Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/607,710

GROUNDING BRUSH ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
VO, ETHAN NGUYEN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Aktiebolaget SKF
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
25 granted / 36 resolved
+1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
69
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.2%
+22.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 36 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-7 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arnault (US 2021/0364040) and in view of Giehl (US 2024/0280144). As to claim 1, Arnault discloses a grounding brush assembly comprising: a grounding brush including a support and a plurality of conductive fibers fitted inside the support (Fig. 1); and a brush fitting plate connected with the support of the brush and including a plurality of retention tongues configured to retain the support, a radial portion, an annular flange extending from the radial portion and offset radially outwardly from the plurality of retention tongues (Fig. 1), the annular flange having an outer surface defining the outer diameter of the fitting plate (Fig. 1), and at least one local deformation formed on the flange and extending radially inwardly (Fig. 6). PNG media_image1.png 477 617 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 742 523 media_image2.png Greyscale Arnault fails to disclose a plurality of through-openings which each extend through the radial portion and through the flange. Giehl, however, discloses a plurality of through-openings which each extend through the radial portion and through the flange (Fig. 2). PNG media_image3.png 415 412 media_image3.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the assembly of Arnault with a plurality of through-openings which each extend through the radial portion and through the flange, as disclosed by Giehl, to provide cooling to the assembly. As to claim 2, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1, wherein the at least one local deformation (Fig. 3 of Arnault) is disposed circumferentially between two of the plurality of through-openings (Fig. 2 of Giehl) of the fitting plate. PNG media_image4.png 788 459 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 401 412 media_image5.png Greyscale As to claim 3, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1, wherein the at least one local deformation extends axially from the free end of the flange of the fitting plate (Fig, 6 of Arnault). PNG media_image6.png 742 523 media_image6.png Greyscale As to claim 4, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1, wherein the at least one local deformation is formed on a portion of an axial length of the flange of the fitting plate (Fig, 3 of Arnault). PNG media_image7.png 788 459 media_image7.png Greyscale As to claim 5, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1, wherein the at least one local deformation is formed on an entire axial length of the flange of the fitting plate (Fig, 3 of Arnault). PNG media_image8.png 788 459 media_image8.png Greyscale As to claim 6, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1, wherein the at least one local deformation is axially spaced from a free end of the flange of the fitting plate (Fig, 3 of Arnault). PNG media_image9.png 788 459 media_image9.png Greyscale As to claim 7, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1, wherein the at least one local deformation includes a plurality of local deformations formed on the flange of the fitting plate (Fig. 6 of Arnault), each one of the plurality of local deformations extending radially inwardly (Fig. 6 of Arnault) and the plurality of local deformations being circumferentially spaced apart (Fig. 3 of Arnault). PNG media_image4.png 788 459 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 742 523 media_image10.png Greyscale As to claim 10, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses an electric motor comprising: a housing (Para 0024 of Arnault); a shaft (Para 0018 of Arnault); and at least one grounding brush assembly according to claim 1 fitted radially between the housing and the shaft, the conductive fibers of the brush of the grounding brush assembly being in contact with the shaft (Para 0027 of Arnault). Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arnault, Giehl and in view of Hubert (DE 102019202844). As to claim 8, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1. Arnault fails to disclose wherein the plurality of retention tongues of the fitting plate extend from the radial portion of the fitting plate. Hubert, however, discloses wherein the plurality of retention tongues of the fitting plate extend from the radial portion of the fitting plate (Fig. 3 and 4). PNG media_image11.png 490 415 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 361 385 media_image12.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the assembly of Arnault with the plurality of retention tongues of the fitting plate extend from the radial portion of the fitting plate, as disclosed by Hubert, to reduce manufacturing cost and improve structural integrity. As to claim 8, the combination of Arnault and Giehl discloses the assembly according to claim 1. Arnault fails to disclose wherein the radial portion of the fitting plate is supported axially against the support of the brush. Hubert, however, discloses the radial portion of the fitting plate is supported axially against the support of the brush (Fig. 4). PNG media_image12.png 361 385 media_image12.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide the assembly of Arnault with the radial portion of the fitting plate is supported axially against the support of the brush, as disclosed by Hubert, to reduce manufacturing cost and improve structural integrity. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ETHAN N VO whose telephone number is (571)270-7593. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached on 571 272 3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visithttps://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ETHAN NGUYEN VO/ Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /MAGED M ALMAWRI/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603538
ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592597
SELECTIVE PERMEABILITY ROTOR STRUCTURE FOR INTERIOR PERMANENT MAGNET MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587059
Electric Motor Coolant Frame and Header
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580446
ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580501
VIBRATION WAVE RADIATING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+23.2%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 36 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month