Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/610,774

Musical Instrument and Stand

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Examiner
KRYUKOVA, ERIN
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rainstick Dreams LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 618 resolved
-3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
639
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 618 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applications filed after March 15th 2013 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wolff (US 2004/0040923). With regards to Claim 20, Wolff discloses a stand for supporting an elongated musical instrument comprising a first end, a second end, and a sidewall extending therebetween (the examiner notes that the limitation that the stand is for supporting an elongated musical instrument is intended use of the stand), the stand comprising: a plurality of elongated members [18] (see paragraph 25 and Figure 1); and a plurality of hubs (comprising the hubs formed between adjacent portions [12,22], see Figure 1) comprising multiple channels [16] configured to receive ends of the plurality of elongated members [18] (see paragraph 25 and Figure 1; at the hubs channels [16] are formed to receive an end of the elongated members [18] therein), wherein the plurality of elongated members [18] and the plurality of hubs are connected together forming an open frame configured for the elongated musical instrument to be inserted into or through the frame and to support the elongated musical instrument in an upright orientation (see paragraph and Figure 4; the elongated members [18] joined with the channels [16] of the hubs substantially form an open frame into which an elongated member [24] can be inserted into and supported therein in an upright position (see paragraph 26 and Figure 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: With regards to Claim 1 and claims depending therefrom, the prior art of record fails to disclose or fairly suggest a musical instrument comprising: a housing comprising an open first end, an open second end, and a sidewall extending therebetween, the housing defining an internal volume, a first end cap covering the open first end of the housing, a second end cap covering the open second end of the housing, a barrier disc positioned in the internal volume dividing the internal volume into an upper portion and a lower portion, a first plurality of ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, a second plurality of ribs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument arranged in a second pattern, a first particle fill material in the upper portion of the internal volume, and a second particle fill material in the lower portion of the internal volume, as specifically called for in the claimed combinations. The closest prior art, Rudkin (US 4,306,485) does not disclose a first plurality of ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, a second plurality of ribs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument arranged in a second pattern, as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant's own disclosure to modify the Rudkin reference in the manner required by the claims. The closest prior art, Waldo (US 5,212,331) does not disclose a barrier disc positioned in the internal volume dividing the internal volume into the upper portion and the lower portion, a first plurality of ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, a first particle fill material in the upper portion of the internal volume, and a second particle fill material in the lower portion of the internal volume, as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant's own disclosure to modify the Waldo reference in the manner required by the claims. While a musical instrument comprising a housing with a sidewall extending between first and second open ends of a housing, a first and second end cap closing the first and second open ends, a plurality of ribs formed within an interior volume of the housing, and a particle fill material disposed within the interior volume of the housing, the combination of a barrier disc positioned in the internal volume dividing the internal volume into an upper portion and a lower portion, a first plurality of ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, a second plurality of ribs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument arranged in a second pattern, a first particle fill material in the upper portion of the internal volume, and a second particle fill material in the lower portion of the internal volume is not disclosed in the prior art of record as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant's own disclosure to modify the prior art of record in the manner required by the claims. With regards to Claim 19, the prior art of record fails to disclose or fairly suggest a musical instrument comprising a housing comprising an upper end, a lower end, and a sidewall extending therebetween, the housing defining an internal volume, a barrier disc positioned in the internal volume dividing the internal volume into an upper portion and a lower portion, a plurality of upper ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, at least two upper open discs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument, the plurality of upper ribs are disposed between the at least two upper open discs, upper particle fill material enclosed in the upper portion of the internal volume, a plurality of lower ribs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument arranged in a second pattern, at least two lower open discs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument, the plurality of lower ribs are disposed between the at least two lower open discs, and lower particle fill material enclosed in the lower portion of the internal volume, as specifically called for in the claimed combinations. The closest prior art, Rudkin (US 4,306,485) does not disclose a plurality of upper ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, at least two upper open discs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument, the plurality of upper ribs are disposed between the at least two upper open discs, a plurality of lower ribs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument arranged in a second pattern, at least two lower open discs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument, the plurality of lower ribs are disposed between the at least two lower open discs, as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant's own disclosure to modify the Rudkin reference in the manner required by the claims. The closest prior art, Waldo (US 5,212,331) does not disclose a barrier disc positioned in the internal volume dividing the internal volume into the upper portion and the lower portion, the upper particle fill material is enclosed in the upper portion of the internal volume, and the lower particle fill material is enclosed in the lower portion of the internal volume, as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant's own disclosure to modify the Waldo reference in the manner required by the claims. While a musical instrument comprising a housing with a sidewall extending between first and second open ends of a housing, a first and second end cap closing the first and second open ends, a plurality of ribs formed within an interior volume of the housing, and a particle fill material disposed within the interior volume of the housing, the combination of a barrier disc positioned in the internal volume dividing the internal volume into an upper portion and a lower portion, a plurality of upper ribs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument arranged in a first pattern, at least two upper open discs positioned in the upper portion of the musical instrument, the plurality of upper ribs are disposed between the at least two upper open discs, upper particle fill material enclosed in the upper portion of the internal volume, a plurality of lower ribs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument arranged in a second pattern, at least two lower open discs positioned in the lower portion of the musical instrument, wherein the plurality of lower ribs are disposed between the at least two lower open discs, and lower particle fill material enclosed in the lower portion of the internal volume, is not disclosed in the prior art of record as required by the claim and there is no motivation absent the applicant's own disclosure to modify the prior art of record in the manner required by the claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. In addition to the prior art discussed in this action, the applicant is directed to form 892, and particularly the references Lawson (US 5,505,114), which discloses a musical instrument formed of an elongated housing having open ends closed by end caps and a sidewall forming a hollow interior into which a plurality of ribs are disposed, a particle fill material disposed in the interior, Okamoto (US 2009/0286656), which discloses an open frame formed of elongated members connecting at hubs, and 中尾 誠 (JP 3229112), which discloses an open frame formed of elongated members connecting at hubs. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIN KRYUKOVA whose telephone number is (571)272-3761. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9a.m. - 4p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jong-Suk (James) Lee can be reached at 5712727044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIN KRYUKOVA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601945
FRAME STRUCTURE, BACKLIGHT MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596275
PARTITIONING MEMBER, PLANAR LIGHT SOURCE, AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590684
LIGHT GUIDE WITH SINGLE OPTICAL CAVITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590687
LIGHTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591157
LIGHTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+29.0%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 618 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month