Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/610,418

Methods and Systems for Controlling Blood Pressure

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Examiner
WELCH, WILLOW GRACE
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Backbeat Medical LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
22 granted / 49 resolved
-25.1% vs TC avg
Strong +50% interview lift
Without
With
+50.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
88
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 49 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 18-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 11,969,598. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claim of the instant application is anticipated by the claim of U.S Patent No. 11,969,598. Instant Application 18/610418 U.S. Patent No. 11,969,598 Claim 18 Claim 1 A system for reducing blood pressure in a patient, the system comprising: A system for reducing blood pressure in a patient, the system comprising: a stimulation circuit configured to deliver a stimulation pulse to at least one cardiac chamber of a heart of the patient; a stimulation circuit configured to deliver a stimulation pulse to at least one cardiac chamber of a heart of the patient; a blood pressure sensor configured to sense the patient’s blood pressure; and a sensor configured to sense parameters indicative of blood pressure of the patient; and at least one controller configured to execute delivery of one or more stimulation patterns of stimulation pulses to the at least one cardiac chamber over a time interval, at least one controller configured to execute delivery of one or more stimulation patterns of stimulation pulses to the at least one cardiac chamber over a time interval, wherein a first stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a first reduction amount, wherein a first stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a first reduction amount, wherein a second stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a second reduction amount, wherein a second stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a second reduction amount, wherein the first reduction amount is greater than the second reduction amount, and wherein the first reduction amount is greater than the second reduction amount, wherein the second reduction amount is greater than zero. wherein the second reduction amount is greater than zero, Claims 18-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-3 of U.S. Patent No. 11,426,589. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claim of the instant application is anticipated by the claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,426,589. Instant Application 18/610418 U.S. Patent No. 11,426,589 Claim 18 Claim 1 A system for reducing blood pressure in a patient, the system comprising: A system for reducing blood pressure in a patient having a pretreatment blood pressure, the system comprising: a stimulation circuit configured to deliver a stimulation pulse to at least one cardiac chamber of a heart of the patient; a stimulation circuit configured to deliver a stimulation pulse to at least one cardiac chamber of a heart of the patient; a blood pressure sensor configured to sense the patient’s blood pressure; and Claim 3 a blood pressure sensor configured to sense the patient's blood pressure at least one controller configured to execute delivery of one or more stimulation patterns of stimulation pulses to the at least one cardiac chamber over a time interval, at least one controller configured to execute delivery of one or more stimulation patterns of stimulation pulses to the at least one cardiac chamber over a time interval, wherein a first stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a first reduction amount, wherein a first stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a first reduction amount, wherein a second stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a second reduction amount, wherein a second stimulation pattern of the one or more stimulation patterns reduces the blood pressure of the patient by a second reduction amount, wherein the first reduction amount is greater than the second reduction amount, and wherein the first reduction amount is greater than the second reduction amount, wherein the second reduction amount is greater than zero. wherein the second reduction amount is greater than zero, Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Examiner has not found any references that teach or suggest the limitations recited in claims 1 and 10. Specifically, Examiner has not found prior art that teaches: "...determine a first blood pressure change value based on the second value of the parameter and the first value of the parameter, deliver a second stimulation pattern to the at least one cardiac chamber of the heart to reduce blood pressure, receive from the sensor, during delivery of the second stimulation pattern, a third value of the parameter, determine a second blood pressure change value based on the third value of the parameter and the first value of the parameter, compare the second blood pressure change value to the first blood pressure change value, and based on the comparison, adjust the second stimulation pattern to provide an adjusted blood pressure change value." Mika et al (US 2014/0180353) discloses a loop (Fig. 8) where stimulation is delivered, parameters are sensed/analyzed, and adjustments are made to the stimulation based off of the analysis. Mika further discloses: [0166] step 604 may include the following: comparing sensed parameter values to a target; comparing sensed parameters between two or more stimulation patterns; comparing calculated values (e.g., the k constant) relating to two or more stimulation patterns; and comparing additional sensed parameters between two or more stimulation patterns. While Mika does teach comparing sensed blood pressure parameters between a first and second stimulation pattern, Mika fails to disclose determining blood pressure change values based off of that comparison and then adjusting stimulation based off of those blood pressure change values. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLOW GRACE WELCH whose telephone number is (703)756-1596. The examiner can normally be reached Usually M-F 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WILLOW GRACE WELCH/Examiner, Art Unit 3792 /Benjamin J Klein/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12551163
System and Method for Noninvasive Sleep Monitoring and Reporting
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12551165
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM LEAD GUIDE SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12508425
BILATERAL VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12427314
NEUROMODULATION OF THE GLOSSOPHARYNGEAL NERVE TO IMPROVE SLEEP DISORDERED BREATHING
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Patent 12419713
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH SENSOR ALIGNED CABLE GUIDE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+50.5%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 49 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month