Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/610,907

METHOD AND SYSTEM WITH VOLATILITY-BASED FLOW DRILL SCREW CONTROL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Examiner
COZART, JERMIE E
Art Unit
3799
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ford Motor Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
772 granted / 921 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
938
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§112
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 921 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 1-15 in the reply filed on 6/29/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that “examination without restriction between Inventions I and II would present an undue search burden”. This is not found persuasive because the inventions as claimed are drawn to different classes of inventions and require separate and distinct strategies which is burdensome upon the examiner. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 12-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 12 which is dependent from claim 10 recites the limitation, “wherein the trigger condition includes the value of volatility being within a predetermined range of a maximum volatility value” which is already recited as a trigger condition in independent claim 10. Claims 13 and 14 depend from improper dependent claim 12. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 and 15 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The references listed on the attached PTO-892 are cited to show processes for installing flow drill screws. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JERMIE E COZART whose telephone number is (571)272-4528. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30am - 7:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JERMIE E COZART/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3799 July 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703031
CUTTING TOOL FOR MACHINING FIBER COMPOSITE MATERIALS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697194
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING CROWN FOR DENTAL IMPLANT AND CROWN THEREBY
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691508
MACHINING TOOL FOR BOX-END WRENCH AND METHOD OF MACHINING BOX-END WRENCH BY USING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691490
A METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AN OBJECT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12661249
SYSTEMS FOR DRY TISSUE VALVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 7m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month