Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/609,695

LIFT BAG SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANCHOR TESTING AND/OR REMOVAL

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 20, 2023 — provisional 63/453,239
Examiner
VASUDEVA, AJAY
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Other Lab LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
557 granted / 790 resolved
+18.5% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
61.8%
+21.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 790 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12-16 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(A1) as being anticipated by Low (US 6,880,479 B2). Low discloses a method of removal of an anchor [26] in a substrate within a body of water, the method comprising: introducing fluid into a lift bag system to increase buoyancy of the lift bag system within the body of water (see the abstract), the buoyancy of the lift bag system causing testing and/or removal of the anchor from the substrate within the body of water, the lift bag system comprising: a lift bag body [20] that includes a lift bag top end and one or more sidewalls that define a lift bag cavity, the lift bag body configured to hold a volume of fluid within the lift bag cavity, wherein the introducing fluid into the lift bag system comprises introducing fluid into the lift bag cavity to increase buoyancy of the lift bag body within the body of water to cause testing and/or removal of the anchor from the substrate within the body of water. The lift bag system further comprises a tube [62], which is broadly considered to be a compression tube, extending between a top end attached to an air compressor and a bottom end, an attachment point [73], and a plurality of bridles [64, 77, 70] (see col. 4, lines 11-13; lines 18-22 and lines 42-43). Re claim 13, the lift bag system is fixed at a position along an anchor line [40], wherein fixing the lift bag system at the position along the anchor line includes fixing the anchor line at the attachment point such that the lift bag system is securely coupled to the anchor line at the attachment point. Re claim 14, introducing fluid into the lift bag system increases buoyancy of the lift bag system within the body of water and generates a load or force on the anchor to cause the testing of the anchor and/or removal of the anchor from the substrate within the body of water. Re claim 15, the lift bag body has a top face plane that is capable of being positioned parallel to a main axis of the compression tube. Re claim 16, fluid is introduced into the lift bag system via a fluid line [24]. Re claim 18, when the lift bag body is in deflated state, the compression tube bottom end is capable of being positioned so that it extends below the lift bag body (see Fig 9). Re claim 19, when the lift bag body is in deflated state, it can be positioned within the boat so that the attachment point is disposed at or proximate to the compression tube top end and disposed above or proximate to the lift bag top end. Claims 12-14, 16-18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(A1) as being anticipated by Sturtevant (US 2,451,002 A). Low discloses a method of removal of a load [9] in a substrate within a body of water, wherein the load is broadly considered to be an anchor, the method comprising: introducing fluid into a lift bag system to increase buoyancy of the lift bag system within the body of water, the buoyancy of the lift bag system causing testing and/or removal of the anchor from the substrate within the body of water, the lift bag system comprising: a lift bag body [1] that includes a lift bag top end and one or more sidewalls that define a lift bag cavity, the lift bag body configured to hold a volume of fluid within the lift bag cavity, wherein the introducing fluid into the lift bag system comprises introducing fluid into the lift bag cavity to increase buoyancy of the lift bag body within the body of water to cause testing and/or removal of the anchor from the substrate within the body of water. The lift bag system further comprises a tube [19], which is broadly considered to be a compression tube, extending between a top end and a bottom end, an attachment point [7], and a plurality of bridles [4]. Re claim 13, the lift bag system is fixed at a position along an anchor line [8], wherein fixing the lift bag system at the position along the anchor line includes fixing the anchor line at the attachment point such that the lift bag system is securely coupled to the anchor line at the attachment point. Re claim 14, introducing fluid into the lift bag system increases buoyancy of the lift bag system within the body of water and generates a load or force on the anchor to cause the testing of the anchor and/or removal of the anchor from the substrate within the body of water. Re claim 16, fluid is introduced into the lift bag system via a fluid line [12, 15]. Re claim 17, the compression tube extends through a central location of the lift bag body. Re claim 18, the compression tube bottom end extends below the lift bag body. Re claim 20, the plurality of bridles is coupled to the compression tube bottom end via a connector [5, 20] and top bridle ends are coupled to respective locations at the lift bag body. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Brown (US 20070264890), Holmes (US 5690047), Puchois (US 3950806), and Bruno (US 2870730) each shows inflatable lift bag systems capable of lifting anchors from a bottom of a body of water. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AJAY VASUDEVA whose telephone number is (571)272-6689. The examiner can normally be reached 6:00 am - 3:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marc Jimenez can be reached at 571-272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AJAY VASUDEVA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662217
COUPLER FOR ATTACHING AN ACCESSORY TO A BOAT RAIL
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12643655
Airborne Vehicle With Multi-Airfoil Tail
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643634
LIFESAVING BOAT HULL HANDLE SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637282
MODULAR CABIN TRANSFER DEVICE SUITABLE FOR LARGE LUXURY CRUISE SHIPS
2y 9m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630261
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENHANCED MARINE VESSEL EFFICIENCY USING INTEGRATED HULL OPTIMIZATIONS
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 6m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 790 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month