Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/607,939

MIDDLE FRAME ASSEMBLY AND DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Priority
Aug 14, 2023 — CN 202311020565.1
Examiner
NIEVES, NELSON J
Art Unit
2835
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shanghai Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
605 granted / 803 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
823
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
72.1%
+32.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 803 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US 20150342089), hereinafter referred to as Kim. Re claim 1, Kim teaches a middle frame assembly, comprising: a middle frame (211); a back cover (240), wherein an accommodating cavity (see Fig 6) is formed between the back cover and the middle frame; a homothermal structure (220) located in the accommodating cavity; and a radiating fin (222) located in the accommodating cavity, wherein a contact area (contact area) between the radiating fin and the homothermal structure is changeable (the examiner notes that the contact area is changeable during disassembly). Allowable Subject Matter Claim18-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: None of the reference of record suggest or render obvious the limitation of wherein the display panel comprises a first frequency and a second frequency, the second frequency is greater than the first frequency, and a contact area between the radiating fin and the homothermal structure at the second frequency is smaller than a contact area between the radiating fin and the homothermal structure at the first frequency, in combination with the other claimed elements. Further, it would not have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to make such modification, absent permissible hindsight. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claim 2-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Re claim 2, none of the reference of record suggest or render obvious the limitation of wherein the radiating fin comprises at least two radiating sub-fins, one of the at least two radiating sub-fins corresponds to one of the at least two partitions, at least a part of one of the at least two radiating sub-fins is located in one corresponding partition of the at least two partitions, and a contact area between one of the at least two radiating sub-fins and the homothermal structure is changeable, in combination with the other claimed elements. Further, it would not have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to make such modification, absent permissible hindsight. Re claim 17, none of the reference of record suggest or render obvious the limitation of wherein in a direction perpendicular to a plane of the middle frame assembly, the radiating fin covers a part of the back cover located in the accommodating cavity; and wherein the radiating fin comprises a second primary heat dissipation portion and a second adjusting portion that are communicated with each other, the second primary heat dissipation portion is located at a side of the back cover, a gap is formed between the second adjusting portion and the back cover, and a contact area between the second adjusting portion and the homothermal structure varies in different states of the second adjusting portion, in combination with the other claimed elements. Further, it would not have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to make such modification, absent permissible hindsight. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. (see PTO-892). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NELSON NIEVES whose telephone number is (571)270-0392. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 9am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frantz Jules can be reached at 571-272-6681. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NELSON J NIEVES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3763 6/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680721
HIGH EFFICIENCY ARCHITECTURE AND CONTROL SCHEME FOR SOLID-STATE HVAC APPLICATIONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685158
HEAT DISSIPATION MEMBER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674597
REFRIGERANT DETECTION AND CONTROL OF HVAC SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663179
HEAT EXCHANGER MODULE AND MOTOR VEHICLE HAVING THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662021
COOLING SYSTEM FOR AIRCRAFT
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 803 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month