Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/607,881

DIRECT BACKSIDE CONTACT INTEGRATION WITH THICK SILICON LAYER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
ROBERTSON, NOAH CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allowance Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-60.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
6
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (i.e., Claims 1-12) in the reply filed on June 18th, 2026, is acknowledged. Therefore, Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention. The restriction is, therefore, made FINAL. Status of Claims Pursuant to Applicant’s reply to restriction requirement dated June 18th, 2026, Claims 1-20 are pending; however, Claims 13-20 are withdrawn for the above stated reasons and are not subject to the within examination. Therefore, Claims 1-12 shall be examined on the merits. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) filed on March 18th, 2024, is being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: a) [0088], line 3, “and a lower portion..”; double period to end the sentence Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yu, et al. (US 20220069117 A1; hereinafter referred to as Yu). PNG media_image1.png 611 560 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 1, Yu discloses a method for forming a semiconductor device, the method comprising: forming a backside contact (backside source contact 270, [0041], Fig. 18A) electrically coupled to a first source or drain (S/D) region (source feature 242S, [0041], Fig. 18A), the backside contact comprising an upper portion (first portion 270-1, [0043], Fig. 18A) and a lower portion (second portion 270-2, [0043], Fig. 18A), the lower portion having a larger critical dimension than the upper portion ([0043], Fig. 18A; W2 [critical dimension of lower portion] > W1 [critical dimension of upper portion]); forming a frontside contact (frontside drain contact 280, [0035], Fig. 18A) electrically coupled to a second S/D region (drain feature 242D, [0035], Fig. 18A); and forming a backside contact dielectric liner that conformally wraps around an upper portion and the lower portion of the backside contact (liner 276, [0042], Fig. 18A). Regarding Claim 2, Yu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the backside contact dielectric liner extends under and in direct contact with portions of a conductive gate (Fig. 18A; liner is in direct contact with the gate structure 250). Regarding Claim 3, Yu discloses the method of claim 2, wherein the conductive gate is electrically coupled to the first S/D region and to the second S/D region (Fig. 18A, gate structure 250 is electrically coupled to the first and second source/drain regions through the inner spacer features). Regarding Claim 4, Yu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the backside contact dielectric liner conformally wraps around a residual backside contact placeholder (dummy epitaxial feature 238, [0028], Fig. 18A; dummy epitaxial feature 238 is made of the same material as the residual backside contact placeholder of the instant application). Regarding Claim 5, Yu discloses the method of claim 4, wherein the residual backside contact placeholder is in direct contact with a silicon cap (first epitaxial layer 240, [0028], Fig. 18A; the first epitaxial layer can be made of silicon). Regarding Claim 6, Yu discloses the method of claim 5, wherein the silicon cap is in direct contact with the second S/D region (Fig 18A). Regarding Claim 7, Yu discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising forming a passive device region having a silicon layer (substrate 202, [0017], Fig. 3B) under a shallow trench isolation region (isolation feature 214, [0020], Fig. 3B). Regarding Claim 8, Yu discloses the method of claim 7, wherein a height of the silicon layer under the shallow trench isolation region in the passive device region and a height of the lower portion of the backside contact are the same ([0043]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-12 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: a) Regarding Claim 9, the closest prior art of record, Yu, discloses the method of claim 1, wherein forming the backside contact comprises: forming a first backside placeholder having a first critical dimension (epitaxial feature 238, see Annotated Fig. 11A). PNG media_image2.png 539 544 media_image2.png Greyscale However, Yu, alone or in combination with any other prior art of record, discloses or can render obvious forming a second backside placeholder on the first backside placeholder, the second backside placeholder having a second critical dimension less than the first critical dimension. Specifically, said limitation is material to the inventive concept of the instant application for DBC integration with thick silicon layers in order to enable passive device and tight N2P spacing. While the use of a singular backside placeholder during the formation of a backside contact (as can be found in Yu, Wei et al., and is known in the art) is not novel, the introduction of a second backside placeholder having a smaller critical dimension than the first and being formed on the first backside placeholder for the formation of a singular backside contact appears to be allowable subject matter. b) Regarding Claims 10-12, said claims further limit previously stated allowable subject matter. Therefore, said claims are also deemed allowable subject matter. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: a) Chiang, et al. (US 20210305381 A1); discloses backside power rail and backside self-aligned via using a singular placeholder b) Yu, et al. (US 20220367619 A1); discloses backside power rail formation c) Ahn, et al. (US 20240421162 A1); discloses an integrated circuit device with a stepped backside contact and a residual backside contact d) Chang, et al. (US 20220093512 A1); discloses backside power rail and contact formation methods Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Noah C. Robertson whose telephone number is (571) 317-0595. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30 AM - 6:30 PM (Eastern Time Zone). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William B Partridge, can be reached at (571) 270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at (866) 217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call (800) 786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or (571) 272-1000. /Noah C. Robertson/Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /William B Partridge/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month