Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/608,720

SENSING SESSION BASED ON AN ENERGY SAVING MODE OF A SENSING NODE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
PANCHOLI, RINA C
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
489 granted / 569 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
598
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 569 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-30 received on 3/18/2024 have been examined, of which claims 1, 15, 29- 30 are independent. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 9-10, 12-20, 23-24, 26-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bao et al. (US 20220053424) Regarding claim 1, Bao teaches a sensing node (UE, fig 3A, 7), comprising: one or more memories (memory 340, fig 3A); one or more transceivers (transceiver 310, fig 3A); and one or more processors (processor 332, fig 3a) communicatively coupled to the one or more memories and the one or more transceivers (fig 3a, para 79-80), the one or more processors, either alone or in combination, configured (fig 7, para 150: fig 7 illustrates an example signaling and processing flow 700 for determining and reporting positioning information) to: receive, via the one or more transceivers, from a sensing management entity (location server 706, fig 7), a sensing configuration that is associated with a sensing session (PRS measurement configuration 741, fig 7; para 154: at stage 740, the location server 706 may send PRS measurement configuration messages 741 to the TRP 704 and/or to the UE 702) and comprises one or more rules for determination of one or more sensing parameters for the sensing session based on an energy saving mode of the sensing node (para 154: the UE-bound messages 741 may dynamically configure the UE 702 for measuring PRS, or skipping measuring PRS, based on relative timing of the PRS and a DRX ON time, e.g., according to one or more of the behaviors shown in Table 1), wherein the one or more sensing parameters are adapted from a set of sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration, or wherein the one or more sensing parameters are selected from a set of candidate sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration (para 154: the UE 702 may be configured to use any statically configured behavior as a default behavior to be followed in the absence of dynamic configuration information received from the location server 706, the UE 702 may be configured to override any statically configured behavior in response to receiving conflicting dynamic configuration information from the location server 706; para 166: when a UE is configured with multiple DRX groups, measurement configurations for DL-PRS need to be defined across the multiple DRX groups, a UE needs to know which DL-PRS occasions it is expected to measure when it is configured with multiple DRX groups); and selectively perform transmission operations, reception operations, or both, associated with the sensing session in accordance with the one or more sensing parameters (receive PRS 761, measure positioning signals 770, positioning reporting 791, fig 7; 157-160: the UE may implement one of the measurement behaviors in accordance with whether the DL-PRS from stage 760 is scheduled to arrive fully within a DRX ON time, partially within and partially outside a DRX ON time, or fully outside a DRX ON time (fully in a DRX OFF time), the UE 702 sends an L1/L2 positioning report 791 and/or an L3 positioning report 792 (e.g., a measurement report) in accordance with a static and/or dynamic positioning reporting configuration of the UE 702 and timing of the report relative to a DRX cycle). Regarding claim 15, Bao teaches a sensing management entity (server, fig 3c, 7), comprising: one or more memories (memory 396, fig 3c); one or more transceivers (transceiver 390, fig 3c); and one or more processors (processor 394, fig 3c) communicatively coupled to the one or more memories and the one or more transceivers (fig 3c, para 79-80), the one or more processors, either alone or in combination, configured (fig 7, para 150: fig 7 illustrates an example signaling and processing flow 700 for determining and reporting positioning information) to: transmit, via the one or more transceivers, to a sensing node (UE 702, fig 7), a sensing configuration that is associated with a sensing session (PRS measurement configuration 741, fig 7; para 154: at stage 740, the location server 706 may send PRS measurement configuration messages 741 to the TRP 704 and/or to the UE 702) and comprises one or more rules for determination of one or more sensing parameters for the sensing session based on an energy saving mode of the sensing node (para 154: the UE-bound messages 741 may dynamically configure the UE 702 for measuring PRS, or skipping measuring PRS, based on relative timing of the PRS and a DRX ON time, e.g., according to one or more of the behaviors shown in Table 1), wherein the one or more sensing parameters are adapted from a set of sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration, or wherein the one or more sensing parameters are selected from a set of candidate sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration (para 154: the UE 702 may be configured to use any statically configured behavior as a default behavior to be followed in the absence of dynamic configuration information received from the location server 706, the UE 702 may be configured to override any statically configured behavior in response to receiving conflicting dynamic configuration information from the location server 706; para 166: when a UE is configured with multiple DRX groups, measurement configurations for DL-PRS need to be defined across the multiple DRX groups, a UE needs to know which DL-PRS occasions it is expected to measure when it is configured with multiple DRX groups); and receive, via the one or more transceivers, one or more measurement reports associated with the sensing session based on the sensing configuration (receive PRS 761, measure positioning signals 770, positioning reporting 791, fig 7; 157-160: the UE may implement one of the measurement behaviors in accordance with whether the DL-PRS from stage 760 is scheduled to arrive fully within a DRX ON time, partially within and partially outside a DRX ON time, or fully outside a DRX ON time (fully in a DRX OFF time), the UE 702 sends an L1/L2 positioning report 791 and/or an L3 positioning report 792 (e.g., a measurement report) in accordance with a static and/or dynamic positioning reporting configuration of the UE 702 and timing of the report relative to a DRX cycle). Regarding claim 29, Bao teaches a method of operating a sensing node (UE 702, fig 7, para 150: fig 7 illustrates an example signaling and processing flow 700 for determining and reporting positioning information), comprising: receiving, from a sensing management entity (location server 706, fig 7), a sensing configuration that is associated with a sensing session (PRS measurement configuration 741, fig 7; para 154: at stage 740, the location server 706 may send PRS measurement configuration messages 741 to the TRP 704 and/or to the UE 702) and comprises one or more rules for determination of one or more sensing parameters for the sensing session based on an energy saving mode of the sensing node (para 154: the UE-bound messages 741 may dynamically configure the UE 702 for measuring PRS, or skipping measuring PRS, based on relative timing of the PRS and a DRX ON time, e.g., according to one or more of the behaviors shown in Table 1), wherein the one or more sensing parameters are adapted from a set of sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration, or wherein the one or more sensing parameters are selected from a set of candidate sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration (para 154: The UE 702 may be configured to use any statically configured behavior as a default behavior to be followed in the absence of dynamic configuration information received from the location server 706. The UE 702 may be configured to override any statically configured behavior in response to receiving conflicting dynamic configuration information from the location server 706; para 166: when a UE is configured with multiple DRX groups, measurement configurations for DL-PRS need to be defined across the multiple DRX groups. That is, a UE needs to know which DL-PRS occasions it is expected to measure when it is configured with multiple DRX groups); and selectively performing transmission operations, reception operations, or both, associated with the sensing session in accordance with the one or more sensing parameters (receive PRS 761, measure positioning signals 770, positioning reporting 791, fig 7; 157-160: the UE may implement one of the measurement behaviors in accordance with whether the DL-PRS from stage 760 is scheduled to arrive fully within a DRX ON time, partially within and partially outside a DRX ON time, or fully outside a DRX ON time (fully in a DRX OFF time), the UE 702 sends an L1/L2 positioning report 791 and/or an L3 positioning report 792 (e.g., a measurement report) in accordance with a static and/or dynamic positioning reporting configuration of the UE 702 and timing of the report relative to a DRX cycle). Regarding claim 30, Bao teaches a method of operating a sensing management entity (server 706, fig 7, para 150: fig 7 illustrates an example signaling and processing flow 700 for determining and reporting positioning information), comprising: transmitting, to a sensing node (UE 702, fig 7), a sensing configuration that is associated with a sensing session (PRS measurement configuration 741, fig 7; para 154: at stage 740, the location server 706 may send PRS measurement configuration messages 741 to the TRP 704 and/or to the UE 702) and comprises one or more rules for determination of one or more sensing parameters for the sensing session based on an energy saving mode of the sensing node (para 154: the UE-bound messages 741 may dynamically configure the UE 702 for measuring PRS, or skipping measuring PRS, based on relative timing of the PRS and a DRX ON time, e.g., according to one or more of the behaviors shown in Table 1), wherein the one or more sensing parameters are adapted from a set of sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration, or wherein the one or more sensing parameters are selected from a set of candidate sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration (para 154: the UE 702 may be configured to use any statically configured behavior as a default behavior to be followed in the absence of dynamic configuration information received from the location server 706, the UE 702 may be configured to override any statically configured behavior in response to receiving conflicting dynamic configuration information from the location server 706; para 166: when a UE is configured with multiple DRX groups, measurement configurations for DL-PRS need to be defined across the multiple DRX groups, a UE needs to know which DL-PRS occasions it is expected to measure when it is configured with multiple DRX groups); and receiving one or more measurement reports associated with the sensing session based on the sensing configuration (receive PRS 761, measure positioning signals 770, positioning reporting 791, fig 7; 157-160: the UE may implement one of the measurement behaviors in accordance with whether the DL-PRS from stage 760 is scheduled to arrive fully within a DRX ON time, partially within and partially outside a DRX ON time, or fully outside a DRX ON time (fully in a DRX OFF time), the UE 702 sends an L1/L2 positioning report 791 and/or an L3 positioning report 792 (e.g., a measurement report) in accordance with a static and/or dynamic positioning reporting configuration of the UE 702 and timing of the report relative to a DRX cycle). Regarding claim 2 and 16, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more rules comprise a rule for implementing the one or more sensing parameters during the sensing session whenever the energy saving mode is active (para 154: the UE 702, the UE-bound messages 741 may dynamically configure the UE 702 for measuring PRS, or skipping measuring PRS, based on relative timing of the PRS and a DRX ON time, e.g., according to one or more of the behaviors shown in Table 1; para 158: the UE may implement one of the measurement behaviors in accordance with whether the DL-PRS from stage 760 is scheduled to arrive fully within a DRX ON time, partially within and partially outside a DRX ON time, or fully outside a DRX ON time (fully in a DRX OFF time); para 148). Regarding claim 3 and 17, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more rules comprise a set of rules for implementing the one or more sensing parameters in response to a set of triggering events (para 156: at stage 755, a trigger/activation message 756 may be sent from the TRP 704 to the UE 702, the trigger/activation message 756 may be DCI to trigger aperiodic PRS measurement and/or may activate semipersistent PRS measurement, the message 756 may indicate what PRS to measure and how to report (e.g., available slot, channel, etc.)). Regarding claim 4 and 18, Bao further teaches wherein the set of rules comprises: a fifth rule for implementing the one or more sensing parameters in response to an energy saving mode transition (table 1 describes the measurement behavior for the overlap condition (timing related parameter) of DL-PRS occasion partially overlaps with DRX-ON time, behavior 2.b – measure only DL-PRS resources within the DRX ON time). Regarding claim 5, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more processors (processor 332, fig 3a), either alone or in combination, are further configured (fig 7) to: transmit, via the one or more transceivers, an indication of an energy saving mode capability of the sensing node to a sensing management entity (para 152: at stage 720, the UE 702 may send one or more measurement and reporting suggested configuration/capability messages 721 to the location server 706. The message(s) 721 may indicate a configuration of the UE 702 regarding measurement behavior for measuring positioning signals (e.g., PRS) in view of DRX mode operation of the UE 702), wherein the sensing configuration is based on the energy saving mode capability of the sensing node (para 153: the configuration message 732 may provide information for receiving PRS, such as DL-PRS and/or UL-PRS (e.g., depending on the capabilities of the UE 702)). Regarding claim 6 and 20, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more sensing parameters are associated with a discontinuous reception mode (DRX) mode of the sensing node (para 152, 154: the message(s) 721 may indicate a configuration of the UE 702 regarding measurement behavior for measuring positioning signals (e.g., PRS) in view of DRX mode operation of the UE 702, the UE-bound messages 741 may dynamically configure the UE 702 for measuring PRS, or skipping measuring PRS, based on relative timing of the PRS and a DRX ON time). Regarding claim 9 and 23, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more rules comprise: a first rule for implementing a first set of sensing parameters for a first energy saving mode type (fig 10, design column, reuse DL-PRS + one DRX group design per group, the measurement configuration can be a single configuration for all DRX groups; also, table 1 showing different rules (behaviors) for DL-PRS occasion overlapping with DRX ON time, DRX OFF time), and a second rule for implementing a second set of sensing parameters for a second energy saving mode type (fig 10, design column, reuse DL-PRS + one DRX group design per group, the measurement configuration can be one configuration per DRX group (e.g. for one group, measure all PRS, for another group, measure a subset of PRS; also, table 1 showing different rules (behaviors) for DL-PRS occasion overlapping with DRX ON time, DRX OFF time), wherein the one or more sensing parameters are based on a respective energy saving mode type corresponding to the energy saving mode of the sensing node (table 10, design column describing different DRX group with different configuration; table 1 measurement behavior of skipping or measuring based on DL-PRS overlapping with DRX ON or DRX OFF time). Regarding claim 10 and 24, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more rules comprise: a second rule for implementing the one or more sensing parameters in association with the sensing session corresponding to a downlink sensing session (fig 10, downlink positioning reference signal (DL-PRS) measurement configurations for multiple DRX groups; Para 166). Regarding claim 12 and 26, Bao further teaches wherein the sensing session is aperiodic or semi-persistent or periodic (para 156: at stage 755, a trigger/activation message 756 may be sent from the TRP 704 to the UE 702, the trigger/activation message 756 may be DCI to trigger aperiodic PRS measurement and/or may activate semipersistent PRS measurement). Regarding claim 13 and 27, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more sensing parameters are adapted from the set of sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration (para 154: the UE 702 may be configured to use any statically configured behavior as a default behavior to be followed in the absence of dynamic configuration information received from the location server 706, the UE 702 may be configured to override any statically configured behavior in response to receiving conflicting dynamic configuration information from the location server 706). Regarding claim 14 and 28, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more sensing parameters are selected from the set of candidate sensing parameters indicated by the sensing configuration (para 166: when a UE is configured with multiple DRX groups, measurement configurations for DL-PRS need to be defined across the multiple DRX groups, a UE needs to know which DL-PRS occasions it is expected to measure when it is configured with multiple DRX groups). Regarding claim 19, Bao further teaches wherein the one or more processors (processor 394, fig 3c), either alone or in combination, are further configured (fig 7) to: receive, via the one or more transceivers, an indication of an energy saving mode capability of the sensing node (para 152: at stage 720, the UE 702 may send one or more measurement and reporting suggested configuration/capability messages 721 to the location server 706. The message(s) 721 may indicate a configuration of the UE 702 regarding measurement behavior for measuring positioning signals (e.g., PRS) in view of DRX mode operation of the UE 702), wherein the sensing configuration is based on the energy saving mode capability of the sensing node (para 153: the configuration message 732 may provide information for receiving PRS, such as DL-PRS and/or UL-PRS (e.g., depending on the capabilities of the UE 702)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims, the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 11 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bao et al. (US 20220053424) in view of Kuo et al. (US 20240334230) Regarding claim 11 and 25, Bao teaches the limitations of the parent claim. Bao fails to teach the sensing (positioning) session to be monostatic or bistatic. Kuo is directed to configuration of sensing signal and sensing results reporting. Kuo further teaches wherein the one or more rules comprise: a first rule for implementing the one or more sensing parameters in association with a monostatic sensing session (para 74: UE that can support both sensing signal transmission and sensing signal measurement may be configured by the BS to perform monostatic sensing; para 28: monostatic sensing may include a first antenna(s) for transmitting a sensing signal and a co-located second antenna(s) for receiving the sensing signal), or a second rule for implementing the one or more sensing parameters in association with a bistatic sensing session corresponding to a downlink sensing session (para 74: a UE that can only support sensing signal transmission may be configured by the BS to act only as the transmitter in bistatic sensing; para 28: in instance of bistatic sensing, two separate antennas are used for transmitting and receiving, and the transmitting antenna(s) are in a different location than the receiving antenna(s)). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine position measurement with DRX mode as taught by Bao with sensing session configuration as taught by Kuo for the benefit of detecting the presence of a condition or an object as taught by Kuo in para 60. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-8, 21-22 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RINA C PANCHOLI whose telephone number is (571)272-2679. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached on 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RINA C PANCHOLI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 1/10/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587905
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MOBILE AP BACKHAUL LINK SETUP AND OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581556
DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ENHANCED MULTI-LINK OPERATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562795
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING CSI REPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550050
TECHNIQUES FOR NON-INTEGRATED TRAFFIC AGGREGATION, STEERING, AND SWITCHING FOR A PROTOCOL DATA UNIT SESSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543115
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING SENSING IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 569 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month