Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/610,278

METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 24, 2021 — CN 202111119648.7 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, CHONG G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apogee Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
366 granted / 438 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
475
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 438 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-3, 6-10, 12-16, 19 and 20 are subject to examination and rejected. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Objections Claims 1, 8 and 14 are objected to because of the following informalities: the claims recite (ii) is associated with HARK-ACK information without scheduling a PDSCH reception. HARK-ACK should be HARQ-ACK. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6-10, 12-16, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhang (US PGPub 2025/0106851). Regarding claims 1, 8 and 14, Zhang teaches a user equipment (UE) for wireless communications (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the UE), comprising: a transceiver; and a processor (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the UE); wherein the transceiver and the processor are configured to: receive a Downlink Control Information (DCI) format including a Downlink Assignment Index (DAI) field (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the UE is scheduled for a PUSCH transmission by a DCI format including UL DAI); and transmit a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH), wherein the PUSCH transmission does not include multiplexed Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request Acknowledgement (HARQ-ACK) information (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the UE does not multiplex HARQ-ACK information including dynamically scheduled PDSCH and/or indicating SPS PDSCH release on the PUSCH) if: (i) the DAI field has a value equal to 4 (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the DAI field value being 4); (ii) the UE has not received any Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) within a monitoring occasion for the DCI format (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the UE does not receive within the PDCCH monitoring occasions any DCI format for scheduling PDSCH receptions); and (iii) a network node does not provide HARQ-ACK information in response to a semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) reception to be multiplexed in the PUSCH (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, The UE does not receive … indicating SPS PDSCH release on any serving cell c); wherein the DCI format either: (i) schedules a PDSCH reception or (ii) is associated with HARQ-ACK information without scheduling a PDSCH reception (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, any DCI format for scheduling PDSCH receptions). Regarding claims 2, 9 and 15, Zhang teaches wherein a received scheduled PDSCH transmission is not associated with disabled HARQ-ACK information (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, If the UE is not provided a CBG transmission parameter (for example, the parameter PDSCH-CodeBlockGroupTransmission)). Regarding claims 3, 10 and 16, Zhang teaches wherein a received schedule PDSCH transmission includes one or more transport blocks (TBs) for a HARQ process associated with disabled HARQ-ACK information (Zhang, see paragraph 0024, HARQ-ACK feedback based on code block groups (CBGs) may also be used in 5G in addition to the HARQ-ACK feedback scheme with transport blocks (TBs) as granularity in an existing LTE system). Regarding claims 6, 12 and 19, Zhang teaches wherein radio resource control (RRC) signaling configures the UE to associate a HARQ process with disabled HARQ-ACK information (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, If the UE is not provided a CBG transmission parameter (for example, the parameter PDSCH-CodeBlockGroupTransmission)). Regarding claims 7, 13 and 20, Zhang teaches wherein the transceiver and processor are further configured to: in response to not multiplexing HARQ-ACK information in a first PUSCH, transmit the first PUSCH without HARQ-ACK information (Zhang, see paragraph 0216, the UE does not multiplex HARQ-ACK information including dynamically scheduled PDSCH and/or indicating SPS PDSCH release on the PUSCH). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG G KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-0619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri @ 9am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas R. Taylor can be reached at 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG G KIM/ Examiner, Art Unit 2443 /NICHOLAS R TAYLOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683912
MULTI-USER FLEXIBLE ETHERNET FINE GRANULARITY TIME SLOT ALLOCATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676796
Method for switching a Network slice, terminal, storage medium and electronic device
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677330
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING DATA TRANSMISSION ACCORDING TO QUALITY OF SERVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671633
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF PACKET FLOW IN A PACKET-SWITCHED COMMUNICATION NETWORK BY A USER COMMUNICATION DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12648029
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 438 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month