Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/613,776

MANIFOLDS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING CELL FUNCTIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Priority
Mar 24, 2023 — provisional 63/492,083
Examiner
LYLE, SOPHIA YUAN
Art Unit
1796
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
3D Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
92 granted / 160 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+56.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
210
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 160 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-20 remain pending in the application. Drawings Color photographs and color drawings are not accepted in utility applications unless a petition filed under 37 CFR 1.84(a)(2) is granted. Any such petition must be accompanied by the appropriate fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(h), one set of color drawings or color photographs, as appropriate, if submitted via the USPTO patent electronic filing system or three sets of color drawings or color photographs, as appropriate, if not submitted via the via USPTO patent electronic filing system, and, unless already present, an amendment to include the following language as the first paragraph of the brief description of the drawings section of the specification: The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee. Color photographs will be accepted if the conditions for accepting color drawings and black and white photographs have been satisfied. See 37 CFR 1.84(b)(2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “the fluidic connection” on lines 9-10 where there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation, as no fluidic connection has been recited prior. Is it referring to the connection between the second reservoir and the fluidic channel? Or based on claim 19 lines 9-10 was it meant for it to be “the fluidic channel”? Claims 2-18 are rejected by virtue of being dependent on a rejected claim. Please note that claim 5 recites “the fluidic connection” where this would need to be changed depending on claim 1. Claim 5 recites “the inlet reservoir, the outlet reservoir” where there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation, as no inlet reservoir or outlet reservoir have been previously recited. Claim 10 recites “the outlet-side fluid with respect to the inlet-side fluid.” where there is insufficient antecedent basis for “the outlet-side fluid” and “the inlet-side fluid” as neither have been recited prior. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 19-20 are allowed. Claims 1-18 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1 and 20, the closest prior art of record is Thorslund (US-2011/0217771-A1). Thorslund teaches where a fluidic culture device is generated by using soft lithography using PDMS (Throslund; [0129]). The fluidic culture device 100 seen in Figure 3 includes a substrate 101 that includes an open culture chamber 110 (Throslund; [0045], [0046]). It is described by [0047] that fluid channels 120 and 130 have respective inlets 140 and 150, and that instead of the common outlet 160 seen in Figure 3 that each channel 120 and 130 may have a dedicated outlet 160. [0079] describes where respective fluid reservoirs 240 and 250 are attached to inlets 140 and 150, [0080] describes where there may also be an outlet reservoir connected to outlet 160. It is evidenced by Orrick (WO-2008/100559-A2) that PDMS is a semi-permeable material (Orrick; page 53 lines 19-21). However, Thorslund does not teach or even suggest a plug positioned between the second reservoir and the fluidic channel, taking the second reservoir to be the reservoir connected to the outlet 160 and the channel to be fluid channel 120 as best seen in Figure 4. It would not have been obvious to one skilled in the art to modify Thorslund to include a plug. Additionally, even if the culture chamber 110 which is described to hold a gel/matrix in [0012] of Thorslund is mapped to the plug, the location of the culture chamber 110 is not “between” the reservoir connected to the outlet 160 and the fluid channel 120. Rather, the culture chamber 110 is seen in Figure 4 to be along the fluid channel 120. Schaffer (US-2023/0132012-A1) does teach a typical two-chamber, airway barrier bioreactor 300 with gravity perfusion, however Schaffer does not describe the material used to form the bioreactor chambers and does not teach or suggest the usage of a plug (Schaffer; [0127], Figures 3A-B). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SOPHIA LYLE whose telephone number is (571)272-9856. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00 M-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Curtis Mayes can be reached at (571)272-1234. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.Y.L./Examiner, Art Unit 1796 /MELVIN C. MAYES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766504
TESTING CHIP AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753379
AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS SYSTEM
6y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746546
MICRO-FLUIDIC CHIP AND REACTION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746543
Microfluidic Detection Strip Chip and Preparation and Method Thereof
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742773
COLORIMETRIC BIO SENSOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+56.9%)
3y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 160 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month