Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/610,838

VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Examiner
MORALES, OMAR
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
288 granted / 493 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 493 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to Applicants’ amendment received on September 30, 2025. Claim 1-8 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4, 5 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Limpibunterng et al. (CN 102264593 A), hereinafter “Limpibunterng”. Regarding claim 1, Limpibunterng discloses a vehicle control device to be mounted on a vehicle, the vehicle control device comprising: a processor and a memory storing instructions configured to implement: a target steering angle calculation unit configured to calculate a target steering angle according to a target position to which the vehicle is to be moved or a situation of a steering angle (paragraphs 144, 153, 155, 158, 171-178: “FIG. 9, the calculated target lateral acceleration GYTG (step S105), the ECU 100 based on the calculated target lateral acceleration GYTG to calculate the LKA for front wheel target steering angle 9LKA to FR (step S401). LKA of the calculated front wheel target steering angle [theta] LKA-FR, then ECU 100 of the LKA calculated by the front wheel target steering angle [theta] LKA-FR is stored in the original storage device (step S402). In addition, LKA for front wheel target steering angle eLKA-FR is the other of one example of the present invention relates to “first control target value””); a ratio determination unit configured to determine a ratio of steering angles of a front wheel and a rear wheel of the vehicle based on a front-rear acceleration of the vehicle (paragraphs 114, 119, 120 and 174-178: “In addition, previously storing the relationship between quantization shown in FIG. 18 LKA for rear wheel target steering angle map in the ROM of the ECU 100, in step S601, from the LKA by the rear wheel target steering angle map to select a suitable value. one relationship, relationship between the operation direction of the steering rear wheel and a steering operation direction of the front wheel, for example, according to the vehicle speed and the in-phase and reversed phase transformation can refer to FIG. 10 and FIG. 18 are suitable” and “In FIG. 17, the calculated target lateral acceleration GYTG, the ECU 100 based on the calculated target lateral acceleration GYTG to calculate the LKA for rear wheel target steering angle [theta] LKA-RR (step S601) and stores it (step S602). Here, referring to FIG. 18 to illustrate the target transverse acceleration GYTG and LKA for rear wheel target steering angle 0LKA relation of RR. Here, FIG. 18 is a LKA for rear wheel target steering angle 9LKA RR and target lateral relationship between the acceleration GYTG mode FIG” and “In addition, previously storing the relationship between quantization shown in FIG. 18 LKA for rear wheel target steering angle map in the ROM of the ECU 100, in step S601, from the LKA by the rear wheel target steering angle map to select a suitable value. one relationship, relationship between the operation direction of the steering rear wheel and a steering operation direction of the front wheel, for example, according to the vehicle speed and the in-phase and reversed phase transformation can refer to FIG. 10 and FIG. 18 are suitable”); a steering angle calculation unit configured to calculate, for the front wheel and the rear wheel, steering angles determined by multiplying the target steering angle by the ratio (paragraphs 171-178: “In FIG. 17, the calculated target lateral acceleration GYTG, the ECU 100 based on the calculated target lateral acceleration GYTG to calculate the LKA for rear wheel target steering angle [theta] LKA-RR (step S601) and stores it (step S602). Here, referring to FIG. 18 to illustrate the target transverse acceleration GYTG and LKA for rear wheel target steering angle 0LKA relation of RR. Here, FIG. 18 is a LKA for rear wheel target steering angle 9LKA RR and target lateral relationship between the acceleration GYTG mode FIG” and “In addition, previously storing the relationship between quantization shown in FIG. 18 LKA for rear wheel target steering angle map in the ROM of the ECU 100, in step S601, from the LKA by the rear wheel target steering angle map to select a suitable value. one relationship, relationship between the operation direction of the steering rear wheel and a steering operation direction of the front wheel, for example, according to the vehicle speed and the in-phase and reversed phase transformation can refer to FIG. 10 and FIG. 18 are suitable”); and a control unit configured to instruct the front wheel and the rear wheel about the calculated steering angles of the front wheel and the rear wheel (paragraphs 114, 119, 120 and 174-178). Regarding claim 4, Limpibunterng discloses the vehicle control device according to claim 1, wherein the control unit instructs the front wheel and the rear wheel about the steering angles substantially simultaneously (paragraphs 114, 119, 120 and 174-178). Regarding claim 5, Limpibunterng discloses the vehicle control device according to claim 1, further comprising: an abnormality determination unit configured to determine whether a driver is abnormal, wherein the target steering angle calculation unit calculates the target steering angle based on the target position to which the vehicle is to be evacuated when the abnormality determination unit determines that the driver is abnormal (paragraphs 114, 119, 120 and 174-178). Regarding claim 8, Limpibunterng discloses the vehicle control device according to claim 4, further comprising: an abnormality determination unit configured to determine whether a driver is abnormal, wherein the target steering angle calculation unit calculates the target steering angle based on the target position to which the vehicle is to be evacuated when the abnormality determination unit determines that the driver is abnormal (paragraphs 114, 119, 120 and 174-178). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, 6 and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicants’ remarks filed on September 30, 2025 have been fully considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the current rejection. Applicants’ amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicants are reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAR MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-5923. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay Low can be reached on (571)272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /O.M/Examiner, Art Unit 3747 /LINDSAY M LOW/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 11, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 30, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603101
MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR EVALUATING VEHICLE CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600409
WORK MACHINE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING WORK MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594984
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589751
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING TERRAIN-BASED LOCALIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12571334
CLOSING STRUCTURE FOR TUBE MEMBER AND ENGINE PROVIDED THEREWITH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+35.8%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 493 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month