Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/608,725

POWER CONTROL ENHANCEMENT FOR SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL TRANSMISSIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
CAI, WAYNE HUU
Art Unit
2644
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
709 granted / 892 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
929
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.2%
+15.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 892 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on July 22, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were received on March 18, 2024. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6, 8-9, and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gong et al. (hereinafter “Gong”, EP 3 754 885 as recited in IDS dated July 22, 2024). Regarding claims 1, and 9, Gong discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE) (i.e., terminal device 70 as shown in Fig. 7), and a method of wireless communication by a user equipment (UE) comprising: one or more memories (i.e., memory as shown in Fig. 7); and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories (i.e., processor as shown in Fig. 7), the one or more processors being configured to: receive a sounding reference signal (SRS) configuration from a network entity (i.e., the terminal device obtains, based on the indication of the SRS resource as described in paragraph 0077), the SRS configuration indicating a plurality of SRS ports of an SRS resource assigned to a plurality of symbols (i.e., the network device configures one or more SRS resources for the terminal device. This indicates a quantity of antenna ports used by the SRS resource for transmission as described in paragraphs 0004, 0077 and 0094); determine a port transmit power for each of the plurality of SRS ports based on a total transmit power available for each of the plurality of symbols divided by a number of the SRS ports assigned in each of the plurality of symbols (i.e., determining the transmit power of each port based on the quantity of ports as described in paragraphs 0014, 0090 and 0100); and transmit, to the network entity, a plurality of SRSs respectively via the plurality of SRS ports, wherein each SRS of the plurality of SRSs is transmitted using the port transmit power via a respective SRS port of the plurality of SRS ports in a respective symbol of the plurality of symbols (i.e., SRSs carried in plurality of SRS resources are simultaneously transmitted on the first time domain resource based on the transmit power of each port corresponding to each of the plurality of SRS resources as described in paragraph 0091). Regarding claims 6 and 14, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above. Gong also discloses wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: transmit, to the network entity, at least one of a capability report or a power headroom report indicating the total transmit power available for each symbol (i.e., transmitting to the network device indicating the power headroom as described in paragraphs 0092-0093). Regarding claim 8, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above. Gong also discloses wherein the plurality of SRSs are transmitted on an active uplink bandwidth part of a carrier of a serving cell (i.e., transmitting an SRA in a carrier of a cell C as described in paragraph 0097). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3, and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong in view of Cai et al. (hereinafter “Cai”, US 2025/0038920). Regarding claims 2 and 10, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Cai discloses communication method and communication apparatus. Cai also discloses wherein the plurality of symbols are a plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols (i.e., OFDM symbols as described in paragraph 0213). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enhance the quality of the SRS. Regarding claims 3 and 11, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Cai discloses communication method and communication apparatus. Cai also discloses wherein each symbol of the plurality of symbols is assigned a same number of SRS ports (i.e., same number of ports are assigned to OFDM symbol as shown in Fig. 3, and its descriptions). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enhance the quality of the SRS. Claim(s) 4, 7, 12, 15-16, 19, 21-24, 27, and 29-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong in view of Shi et al. (hereinafter “Shi”, EP 3 644 657 as cited in IDS dated July 22, 2024). Regarding claims 4 and 12, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Shi discloses power control method and device, and terminal. Shi also discloses wherein the plurality of SRSs are for a codebook based physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) or for an antenna switching for downlink channel state information (CSI) estimation (i.e., the UE estimates downlink channel information as described in paragraph 0026). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enable the UE to perform MIMO transmissions for PUSCHs in the NR. Regarding claims 7 and 15, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Shi discloses power control method and device, and terminal. Shi also discloses wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: receive, from the network entity, a notification of a selected SRS port out of the plurality of SRS ports (i.e., network configures three single-ported SRSs as described in paragraphs 0044-0046); and transmit an uplink communication using the selected SRS port (i.e., UE transmitting using the configured ports as described in paragraphs 0044-0046). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to maximize the transmitting power. Regarding claims 16 and 24, Gong discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at a network entity (i.e., base station 80 as shown in Fig. 8), and a method of wireless communication by a network entity, comprising: one or more memories (i.e., memory 8021 as shown in Fig. 8); and one or more processors coupled to the one or more memories (i.e., processor 8022 as shown in Fig. 8), the one or more processors being configured to: provide an SRS configuration to a user equipment (UE), the SRS configuration indicating a plurality of sounding reference signal (SRS) ports of an SRS resource assigned to a plurality of symbols (i.e., the network device configures one or more SRS resources for the terminal device. This indicates a quantity of antenna ports used by the SRS resource for transmission as described in paragraphs 0004, 0077 and 0094), wherein a port transmit power for each of the plurality of SRS ports is based on a total transmit power divided by a number of the SRS ports assigned in each of the plurality of symbols (i.e., determining the transmit power of each port based on the quantity of ports as described in paragraphs 0014, 0090 and 0100); obtain, from the UE, a plurality of SRSs respectively via the plurality of SRS ports, wherein each SRS of the plurality of SRSs is obtained via a respective SRS port of the plurality of SRS ports in a respective symbol of the plurality of symbols using the port transmit power (i.e., SRSs carried in plurality of SRS resources are simultaneously transmitted on the first time domain resource based on the transmit power of each port corresponding to each of the plurality of SRS resources as described in paragraph 0091). Gong, however, does not expressly disclose: estimate a plurality of uplink channel qualities respectively associated with the plurality of SRS ports based on the plurality of SRSs. In a similar endeavor, Shi discloses power control method and device, and terminal. Shi also discloses: estimate a plurality of uplink channel qualities respectively associated with the plurality of SRS ports based on the plurality of SRSs (i.e., the network indicates one or more SRSs according to a measurement result of the SRSs as described in paragraph 0026). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enable the UE to perform MIMO transmissions for PUSCHs in the NR. Regarding claims 19 and 27, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Shi also discloses wherein the plurality of SRSs are for a codebook based physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) or for an antenna switching for downlink channel state information (CSI) estimation (i.e., the UE estimates downlink channel information as described in paragraph 0026). Regarding claims 21 and 29, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Gong also discloses wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: obtain, from the UE, at least one of a capability report or a power headroom report indicating the total transmit power available for each symbol (i.e., transmitting to the network device indicating the power headroom as described in paragraphs 0092-0093). Regarding claims 22 and 30, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Shi also discloses wherein the one or more processors are further configured to: select an SRS port out of the plurality of SRS ports based on the plurality of uplink channel qualities (i.e., the network indicates one or more SRSs according to a measurement result of the SRSs as described in paragraph 0026); provide a notification of the selected SRS port to the UE (i.e., network configures three single-ported SRSs as described in paragraphs 0044-0046); and obtain an uplink communication from the UE using the selected SRS port (i.e., UE transmitting using the configured ports as described in paragraphs 0044-0046). Regarding claim 23, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Gong also discloses wherein the plurality of SRSs are obtained on an active uplink bandwidth part of a carrier of a serving cell (i.e., transmitting an SRA in a carrier of a cell C as described in paragraph 0097). Claim(s) 5, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong in view of Guo et al. (hereinafter “Guo”, US 2025/0310911). Regarding claims 5 and 13, Gong discloses all limitations recited within claims as described above. but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Guo discloses systems and methods for uplink timing alignment for inter-cell mobility. Guo also discloses wherein the total transmit power is derived based on an SRS power control loop driven by SRS power control commands indicated by the network entity (i.e., the UE determines a transmission power for an SRS transmission based on open loop power control parameter configured for the SRS transmission and/or pathloss computed by the UE using a reference signal associated with the SRS transmission and a TPC command included in DCI as described in paragraph 0085). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to maximize the transmission power. Claim(s) 17-18, and 25-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong in view of Shi and further in view of Cai. Regarding claims 17 and 25, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above, but do not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Cai discloses communication method and communication apparatus. Cai also discloses wherein the plurality of symbols are a plurality of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols (i.e., OFDM symbols as described in paragraph 0213). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enhance the quality of the SRS. Regarding claims 18 and 26, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above, but does not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Cai discloses communication method and communication apparatus. Cai also discloses wherein each symbol of the plurality of symbols is assigned a same number of SRS ports (i.e., same number of ports are assigned to OFDM symbol as shown in Fig. 3, and its descriptions). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to enhance the quality of the SRS. Claim(s) 20, and 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong in view of Shi, and further in view of Guo. Regarding claims 20 and 28, Gong and Shi disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. but do not expressly disclose features of these claims. In a similar endeavor, Guo discloses systems and methods for uplink timing alignment for inter-cell mobility. Guo also discloses wherein the total transmit power is derived based on an SRS power control loop driven by SRS power control commands indicated by the network entity (i.e., the UE determines a transmission power for an SRS transmission based on open loop power control parameter configured for the SRS transmission and/or pathloss computed by the UE using a reference signal associated with the SRS transmission and a TPC command included in DCI as described in paragraph 0085). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references, and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to maximize the transmission power. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE CAI whose telephone number is (571)272-7798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KATHY WANG-HURST can be reached on (571)270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Wayne H Cai/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604290
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING SYNCHRONIZATION SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597333
IDENTIFYING EMERGENCY RESPONSE VALIDITY AND SEVERITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598548
Support For Network Service
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593209
Secondary or Splice-Specific Access Control in a Wireless Communication Network
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593272
METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT (UE) FOR SELECTING ACCESS NETWORK FOR ROUTING DATA OF THE UE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 892 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month