Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/609,211

PREDICTING CLASSIFICATION LABELS FOR BIOELECTRIC SIGNALS USING A NEURAL NETWORK

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Examiner
DOWNEY, JOHN R
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tiposi, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
311 granted / 522 resolved
-10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
564
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 522 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a mental process without significantly more. Step 1: All of claims 1-20 are directed either to a method/process or to a system/machine. Step 2A, Prong One: The claims recite a mental process including steps such as “generate a compensation factor … generate compensated patient bioelectric signals … predict a classification label …” which could be performed by the human mind and/or by a human with a physical aid such as pen and paper. Step 2A, Prong Two: This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because the claims merely implement the mental process using generic processing and machine learning technology and add insignificant extra-solution activity. Specifically: the steps of gathering/sensing/receiving the data is considered insignificant pre-solution activity of mere data gathering, since it merely collects the data necessary to carry out the mental process; the step of outputting/displaying the data (see e.g. claim 7) is considered insignificant post-solution activity since it merely outputs the result of the mental process using a generic output modality. Furthermore, merely carrying out mental steps using generic computing technology such as “one or more processors” and utilizing generic trained machine learning models is well established to not amount to an integration into a practical application under the § 101 analysis. See, e.g., MPEP §§ 2106.04(a)(2)(III)(C) and 2106.04(d)(I) and 2106.05(f). Here, the mental process is essentially carried out by merely being implemented in a machine learning environment using conventional machine learning techniques, which is not sufficient to make an otherwise mental process eligible under §101. Step 2B: The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the only additional elements recited in the claims are generic processing/computing/machine learning components and generic data collection and output components. The Examiner takes official notice that these are basic, generic components which are well-understood, routine and conventional in the medical diagnostic arts, and the claims here merely use them for their well-understood, routine and conventional functions. As such, those additional elements cannot be considered “significantly more” than the judicial exception in Step 2B of the § 101 analysis. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sanchez ‘636 is considered generally relevant. See, e.g., FIGS. 1 and 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN R DOWNEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7247. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am-5:00pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NIKETA PATEL can be reached at (571)-272-4156. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN R DOWNEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12567502
WIRELESS SENSOR MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12549633
PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION SENSOR AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543996
HEART WALL REFINEMENT OF ARRHYTHMIA SOURCE LOCATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539076
TERMINAL DEVICE, OUTPUT METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12527485
Physiological Sampling During Predetermined Activities
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+23.9%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 522 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month