Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/612,404

Agricultural Working Tool

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 21, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2023 — DE 102023108337.6
Examiner
YOUNG, EDWIN
Art Unit
3655
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Claas Saulgau GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
858 granted / 938 resolved
+39.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 938 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is responsive to the amendment filed 9/23/2026. Claims 1-12 are currently pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the cooler" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It appears Claim 6 should be amended to depend from Claim 5 to provide support for this limitation (see, for reference, Claim 5, line 2, “a cooler”). Claim 9 recites the limitation "the cooler" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It appears Claim 9 should be amended to depend from Claim 5 to provide support for this limitation (see, for reference, Claim 5, line 2, “a cooler”). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-9, filed 9/23/2026, with respect to Claims 1-10 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The prior art rejections of Claims 1-10 have been withdrawn. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 7, 8 and 10-12 are allowed. Claims 6 and 9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not disclose nor render obvious an agricultural working tool characterized in that at least oil-carrying sub-assemblies of the cooling system resist pressure up to at least 200 bar, in combination with the other elements required by independent Claim 1. The prior art does not disclose nor render obvious an agricultural working tool characterized in that the cooling system resists pressure up to at least 200 bar, has a pipeline heat exchanger that includes at least one pipeline and is arranged in a coolant container, the at least one pipeline through which oil flows is cooled by coolant which flows through the coolant container, in combination with the other elements required by independent Claim 11. The prior art does not disclose nor render obvious an agricultural working tool characterized in that that the tool is a mower having at least one cross-conveyor in the form of a belt conveyor for mown harvested material, wherein the respective cross-conveyor has a hydraulic drive as a hydraulic power take-off member and the cooling system resists pressure up to at least 200 bar, has a pipeline heat exchanger that includes at least one pipeline and is arranged in a coolant container, the at least one pipeline through which oil flows is cooled by coolant which flows through the coolant container, in combination with the other elements required by independent Claim 12. One of ordinary skill in the art would have no rationale, absent hindsight, to modify the prior art to derive the claimed invention since the above-mentioned limitations, in combination with the other claim limitations, are considered new and nonobvious improvements over the prior art. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDWIN YOUNG whose telephone number is (571)272-4781. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:00 am - 6:00 pm (CST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob S Scott can be reached at (571)270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. EDWIN YOUNG Primary Examiner Art Unit 3655 /Edwin A Young/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 23, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767223
STEERING KNUCKLE, CORNER MODULE AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772423
VEHICLE DRIVE DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768664
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING VEHICLE WHEEL SLIPS
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12759433
TRACTION BATTERY PACK SUPPORT SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752640
CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A HYBRID VEHICLE WITH A DUAL VOLTAGE DIRECT CURRENT BUS
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 938 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month