Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/609,295

POLYMERS PREPARED FROM MEVALONOLACTONE AND DERIVATIVES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Priority
Nov 12, 2014 — provisional 62/078,511 +2 more
Examiner
KAHN, RACHEL
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Visolis Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
27%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
44%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 27% of cases
27%
Career Allowance Rate
182 granted / 664 resolved
-37.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
724
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
71.3%
+31.3% vs TC avg
§102
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 664 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-18 are pending as amended on 2/2/2026. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species ii, wherein the polymer is derived from a compound according to instant Formula XXIVb, and wherein R1 is H, Y is N(H) in the first instance and O in the second instance, and Q is linear C1-C6 alkyl, in the reply filed on 2/2/026 is acknowledged. [The elected species encompasses polymers comprising recurring units derived from the compounds synthesized in examples 1 and 2 of the instant specification: PNG media_image1.png 90 617 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 87 612 media_image2.png Greyscale .] Claims 10-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-9 and 16-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Aridomi et al (WO 2013/015121; English language equivalent US 2014/0134540 is cited herein) in view of Tabata et al (US 2005/0287655). As to claims 1-9 and 16-18 and the elected species: Aridomi discloses a polyurethane or polyester obtained by reacting a diol of formula (I) (copied below) with a polyisocyanate or polycarboxylic acid [0012]: PNG media_image3.png 131 332 media_image3.png Greyscale wherein “B” is a monovalent organic group including at least one functional group. Aridomi names several functional groups, including “a hydroxyl group” [0017, 0064]. A polymer formed from reaction of Aridomi’s compound of formula (I) with a polyfunctional comonomer (polyisocyanate or polycarboxylic acid) has recurring units derived from the compound of formula (I) above. Aridomi discloses that the diol compound of formula (I) is obtained by reacting a compound of formula (1) with a compound of formula (2) [0052-3]: PNG media_image4.png 143 354 media_image4.png Greyscale Examples of compounds represented by formula (1) taught by Aridomi include mevalonolactone [0061]: PNG media_image5.png 91 321 media_image5.png Greyscale Aridomi further discloses examples of compounds according to formula (2) in [0087], including several compounds wherein “B-NH2” comprises a linear alkylene group with the NH2 at one terminal of the alkylene, and a functional group taught in [0064] at the other terminal of the alkylene. See, e.g.: PNG media_image6.png 129 279 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 158 277 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 164 271 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 105 285 media_image9.png Greyscale PNG media_image10.png 96 255 media_image10.png Greyscale Aridomi teaches an example of a compound according to formula (I) having the structure (a)-5 [0091]: PNG media_image11.png 119 326 media_image11.png Greyscale The reactant compounds of formulas (1) and (2) disclosed by Aridomi which result in a diol having a structure according to (a)-5 are (1)-5 in [0061] (mevalonolactone) and (2)-6 in [0087] (copied below): PNG media_image5.png 91 321 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 67 250 media_image12.png Greyscale The compound of (a)-5 taught by Aridomi differs from the instant elected species of formula XXIVb because the instant species has hydroxyl (OH) as a functional group where Aridomi’s (a)-5 has carboxyl (CO2H) as a functional group. Aridomi fails to exemplify a reactant according to “B-NH2” which comprises hydroxyl (i.e., OH), as named in [0064], as the functional group at the terminal of the alkylene group opposite the NH2 group. However, given that hydroxyl is named by Aridomi in [0064] along with types of functional groups shown in the compound examples in [0087], one having ordinary skill in the art would have at least envisaged a hydroxy-functional reactant compound according to Aridomi’s B-NH2 which is analogous to those shown in [0087], i.e., comprising a linear alkylene group with the NH2 at one terminal of the alkylene, and a hydroxy (OH) functional group as named in [0064] at the other terminal of the alkylene. When forming a compound according to Aridomi’s formula (I), the person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to utilize a compound according to Aridomi’s formula 2 containing any appropriate kind of functional group named by Aridomi in [0064] in order to impart a desired kind of functionality to the ultimately obtained polyurethane. It would have been obvious to the person having ordinary skill in the art, therefore, to have formed polymer derived from a compound analogous to Aridomi’s compound of formula (a)-5: PNG media_image13.png 140 357 media_image13.png Greyscale by substituting the carboxyl (CO2H) group (the group shown circled above) for any other type of functional group named by Aridomi, including a hydroxyl (OH) group in order to impart OH functionality to the obtained polymer. A compound analogous to formula (a)-5 wherein the (CO2H) group has been substituted for a hydroxyl (OH) group has a structure according to instant formula XXIVb, wherein R1 is H, R2 is a C1 alkyl, the internal Y is N(H), the terminal Y is O, and Q is an unsubstituted hydrocarbylene (i.e., a linear C2 alkylene). As to the recitation that the polymer is biobased and derived from a ring-opened biobased mevalonolactone: Aridomi suggests a compound which is derived from mevalonolactone, as set forth above. However, Aridomi fails to specifically teach utilizing “biobased” mevalonolactone. Tabata teaches that mevalonic acid can be efficiently biosynthesized from a microorganism utilizing carbon sources such as glucose (abstract), [0108], [0153]. Tabata teaches that previously reported methods of producing naturally occurring mevalonic acid required a long cultivation time and the yield from the sugar was low [0005]. The method disclosed by Tabata is an extremely efficient process for producing mevalonic acid from an inexpensive raw material [0006-7, 0178]. Tabata further teaches that the acid form and lactone form can be converted to each other [0003]. When preparing a polymer from a compound derived from mevalonolactone, as disclosed by Aridomi, the person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to source or prepare bioderived starting materials in order to utilize inexpensive raw materials, to decrease reliance on non-renewable resources (fossil feedstocks) and decrease environmental impact. It would have been obvious to the person having ordinary skill in the art, therefore, to have prepared a polymer from a mevalonolactone-derived compound, as suggested by Aridomi, utilizing biobased mevalonolactone (such as taught by Tabata) as the starting reactant compound (1)-5 (including starting material derived mostly or entirely from biobased sources), thereby arriving at a biobased polymer according to claims 1-9 and 16-18 (including polymer wherein the starting material has a biobased content within the ranges recited in claims 6-9). Alternatively, as to embodiments encompassed by claims 1, 3-9, 16 and 17 wherein Y can be -N(R3): Modified Aridomi suggests a biobased polymer, as set forth above. As discussed above, Aridomi teaches that in the reactant of formula (2), desired functionality is easily imparted to the polyurethane by using an organic group containing a functional group as the monovalent organic group represented by B [0055]. Aridomi teaches several preferred examples of functional groups, including amino [0064], and teaches that examples of preferred amino groups include N-alkylamino and N,N-dialkylamino groups [0078]. Aridomi specifically names the following reactant of formula 2 which contains an N,N-dialkylamino group (i.e., dimethylamino): PNG media_image14.png 79 318 media_image14.png Greyscale [0087]. Aridomi fails to specifically name a reactant of formula 2 which contains an N-alkylamino group rather than an N,N-dialkylamino group. However, given Aridomi’s teaching in [0078] that preferred amino groups include both N-alkylamino and N,N-dialkylamino groups, and given that Aridomi specifically teaches methylamino and ethylamino as preferred amino groups [0078], the person having ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to substitute the N,N-dialkylamino group in Aridomi’s reactant of formula (2)-17 for an N-alkylamino group named by Aridomi, including methylamino or ethylamino, in order to provide the corresponding specific functionality to the ultimately obtained polyurethane, depending on the intended application. The resulting methylamino or ethylamino-containing reactant would have one of the following structures, as drawn by the examiner: PNG media_image15.png 123 215 media_image15.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to the person having ordinary skill in the art, therefore, to have prepared a biobased polyurethane from biosynthesized mevalonolactone of formula (1)-5 and a reactant of formula (2) (i.e., B-NH2), as suggested by modified Aridomi, utilizing a formula (2) reactant having any type of functionality named by Aridomi, including a methylamino or ethylamino-containing reactant as shown above. The diol resulting from the reaction of (1)-5 with the above methylamino-group-containing reactant as formula (2) has a structure shown below (as drawn by the examiner): PNG media_image16.png 169 366 media_image16.png Greyscale , which corresponds to instant formula XXIVb, wherein R1 is H, R2 is a C1 alkyl, the internal Y is N(H), the terminal Y is N(R3) where R3 is C1 alkyl, and Q is a linear hydrocarbyl (i.e., a C2 alkylene group). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RACHEL KAHN whose telephone number is (571)270-7346. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday, 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RACHEL KAHN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674027
Polymerized high-molecular-weight sterically hindered amine and preparation method thereof
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12650646
PHOTOSENSITIVE POLYIMIDE COMPOSITIONS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643981
UNSATURATED CYCLIC ANHYDRIDE END CAPPED POLYIMIDES AND POLYAMIC ACIDS AND PHOTOSENSITIVE COMPOSITIONS THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636372
IMMOLATIVE CELL-PENETRATING COMPLEXES FOR NUCLEIC ACID DELIVERY TO THE LUNG
2y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12612491
High Molecular Weight Polyamides and CoPolyamides with Uniform RV and Low Gel Content
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
27%
Grant Probability
44%
With Interview (+16.2%)
3y 8m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 664 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month