Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/613,682

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING READOUT OF A PIXEL ARRAY ASSOCIATED WITH AN IMAGE SENSOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 24, 2023 — IN 202341021143
Examiner
FOSSELMAN, JOEL W
Art Unit
2639
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
706 granted / 900 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
915
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
88.9%
+48.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 900 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 8-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species 2, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/23/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Augusto et al. (US-20060261996-A1, hereinafter Augusto). Re claim 1, Augusto discloses, a method for performing readout of a pixel array associated with an image sensor, the method comprising: for a first exposure row and one or more additional exposure rows of the pixel array (pars [0480]-[0482], each row of the pixel matrix comprises a first exposure row and at least one additional exposure row), detecting, using processing circuitry, completion of exposure operations of the first exposure row and the one or more additional exposure rows (pars [0474]-[04079]); and reading, using the processing circuitry, pixel values from sets of columns associated with sets of analog to digital converters (ADCs) corresponding to the first exposure row and the one or more additional exposure rows (fig 5, 139, pars [0369] and [0480]-[0496]). Claim 14 is rejected for the reasons stated in claim 1. The system as claimed would have been anticipated by the method of Augusto. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 and 15-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Re claim 2, Augusto fails to explicitly or implicitly disclose the limitations as follows: “… the second ramp gains being different from the first ramp gain; and the reading the pixel values further includes, reading, from the first set of ADCs within a first time period, pixel values from a first set of columns associated with the first set of ADCs from among a plurality of columns in the first exposure row of the pixel array, and reading, from the one or more additional sets of ADCs within the first time period, pixel values from a second set of columns associated with the one or more additional sets of ADCs from among the plurality of columns in the one or more additional exposure rows of the pixel array, wherein the first set of columns are different from the second set of columns” along with all other limitations of claim 2. Claim 15 recites a similarly allowed limitation. Dependent claims 3-7 and 16-20 are objected to for the same reasons. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOEL W FOSSELMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3728. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 - 5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at (571)272-7406. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOEL W FOSSELMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 18, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 18, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641333
SCREENSHOT PROCESSING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632914
MEDICAL IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD OF THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626342
Fisheye Lens Structure, Housing, Image Capture, and Image Processing
2y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627884
METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT A SETTING OPERATION OF A CONTAINER INSPECTION APPARATUS AND CONTAINER INSPECTION APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12615453
SOLID-STATE IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD
1y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 900 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month