Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/610,521

BAG COMPONENT FOR A PRODUCT, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A BAG COMPONENT, AND FORMING TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Priority
Mar 21, 2023 — EU 23 163 097.1
Examiner
ATTEL, NINA KAY
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
B. Braun Melsungen AG
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
70%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allowance Rate
248 granted / 598 resolved
-28.5% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
645
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.8%
+13.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 598 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on August 24, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fish et al. (US 2011/0044566 A1, hereinafter Fish). Regarding claim 1, Fish teaches a bag component for a product, the bag component comprising a first plastic film (102) and a second plastic film (104), the first plastic film and the second plastic film being placed on top of each other, wherein a product space is delimited by mutually opposite sides of the first plastic film and the second plastic film and a boundary, wherein the first plastic film and the second plastic film are joined to each other along a first portion (110, 112, 114) of the boundary, wherein the first plastic film and the second plastic film are not directly joined to each other to form a reception space (124) for the product and/or an insert component along a second portion (120, 122) of the boundary, and wherein: at least one of the first plastic film and the second plastic film comprises at least one recess (140, 142,144 and the like) in or adjacent to the second portion of the boundary and at a location where the first plastic film and the second plastic film are not directly joined to each other (FIG. 1-4, 20, 21, 25-33), and the mutually opposite sides of the first plastic film and the second plastic film forming the product space do not include any recesses (FIG. 1) (paragraphs 48-59, 62-64, 69-82, 85-91 and FIG. 1-4, 20, 21, 25-33). Regarding claim 2, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, wherein the at least one recess is cup-shaped (FIG. 21, 27-33). Regarding claim 3, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, wherein the at least one recess is grid-shaped (FIG. 21). Regarding claim 4, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, wherein the at least one recess comprises a plurality of recesses in or adjacent to the second portion of the boundary (FIG. 1-4, 20, 21, 25-33). Regarding claim 5, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein the plurality of recesses form a regular pattern or an irregular patter (FIG. 1-4, 20, 21, 25-33). Regarding claim 6, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein all of the plurality of recesses have a same geometry (FIG. 1, 20, 28-31). Regarding claim 7, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein at least two of the plurality of recesses have a different geometry (FIG. 26, 27, 32, 33). Regarding claim 8, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein adjacent recesses of the plurality of recesses are spaced from one another (FIG. 21, 27, 29, 31, 33). Regarding claim 9, Fish teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein the first plastic film and the second plastic film each comprise at least one of the plurality of recesses in or adjacent to the second portion of the boundary (FIG. 1, 21, 27, 29, 31, 33). Claims 1, 2, 4-6 and 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Muth (WO 2007/088026 A1). Regarding claim 1, Muth teaches a bag component for a product, the bag component comprising a first plastic film (120) and a second plastic film (130), the first plastic film and the second plastic film being placed on top of each other (Fig. 2-6), wherein a product space is delimited by mutually opposite sides of the first plastic film and the second plastic film and a boundary (Fig. 2), wherein the first plastic film and the second plastic film are joined to each other along a first portion (230) of the boundary, wherein the first plastic film and the second plastic film are not directly joined to each other to form a reception space for the product and/or an insert component along a second portion (240) of the boundary, and wherein: at least one of the first plastic film and the second plastic film comprises at least one recess (355, 385) in or adjacent to the second portion of the boundary and at a location where the first plastic film and the second plastic film are not directly joined to each other (Fig. 6), and the mutually opposite sides of the first plastic film and the second plastic film forming the product space do not include any recesses (Fig. 2) (Translation and Fig. 2-6). Regarding claim 2, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, wherein the at least one recess is cup-shaped (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 4, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, wherein the at least one recess comprises a plurality of recesses in or adjacent to the second portion of the boundary (Fig. 2-6). Regarding claim 5, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein the plurality of recesses form a regular or irregular pattern (Fig. 2-6). Regarding claim 6, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein all of the plurality of recesses have a same geometry (Fig. 2-6). Regarding claim 8, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein adjacent recesses of the plurality of recesses are spaced from one another (Fig. 2-6). Regarding claim 9, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 4 above, wherein the first plastic film and the second plastic film each comprise at least one of the plurality of recesses in or adjacent to the second portion of the boundary (Fig. 2-6). Regarding claim 10, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, wherein said insert component (210, 250, 150, 155) is arranged in the reception space and fixed to the first plastic film and/or the second plastic film (Translation and Fig. 2-6). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Muth, as applied to claim 1 above, in view of Balteau et al. (US 5,431,496 A, hereinafter Balteau). Regarding claim 16, Muth teaches the bag component of claim 1 above, but fails to teach the first plastic film and the second plastic film being bonded to each other in the product space to define a plurality of product chambers within the product space. Balteau teaches an analogous bag component for a product comprising first and second films, wherein a product space is delimited by mutually opposite sides of the first plastic film and the second plastic film and a boundary. Balteau further teaches that it is known and desirable in the prior art to bond (22, 58) the first and second plastic film to each other in the product space to define a plurality of product chambers within the product space for enabling housing, mixing and dispensing of a plurality of products from a single bag component (column 2 line 10-column 5 lines 37 and FIG. 1-5). Accordingly, one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have found it obvious to modify Muth by bonding the first plastic film and the second plastic film to each other in the product space to define a plurality of product chambers within the product space, as taught by Balteau, for enabling housing, mixing and dispensing of a plurality of products from a single bag component. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed August 24, 2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NINA KAY ATTEL whose telephone number is (571)270-3972. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-4PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NINA K ATTEL/Examiner, Art Unit 3734 /NATHAN J NEWHOUSE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Feb 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767372
STORAGE BAG WITH ELASTIC INTERLOCK CLOSURE
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12752991
HEMP PAPER BAGS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741779
PACKAGING BOX AND CARDBOARD STRUCTURE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12722883
BAG CONFIGURATION FOR PAIL
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722877
COLLAPSIBLE, REUSABLE BULK SOLID CONTAINER
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
70%
With Interview (+28.0%)
3y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 598 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month