Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/613,398

Method and System for Operating an Electrically Driven Working Device With at Least One Battery Pack, Electrically Driven Working Device, And/or Battery Pack

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Examiner
IMTIAZ, ZOHEB S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
369 granted / 460 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
485
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 460 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5-12 and 14-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ko et al. US publication no.: US 2022/0224138 in view of Vanko et al. US publication no.: US 2018/0248507 A1. Regarding claims 1 and 16, Ko et al. teach, a method for operating an electrically driven working device with at least one battery pack that is to supply the working device with electric drive power (see figures 1-4), the method comprising the steps of: a) detecting a temperature of the battery pack, by way of a temperature sensor (11) of the battery pack (see temperature sensor, paragraphs 61-63), b) determining a resistance variable (RG) of the battery pack on the basis of the detected temperature by way of the battery pack (see paragraphs 83-85, where it is explained that the resistance of the battery is measured based on the temperature), and c) operating the working device on the basis of the determined resistance variable (RG) (see step s70, figure 4 which depicts that the power is transmitted to the load based on the determined resistance value), wherein the working device is a ground-guided and/or hand-guided and/or a gardening, forestry, construction and/or ground working device (see paragraph 125, where the device is an electric tool or power tool), Ko et al. teach the that the driving mechanism is a power tool such as an electric drill as seen in paragraph125 but is silent on teaching further configurations of the power tool. Vanko et al. teach: wherein the working device and the battery pack are detachably electrically connected to one another to supply power to operate the working device (see figure 1, where the battery pack 108 is inherently detachable); wherein one or both of: (i) the working device is selected from a set of different working devices able to be electrically connected to the battery pack in detachable fashion, or (ii) the battery pack is selected from a set of different battery packs able to be electrically connected to the working device in detachable fashion (see figure 1, where the battery pack 108 is inherently detachable), and wherein the method further comprises: detecting a voltage (OCV), by way of the battery pack and/or the working device, and wherein step c) comprises: operating the working device on the basis of the detected voltage (OCV), such that a voltage (V) remains above a cut-off voltage limit (Vcutoff) for a protective cut-off of the battery pack prior to an undervoltage (see paragraph 98, where the undervoltage is detected and power is cut-off to protect the battery pack if it’s below a certain threshold). In view of Vanko et al.’s teachings, it would’ve been obvious to one with the ordinary skills in the art, with the apparatus as taught by Ko et al. to include; wherein the working device and the battery pack are detachably electrically connected to one another to supply power to operate the working device; wherein one or both of: (i) the working device is selected from a set of different working devices able to be electrically connected to the battery pack in detachable fashion, or (ii) the battery pack is selected from a set of different battery packs able to be electrically connected to the working device in detachable fashion, and wherein the method further comprises: detecting a voltage (OCV), by way of the battery pack and/or the working device, and wherein step c) comprises: operating the working device on the basis of the detected voltage (OCV), such that a voltage (V) remains above a cut-off voltage limit (Vcutoff) for a protective cut-off of the battery pack prior to an undervoltage, for the purpose of protecting the circuit. Regarding claim 2, Ko et al. teach, the method according to claim 1, wherein step b) further comprises: determining the resistance variable (RG) on the basis of a state of charge variable (SOCG) and/or a state of health variable (SOHG) of the battery pack (see paragraph 85). Regarding claim 3, Ko et al. teach, the method according to claim 2, wherein the method further comprises: at a time before step b): detecting a voltage (OCV) of the battery pack for the state of charge variable (SOCG) (see paragraph 16), and/or at a time before step b): detecting a charging current (AI) of the battery pack for a charging variable (AG) for the state of health variable (SOHG), by way of the battery pack and/or a charger. Regarding claim 5, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 3, wherein the method further comprises: determining a maximum drive power variable and/or maximum drive current variable (MALIG) on the basis of the resistance variable (RG), of the detected voltage (OCV) and of a cut-off voltage limit variable (Vcutoff) by way of the working device, and wherein step c) comprises: Operating the working device on the basis of the determined maximum drive power variable and/or maximum drive current variable (MALIG), until the maximum drive power variable and/or maximum drive current variable (MALIG) is reached (see paragraph 95-97 and 152 and claim 1, which explains that the maximum power is determined and can be transferred to the motor to drive it at a maximum power). Regarding claim 6, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 1, wherein the working device has an electric drive motor, and where the operating step c) further comprises: operating the electric drive motor so as to increase an electric drive power (AL4) of the electric drive motor, starting from zero and/or so as to reach a setpoint speed (nsoll) and/or a setpoint torque (Msoll) of the electric drive motor (see paragraphs 46-48 where the operations of the motor is shown in which a current is applied to the motor for it to reach a certain torque based on the current applied), wherein the resistance variable (RG) is determined and/or the voltage (OCV) is detected at least when the drive power (AL4) is zero (paragraph 44 discloses plurality of stage of the motor including a “start” wherein the voltage/current would be at a starting level). Regarding claim 7, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises the steps of: at a time after step b) and/or at a time before step c), communicating the determined resistance variable (RG) from the battery pack to the working device, and wherein step c) further comprises: operating the working device on the basis of the communicated resistance variable (RG) (see communication unit 30, figure 1 and paragraphs 67-69). Regarding claim 8, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 5, wherein the voltage (OCV) is detected and/or the maximum drive power variable (see step s60, figure 4) and/or maximum drive current variable (MALIG) are/is determined again, at least at a time before each operating. Regarding claim 9, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 6, wherein step a) and/or step b) are/is carried out, and in particular the voltage (OCV) is detected and/or the maximum drive power variable and/or maximum drive current variable (MALIG) are/is determined and/or the resistance variable (RG) is communicated, in particular again, at least at a time before each Operating, in particular each increase in the drive power (AL4) starting from zero (see figure 4 and paragraph 44). Regarding claim 10, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 5, wherein the method further comprises: when the detected temperature (T) is below a lower temperature limit (Tlimit) and/or the determined resistance variable (RG) is above a resistance variable limit (RGlimit) and/or the determined maximum drive power variable and/or maximum drive current variable (MALIG) is below a maximum drive power variable limit and/or maximum drive current variable limit (MALIGlimit), outputting user-perceptible information (Info) in relation thereto by way of the working device (see figure 4 – steps s60-s80, in which it is explained that the control system doesn’t allow the discharging of the power to not exceed the maximum power value). Regarding claim 11, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 6, wherein the working device has a user-actuatable operating element, for the setpoint speed (nsoll), and wherein step c) takes place in a manner triggered by an actuation, in particular adjustment, of the operating element (see paragraph 125, “electric drill” or “electric bicycle”). Regarding claim 12, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 1, wherein step b) comprises: determining the resistance variable (RG) by way of a model (MO) of the battery pack (see figure 2 and paragraphs 85-90). Regarding claim 14, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 1, wherein wherein the working device is ground-guided and/or hand-guided/or a gardening, forestry, construction and/or ground working device (see paragraph 125, “electric drill” or “electric bicycle”). Regarding claim 15, Ko et al. teach, The method according to claim 14, wherein the working device is a saw, or a pruner, or a hedge trimmer, or a hedge cutter, or a woodcutter, or pruning shears, or an angle grinder, or a blower, or a leaf blower, or a vacuum cleaner, or a leaf vacuum, or a cleaning device, or a high-pressure cleaner, or a sweeper, or a sweeper roller, or a sweeping brush, or a lawnmower, or a grass trimmer, or a brush cutter, or a scarifier (see paragraph 125). Regarding claim 17, Ko et al. teach, the system according to claim 16, wherein the system further comprises: the working device comprising the operating unit, and/or the battery pack (see figure 1). Regarding claim 18, Ko et al. teach, An electrically driven working device and/or battery pack for use in a system according to claim 16 (see figures 1-4 and paragraphs 45-46). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZOHEB S IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4308. The examiner can normally be reached 11am-730pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZOHEB S IMTIAZ/Primary Examiner , Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603594
VOICE COIL MOTOR, METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING VOICE COIL MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603595
ELECTROMAGNETIC MOTOR SYSTEM, POSTION CONTROL SYSTEM, STAGE APPARATUS, LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUS, METHOD OF DETERMINING A MOTOR-DEPENDENT COMMUTATION MODEL FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603596
Power supply circuit in an inverter for driving an electrical machine, method of operating the power supply circuit and safety control device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592612
SYSTEM FOR DAMPING UNWANTED MOTOR MOVEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580456
ROTOR POWER TRANSFER CIRCUIT FOR ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 460 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month