Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/612,897

MOISTURE BARRIER CARRIER TAPE AND LID FOR ELECTRONIC PARTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 21, 2024
Examiner
ZACHARIA, RAMSEY E
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
701 granted / 895 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
929
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.7%
-15.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 24 November 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 16-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 24 November 2025. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character not mentioned in the description: 40 in Figures 3 and 4. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 12, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Clerc (US 2024/0108544). Clerc is directed to packaging comprising a bottom part having a cavity and cover sheet, each formed from multi-layer films (paragraphs 0030-0034). The multi-layer film of the bottom part comprises at least five layers: an outer thermoformable layer, a cyclic olefin copolymer layer, an inner thermoformable layer, a barrier layer, and a sealing layer (paragraphs 0036-0041). The packaging may comprise a plurality of cavities (Figure 4). The outer and inner thermoformable layers may be formed of polystyrene (paragraphs 0048 and 0052). The barrier layer may be formed of polychlorotrifluoroethylene (paragraph 0058). The cover sheet comprise: a protective layer, a first barrier layer, an intermediate layer, a second barrier layer, and a sealing layer (paragraphs 0389-0395). The protective layer may be formed of polyethylene terephthalate or polyamide (paragraph 0397). The sealing layer may be formed of polyethylene (paragraph 0401). The second barrier layer may be polychlorotrifluoroethylene (paragraph 0404). Adhesive layers may be present between the layers of the bottom part and cover sheet, with polyurethane used as the adhesive (paragraphs 0432-0433). The bottom part having a cavity corresponds to the shaped container comprising one or more pockets of the claims. The sealing layer corresponds to the first base layer. The outer thermoformable layer corresponds to the second base layer. The barrier layer, which may be formed of polychlorotrifluoroethylene, corresponds to the first fluoropolymer layer. The cover sheet corresponds to the top cover of the claims. The protective layer, which may be formed from polyethylene terephthalate or polyamide, corresponds to the first support layer. The second barrier layer, which may be formed of polychlorotrifluoroethylene, corresponds to the second fluoropolymer layer. The sealing layer corresponds to the heat seal layer. The adhesive layers, which may be formed of polyurethane and provided between the layers of the bottom part and cover sheet, correspond to the intermediate adhesive layers of the shaped container and cover sheet. While Clerc does not illustrate an embodiment wherein the protective layers of the bottom part and cover sheet are formed of fluoropolymers, there is an explicit teaching that polychlorotrifluoroethylene may be used for barrier layers in both the bottom part and cover sheet. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to form barrier layers in both the bottom part and cover sheet from polychlorotrifluoroethylene. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-11, 14, and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter. The inventions of claims 3 and 14 (as well as claims 4-11 and 15 due to their (in)direct dependency from either claim 3 or 14) is directed to a package comprising the shaped container have one or more pockets and a top cover adhered to the top surface of the container, as set forth in claims 1 and 12, that further comprises a bottom cover adhered to the bottom surface of the container, wherein the bottom cover comprises heat seal layer bonded to a fluoropolymer layer by means of an intermediate adhesive layer. Clerc represents the closest prior art. However, Clerc does not teach or fairly suggest the packaging as recited in claims 3 and 14 further comprising a bottom cover adhered to the bottom surface of the packaging comprising a heat seal layer bonded to a fluoropolymer layer by means of an intermediate adhesive layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAMSEY E ZACHARIA whose telephone number is (571)272-1518. The best time to reach the examiner is weekday afternoons, Eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Callie Shosho, can be reached on 571 272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAMSEY ZACHARIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 21, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600833
COVER FILM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595389
MULTILAYER STRUCTURES AND ARTICLES WITH COATING LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584088
HIGHLY DURABLE PERMEABLE FLUOROPOLYMER CELL CULTURE BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583985
Coated Film
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576620
Modification of Polypropylene Resins with Nucleating Agents to Enhance Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Films
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month