Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/613,625

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TESTING A JOINT COMMUNICATION AND SENSING CAPABLE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Examiner
BARKER, MATTHEW M
Art Unit
3646
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
577 granted / 794 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
814
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§103
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
39.3%
-0.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 794 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/27/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 7/27/2026, with respect to the prior art have been fully considered and are persuasive. However, a new ground(s) of rejection is made under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as the amended language lacks antecedent basis and clarity as to what is necessitated. In addressing the identified issues, it is suggested that the claims be amended to include the framework in which the JCAS device receives, selects, and/or detects the transmitted RF signal and subsequently provides results to the processor of the invention for the required analyses. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "analyze the selection of the correct RF signal by the JCAS capable device for performing its measurements" in lines 9-10. Claim 13 at lines 9-10 requires a corresponding method step of “analyzing…” There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. No “selection” is previously established, nor is there basis for “the correct RF signal”. Additionally, while it appears “its measurements” may refer to the detection of a micro-doppler shift by the JCAS device, it is likewise unclear if this is the measurement being referenced or if others are required. Clarification is required. Claims 2-4 and 6-12 depend on claim 1 and are likewise indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter As best the intent is understood, claims 1-4 and 6-13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended as suggested to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Griesing et al. disclose a wireless channel emulator for testing wireless devices in a test chamber. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Matthew M Barker whose telephone number is (571)272-3103. The examiner can normally be reached on a part time schedule, typically M-Fri 8:00 AM-4:30 PM Eastern Time, but having off alternating Monday-Tuesdays and Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Keith can be reached at 571-273-6878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW M BARKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768945
Dummy Apparatus with Movable Radar Reflecting Elements for Testing Driver Assistance Systems
5y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768947
SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR RADAR DETECTION
4y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12768982
MEASURING APPARATUS FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12761005
Camera Container For Military Aircraft
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12736388
RADAR-OPERATED FILL LEVEL MEASURING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.0%)
3y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month