Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/609,000

WORKING VEHICLE AND ATTACHMENT USAGE SYSTEM

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Examiner
GRIFFIN, ALEX BROCK
Art Unit
3665
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
8 granted / 18 resolved
-7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
58
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§103
36.6%
-3.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 18 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Introduction This is a response to applicant’s submissions filed on December 10, 2025. Claims 1-2, 5-9, 13-17, 19-23, and 27-31 are pending. Examiner' s Note Examiner has cited particular paragraphs / columns and line numbers or figures in the references as applied to the claims below for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant, in preparing the responses, to fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Applicant is reminded that the Examiner is entitled to give the broadest reasonable interpretation to the language of the claims. Furthermore, the Examiner is not limited to Applicants' definition which is not specifically set forth in the disclosure. Response to Arguments All of applicant’s arguments have been considered. Regarding applicant’s argument that amending claim 6 clarifies that the working device is different from the attachment (Applicant’s Response, pg. 17), the examiner respectfully disagrees. In paragraph 0051 of the specification, it states that the working device includes a bucket 30a and paragraph 0053 of the specification states that that the bucket 30a is an example of the attachment. Specification Amendments to the specification were received on December 10, 2025. The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Paragraph 0051 appears to contradict what is shown in Fig. 1 as the working device 4 is not shown to include a bucket 30a, boom(s) 11, lift link(s), control link(s) 13, and a quick hitch 16. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 14, RSSI does not have a definition of what the acronym represents. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-8 and 20-22 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 6 (lines 4, 7, and 9), claim 7 (line 4), claim 8 (line 4), claim 20 (lines 4, 7, and 9), claim 21 (line 4), and claim 22 (line 4), the limitation “working device” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear if the attachment previously claimed in claims 1 (line 2) and 17 (line 2) is part of the working device as paragraph 0051 states that the working device includes a bucket, which is an attachment. Claims 7-8 and 21-22 are also rejected as being dependent upon a rejected base claim as they do not clear the deficiencies of the claims from which they depend. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 5, 9, 13-17, 19, 23, and 27-31 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1, 17, 30, and 31, the prior art does not disclose or render obvious when the attachment is attached to the hitch, select, as identification-information-at-attaching, one of the one or more pieces of identification information that is included in one of the one or more wireless signals that is received by the receiver most frequently among the one or more wireless signals in a first preset period of time according to a condition (ii); then when the working vehicle takes action, select, as identification-information-at-action, one of the one or more pieces of identification information that is included in one of the one or more wireless signals that is received by the receiver most frequently among the one or more wireless signals in a second preset period of time according to the condition (ii). Zitterbart discloses using the strength of a communication signal to correctly identify an attachment. However, it does not disclose when the attachment is attached to the hitch, select, as identification-information-at-attaching, one of the one or more pieces of identification information that is included in one of the one or more wireless signals that is received by the receiver most frequently among the one or more wireless signals in a first preset period of time according to a condition (ii); then when the working vehicle takes action, select, as identification-information-at-action, one of the one or more pieces of identification information that is included in one of the one or more wireless signals that is received by the receiver most frequently among the one or more wireless signals in a second preset period of time according to the condition (ii). Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Claims 3-8 and 20-22 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX GRIFFIN whose telephone number is (703)756-1516. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:30am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ERIN BISHOP can be reached at (571)270-3713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX B GRIFFIN/Examiner, Art Unit 3665 /Erin D Bishop/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 03, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 03, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 10, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12534090
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF A LOAD SHIFT AT A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12522167
CONTROL DEVICE FOR A PERSONAL PROTECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12498249
SELF ADAPTIVE ENHANCEMENT FOR AUTOMATED DRIVING WITH MAP AND CAMERA ISSUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12434730
DRIVING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS, DRIVING ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING DRIVING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Patent 12412380
SENSOR INFORMATION FUSION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+39.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 18 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month