Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/612,513

SYSTEM AND METHOD OF FORMING A MESH STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 21, 2024
Examiner
THROWER, LARRY W
Art Unit
1754
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lear Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
622 granted / 947 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
69 currently pending
Career history
1016
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 947 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-19, in the reply filed on December 18, 2025, is acknowledged. Claim 20 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1-11 and 13-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Antonyshyn (US 2012/0010711). Claim 1: Antonyshyn discloses a method including placing a mesh member in a cavity of a mold assembly including a forming surface (figs. 11, 13; ¶¶ 79-82, 91-92); adding liquid at a temperature above a first temperature threshold to the cavity, thereby softening the mesh member and conforming a shape of the member to the surface (¶¶ 81, 92); and cooling the mesh member in the mold assembly to set the shape of the mesh member to the forming surface (¶ 82). Claim 2: Antonyshyn discloses liquid being added to the cavity when the mold assembly is disposed in a tank (figs. 11, 13; external reservoir 430; thermal bath 530; ¶¶ 79-81, 91-92). Claim 3: Antonyshyn discloses at least a portion of the mold assembly being disposed in the tank when the mesh member is placed in the cavity of the mold assembly (fig. 11; ¶¶ 79-80). Claim 4: Antonyshyn discloses placing a portion of the mold assembly in the tank after placing the mesh member in the cavity (fig. 11; tool 400; ¶¶ 79-81). Claim 5: Antonyshyn discloses the tank includes liquid prior to placing a portion of the mold assembly (tool 400) in the tank (fig. 11; ¶¶ 79-81). Claim 6: Antonyshyn discloses placing a portion of the mold assembly in the tank including submerging a portion of the mold assembly (mold 410) in the tank (fig. 11; ¶¶ 79-81). Claim 7: Antonyshyn discloses adding liquid includes at least partially filling the tank with liquid after placing a portion of the mold assembly (mold 410) in the tank (fig. 11; ¶¶ 79-81). Claim 8: Antonyshyn discloses cooling the mesh member includes removing a portion of the mold assembly (tool 400) from the tank (¶ 82). Claim 9-10: Antonyshyn discloses forming tool 410 being brought into the cavity and forcing the liquid residing in the cavity into reservoir 435, and removing tool 410 from the cavity which would necessarily expose the mesh member to air that enters the cavity when tool 410 is removed from the tank (¶ 80). Claim 12: Antonyshyn discloses cooling the mesh member includes cooling the mesh member in the tank (¶ 82). Claim 14: Antonyshyn discloses cooling liquid in the tank and the cavity below a second temperature threshold, thereby cooling the mesh member in the mold assembly to set the shape of the mesh member to the forming surface (¶82). Claim 15: Antonyshyn discloses cooling the mesh member includes draining liquid from the cavity and adding liquid below a second temperature threshold to the tank so that liquid at least partially submerges at least a portion of the mold assembly (mold 410) and enters the cavity, thereby setting the shape of the mesh member to the forming surface (¶¶ 80-82). Claim 16: Antonyshyn discloses adding liquid includes filling the cavity with liquid and holding liquid in the cavity for a predetermined period of time (¶ 80; the predetermined period of time being the time required to at least contact and soften the mesh material). Claim 17: Antonyshyn discloses the liquid remaining in the cavity, and not exiting mold 410 when liquid is held in the cavity at least until tool 410 enters the cavity (fig. 11; ¶¶ 79-80). Claim 18: Antonyshyn discloses cooling the mesh member includes replacing liquid in the cavity with liquid at a temperature below a second temperature threshold that cools the mesh member in the mold assembly to set the shape of the mesh member to the forming surface (¶¶ 80-82). Claim 19: Antonyshyn discloses cooling the mesh member includes draining the cavity by inserting tool 400 into the cavity after holding the liquid in the cavity for the predetermined period of time, and then providing liquid at a temperature below a second temperature threshold into the cavity that cools the mesh member in a portion of the mold assembly (mold 410) to set the shape of the mesh member to the forming surface (¶¶ 80-82; the predetermined period of time being the time required to at least contact and soften the mesh material). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Antonyshyn (US 2012/0010711), as applied to claim 8 above. Antonyshyn discloses cooling the mesh member includes placing the member in a second tank that contains liquid comprising a temperature less than a second temperature threshold, wherein the liquid in the second tank cools the mesh member to set the shape of the mesh member to the forming surface (¶ 82), but is silent as to including at least a portion of the mold assembly. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the application to have included mold 410 during the immersion into the second tank in order to maintain the shape of the implant during cooling. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LARRY THROWER whose telephone number is (571)270-5517. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm MT M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Susan Leong can be reached at 571-270-1487. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LARRY W THROWER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600082
DISPENSING HEAD FOR CONTINUOUS FIBER REINFORCED FUSED FILAMENT TYPE ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12539670
Method and Device for Producing a Three-Dimensional Object in an Optically Reactive Starting Material
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12484588
Partially Transparent Disposable Piping Bag
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Patent 12478129
THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING ALONG A CURVED SURFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12427701
VEHICLE TRIM COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+12.4%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 947 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month