claim 1, which recites one signal power is less than the other as claimed by the present application). Regarding claims 6, 16, CN92A discloses a power control method, a communication apparatus comprising: at least one processor(page 7, which recites in possible design the apparatus includes a transceiver, a processor, and a memory) ; and at least one non-transitory computer-readable memory coupled to the at least one processor and including computer program code, wherein the at least one non-transitory computer-readable memory and the computer program code are configured, with the at least one processor(page 7, which recites in possible design the apparatus includes a transceiver, a processor, and a memory), to cause the apparatus to: determining indication information(Abstract, claim 1, which recites an indication power signal); and sending the indication information to a first device, wherein the indication information is associated with determining a signal transmit power of the first device(Abstract, claim 1, which recites an indication power signal), wherein the signal transmit power comprises at least one of a first power or a second power(Abstract, claim 1, which recites an indication power signal comprising two powers) ; wherein the first power is a power of an excitation signal(Abstract, claim 1, which recites an activation power signal considered as an excitation signal);, wherein the second power is a power of a communication signal(Abstract, claim 1, which recites a communication power signal as claimed by the instant application), wherein the communication signal bears information, and wherein the second power is less than or equal to the first power(Abstract, claim 1, which recites one signal power is less than the other as claimed by the present application). Regarding claims 2,12, CN92A discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: receiving first indication information from a second device, wherein the first indication information indicates at least one of the first power or/and the second power(Abstract, claim 1). Regarding claims 3, 9,13,19, CN92A discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: receiving second indication information from a second device, wherein the second indication information indicates a first parameter, wherein the first parameter comprises at least one of a first coexistence mode or a first coverage level, wherein the first coexistence mode is a coexistence mode between a first device and a first communication network, (pages 10); and wherein the first coverage level indicates a size of a coverage area of the first device(Pages 13-14); and determining at least one of the first power or the second power based on the first parameter(Abstract, claim 1). Regarding claims 4, 14, CN92A discloses the method according to claim 3, wherein the method further comprises: receiving first configuration information from the second device, wherein the first configuration information is associated with configuring a correspondence between a parameter in a first parameter set and a power, and wherein the first parameter set comprises the first parameter(Abstract, claim 1); and wherein the determining at least one of the first power and the second power based on the first parameter comprises: determining the at least one of the first power or the second power based on the first parameter and the correspondence between the parameter in the first parameter set and the power(Abstract, claim 1). Regarding claims 7, 17,CN92A discloses the method according to claim 6, wherein the second power is less than the first power(Abstract, claim 1). Regarding claims 8, 18, CN92A discloses the method according to claim 6, wherein the indication information is first indication information, and wherein the first indication information indicates the signal transmit power(Abstract, claim 1). Regarding claims 10, 20, CN92A discloses the method according to claim 9, wherein the method further comprises: sending first configuration information to the first device, wherein the first configuration information is associated with configuring a correspondence between a parameter in a first parameter set and a power, and wherein the first parameter set comprises the first parameter(Abstract, claim 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 5, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN92A in view CN11436036A (hereinafter CN036A, submitted by the applicant as IDS) . Regarding claims 5,15, CN92A discloses the method according to claim 1 as addressed above, except wherein the method further comprises: receiving third indication information from a second device; wherein at least one of: the third indication information indicates at least one of the first power or a difference between the first power and the second power, and wherein the method further comprises determining the second power based on the first power and the difference; or the third indication information indicates at least one of the second power or the difference between the first power and the second power, and wherein the method further comprises determining the first power based on the second power and the difference. However, CN036A teaches the method further comprises: receiving third indication information from a second device(Claim 1,Pages 10-11); wherein at least one of: the third indication information indicates at least one of the first power or a difference between the first power and the second power(Pages 4-5), and wherein the method further comprises determining the second power based on the first power and the difference(Pages 4-5); or the third indication information indicates at least one of the second power or the difference between the first power and the second power, and wherein the method further comprises determining the first power based on the second power and the difference(Pages 4-5). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of CN036A with the teaching of CN92A by using the above features such as receiving third indication information from a second device; wherein at least one of: the third indication information indicates at least one of the first power or a difference between the first power and the second power, and wherein the method further comprises determining the second power based on the first power and the difference; or the third indication information indicates at least one of the second power or the difference between the first power and the second power, and wherein the method further comprises determining the first power based on the second power and the difference as taught by CN036A for the purpose of reasonably controlled the power(Abstract). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DADY CHERY whose telephone number is (571)270-1207. The examiner can normally be reached M to T, 8 am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Moo Jeong can be reached at 571-272-9617. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DADY CHERY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2418
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641585
COHERENCE BANDWIDTH SIGNALING FOR FREQUENCY DOMAIN IMBALANCE CORRECTION
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641623
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING CONFIGURATION INFORMATION OF PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634764
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EXEMPTION FROM NETWORK SLICE BITRATE LIMITATIONS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634045
METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING HARQ FEEDBACK INFORMATION
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628168
COORDINATED SIDELINK RESOURCE ALLOCATION
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+9.3%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1466 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month