Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/609,796

UPLINK TRANSMISSION WITH ORTHOGONAL COVER CODES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Examiner
HOANG, THAI D
Art Unit
2463
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
567 granted / 655 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6-8, 10-14, 17 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Karaki et al (“Karaki”), US Pub. 2022/0045805. Regarding claims 1 and 20, Karaki discloses a method and device for transmitting feedback signaling based on a received control information message. The device comprises one or more memories storing processor-executable code; and one or more processors coupled with the one or more memories (fig. 9, p. [0093]: radio node 10 comprises a controller/processing circuitry 20 connected to a memory. The memory inherently comprises executable codes) and individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive control signaling that schedules one or more uplink messages for transmission by the UE (abstract; [0005]-[0006], [0008]-[0009], [0011]: A receiving radio node receives control information message for scheduling multiple data transmissions), wherein the control signaling that schedules the one or more uplink messages also indicates one or more orthogonal cover code parameters for the one or more uplink messages (see tables 1-5: time domain resource allocation parameters); and transmit, based at least in part on the control signaling, the one or more uplink messages using an orthogonal cover code in accordance with the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters (abstract; [0005]-[0006], [0008]-[0009], [0011]: transmitting feedback signaling based on a received control information message). Regarding claim 6, Karaki discloses wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code (fig. 9, p. [0093]: radio node 10 comprises a controller/processing circuitry 20 which executes codes stored in the memory) to cause the UE to: receive radio resource control signaling that indicates a spreading factor for the orthogonal cover code (p. [0095], [0097], [0101], [0104]: spreading information). Regarding claim 7, Karaki discloses wherein, to indicate the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters, the control signaling indicates a row within a time domain resource allocation table, the row corresponding to the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters (see tables 1-5: time domain resource allocation parameters). Regarding claims 8 and 12, Karaki discloses wherein the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters corresponding to the row within the time domain resource allocation table comprise a spreading factor for the orthogonal cover code, an orthogonal cover code index corresponding to the orthogonal cover code, or both (see tables 1-5: time domain resource allocation parameters). Regarding claims 10, 17 and 19, Karaki discloses wherein, to indicate the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters, the control signaling indicates a row within an orthogonal cover code table, the row comprising the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters (see tables 1-5: time domain resource allocation parameters). Regarding claim 11, Karaki discloses wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively further operable to execute the code (fig. 9, p. [0093]: radio node 10 comprises a controller/processing circuitry 20 which executes codes stored in the memory) to cause the UE to: receive, within the control signaling, an indication of a row within a time domain resource allocation table, wherein the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to transmit the one or more uplink messages further in accordance with one or more parameters corresponding to the row within the time domain resource allocation table, and wherein the orthogonal cover code table is separate from the time domain resource allocation table (see tables 1-5: time domain resource allocation parameters). Regarding claim 13, Karaki discloses wherein, to transmit the one or more uplink messages, the one or more processors are individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: transmit the one or more uplink messages via a physical uplink shared channel (p. [0040]: Time domain resources for a scheduled PUSCH may be indicated to the UE). Regarding claim 14, Karaki discloses a method and device for transmitting feedback signaling based on a received control information message. The device comprises one or more memories storing processor-executable code; and one or more processors coupled with the one or more memories (fig. 10, p. [0094]: radio network node 100 comprises a controller/processing circuitry 120 connected to a memory. The memory inherently comprises executable codes) and individually or collectively operable to execute the code to cause the UE to: receive control signaling that schedules one or more uplink messages for transmission by the UE (abstract; [0005]-[0006], [0008]-[0009], [0011]: A receiving radio node receives control information message for scheduling multiple data transmissions), wherein the control signaling that schedules the one or more uplink messages also indicates one or more orthogonal cover code parameters for the one or more uplink messages (see tables 1-5: time domain resource allocation parameters); and transmit, based at least in part on the control signaling, the one or more uplink messages using an orthogonal cover code in accordance with the one or more orthogonal cover code parameters (abstract; [0005]-[0006], [0008]-[0009], [0011]: transmitting feedback signaling based on a received control information message). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 9, 15-16, 18, objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THAI D HOANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3184. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30 am-18:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Asad Nawaz can be reached at (571) 272-3988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. THAI HOANG D. Primary Examiner Art Unit 2463 /THAI DINH HOANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2463
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
May 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676725
NETWORK WITH PILOT TONE OVERLAP AVOIDANCE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671645
OPTIMAL AP CONNECTION METHOD AND SYSTEM USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING TO IMPROVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LATENCY OF IoT DEVICES
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12641649
RANDOM ACCESS CHANNEL COLLISION DURING TIMING ADJUSTMENT ACQUISITION FOR LAYER 1 OR LAYER 2 TRIGGERED MOBILITY
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641439
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RADIO RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND ADMISSION CONTROL FOR A RADIO ACCESS NETWORK BASED ON PER-USER EQUIPMENT FACTORS
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12621825
COMPACT SCHEDULING REQUESTS IN SIDELINK
4y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-1.9%)
2y 11m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month