Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/607,869

ANTI-FLUTTER BRACKETS FOR HOOD ASSEMBLIES OF VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
WALTERS, JOHN DANIEL
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1036 granted / 1286 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1314
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1286 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1 – 18 have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 9 – 10, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nishida et al. (JP2009137525). In regard to claims 1, 9, and 17, Nishida discloses a hood assembly for a vehicle, the hood assembly comprising a hood inner panel (Fig. 4, item 4), an outer hood panel connected to the hood inner panel (Fig. 4, item 3), and an anti-flutter bracket that includes a bracket body (Fig. 4, items 11 and 12) and an energy absorption material that is softer than the bracket body located between the outer hood panel and a first flat area of the bracket body that extends parallel to the outer hood panel (Fig. 4, items 18 and 19). In regard to claim 9, Nishida discloses wherein the bracket body is installed to an inner hood panel (Fig. 5, item 24). In regard to claim 10, Nishida discloses wherein the energy absorption material is bonded to the bracket thereby (Figs. 4 and 5). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 – 8, 11 – 16, and 18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Nishida et al. (JP2009137525) discloses a hood assembly similar to the instant invention; however Nishida, either alone or in combination, neither discloses nor suggests a hood assembly wherein (in regard to claims 2 and 18) the energy absorption material is bonded only to the bracket body thereby allowing the anti-flutter bracket to move independently of the outer hood panel when there is thermal expansion of the outer hood panel, and (in regard to claims 3 and 11) wherein the bracket body comprises a second flat area with double sided adhesive tape and a pinch feature that together engage the hood inner panel. These limitations, in combination with each and every other independent claim limitation, are not shown in the currently cited prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Ishitobi (7,810,877) discloses an automobile hood; Shastry et al. (9,663,149) disclose a vehicle hood stiffener; Rivera et al. (10,787,201) disclose a vehicle bonnet construction; Onaka et al. (11,623,696) disclose a vehicle bonnet structure; Honda (JP2024003526) discloses a vehicle front part structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN DANIEL WALTERS whose telephone number is (571)272-8269. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 am - 5 pm (PT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at 303.297.4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN D WALTERS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630091
ELECTRIC POWERED SIDE STEP ASSEMBLY FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630208
STROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623705
LOAD CARRIER WITH STORAGE FACILITY IN THE BASE FOR STORING COLUMNS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617443
MANNED FOLDING PEDAL OF OUTDOOR FOLDABLE ELECTRIC TRAILER
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611923
COOLING SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC TRACTION MACHINE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1286 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month