DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 3-9 and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
For Claims 4-8 and 14-17, the claims recite “second control information” but there is no corresponding “first control information”.
Remaining claims are rejected as depending from a rejected claim.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1-7, 10-16, and 19-20, as understood in light of any rejections under 35 USC 112, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu et al. (US 2020/0059282).
For Claims 1 and 19, Wu teaches a method for reporting information, performed by a terminal, and a terminal, comprising: a processor; and a transceiver, connected with the processor (see paragraph 11); the method comprising:
sending first channel state information to a network device (see paragraphs 98, 123); and
sending first indication information to the network device, wherein the first indication information comprises a difference between the first channel state information and second channel state information (see paragraphs 98, 102, 123).
For Claims 11 and 20, Wu teaches a method for reporting information, performed by a network device, and a network device, comprising: a processor; and a transceiver, connected with the processor (see paragraph 12); the method comprising:
receiving first channel state information sent by a terminal (see paragraphs 98, 123); and
receiving first indication information sent by the terminal, wherein the first indication information comprises a difference between the first channel state information and second channel state information (see paragraphs 98, 102, 123).
For Claims 2 and 12, Wu teaches the method, wherein the first channel state information is reported at a first reporting time and the first indication information is reported at a second reporting time (see paragraph 123, Figure 11), the first channel state information is sent based on a first cycle (see paragraphs 123, 125); the first indication information is sent based on a second cycle (see paragraph 123); or the first channel state information is sent based on a first cycle and the first indication information is sent based on a second cycle (see paragraph 123).
For Claims 3 and 13, Wu teaches the method, wherein each of the first channel state information and the second channel state information comprises at least one of: a channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) resource indicator (CRI); a rank indicator (RI) (see paragraph 134); a precoding matrix indicator (PMI) (see paragraph 90); a channel quality indicator (CQI) (see paragraph 90); a layer indicator (LI); a synchronization signal/physical broadcast signal block resource indicator (SSBRI); a layer-1 reference signal received power (L1-RSRP) (see paragraph 132); a layer-1 signal to interference plus noise ratio (L1-SINR) (see paragraph 132); a Doppler migration; a Doppler spread; an average delay; or a delay spread.
For Claims 4 and 14, Wu teaches the method, further comprising:
receiving second control information sent by the network device, wherein the second control information indicates that the first indication information is sent non-periodically (see Figure 11, paragraphs 118, 123, 125: the control information may be sent in one transmission to save overhead);
wherein the first indication information is sent to the network device based on the second control information within a time period after the first channel state information is sent (see paragraph 123, stage 1); or
wherein the first indication information is downlink control information (DCI) (see paragraph 118).
For Claim 5, Wu teaches the method, wherein the first channel state information is sent periodically (119, 125, 127), and the method further comprises:
determining an i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and an (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information based on the second control information, where i is a positive integer (see paragraphs 123, 125);
wherein the first indication information is sent to the network device within a time period between a time point of sending the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and a time point of sending the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information (see Figure 11, time between 1104 and 1106).
For Clam 6, Wu teaches the method, wherein determining the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information based on the second control information comprises one of:
determining the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information based on second indication information, wherein the second control information comprises the second indication information (see paragraphs 123, 125); or
determining two pieces of first channel state information recently after a T time period starting from receiving the second control information as the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information.
For Claim 7, Wu teaches the method, wherein the second control information comprises a third cycle; and based on the second control information, the first indication information is sent to the network device based on the third cycle within the time period after the first channel state information is sent (see Figure 11: different CSI stages).
For Claims 10 and 18, Wu teaches the method, wherein: the first indication information is carried on one of a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH), or a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) (see paragraphs 76, 97: report on PUCCH); or
feedback information of the second channel state information is generated based on any one of: a broadband; a narrow band; multiple ports; each port in the multiple ports; multiple beams (see paragraph 92); or each beam in the multiple beams (see paragraph 92).
For Claim 15, Wu teaches the method, wherein the first channel state information is sent periodically (see paragraphs 119, 125, 127), and the terminal determines an i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and an (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information based on the second control information, where i is a positive integer (see paragraphs 123-124); and sends the first indication information to the network device within a time period between a time point of sending the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and a time point of sending the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information (see Figure 11: between 1104 and 1106),
wherein the second control information comprises second indication information, the second indication information indicates the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information (see paragraphs 123, 125); or
two pieces of first channel state information after the second control information are determined as the i.sup.th piece of first channel state information and the (i+1).sup.th piece of first channel state information (see paragraphs 123, 125).
For Claim 16, Wu teaches the method, wherein the second control information comprises a third cycle; the second control information instructs the terminal to send the first indication information to the network device based on the third cycle within the time period after the first channel state information is sent (see Figure 11: different CSI stages); or
the second control information comprises a third cycle and an index identifier; and the second control information instructs the terminal to determine the third cycle corresponding to the index identifier based on the index identifier; and to send the first indication information to the network device based on the third cycle.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claim(s) s 8-9 and 17, as understood in light of any rejections under 35 USC 112, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu et al. (US 0059282) as applied to claims 1, 4, 11-12, 154, and 16 above, and further in view of Manolakos et al. (US 2021/0091835).
For Claim 8, Wu further teaches the method, wherein the second control information comprises a fourth cycle (see paragraphs 127-128: time indication); and the method further comprises:
determining the fourth cycle corresponding to the configuration comprised in the second control information (see paragraphs 123, 125, 127-128: multiple periods of sending feedback and differential feedback as configured);
wherein the first indication information is sent to the network device based on the fourth cycle within the time period after the first channel state information is sent (see paragraphs 123, 125, 127-128: multiple periods of sending feedback and differential feedback as configured).
Though Wu does teach a configuration of the UE to send multiple cycles of CSI and thus at least implicitly teaches an index identifier, Wu as applied above is not explicit as to, but Manolakos teaches an index identifier (see paragraphs 65-66, Figure 8: time index identifier).
Thus it would have been obvious that one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to employ an index as in Manolakos when configuring the UE as in Wu. One of ordinary skill would have been able to do so with the reasonably predictable result of ensuring the UE is configured to provide the CSI in a timely manner.
For Claims 9 and 17, Wu as modified by Manolakos above further teaches the method, further comprising: receiving a radio resource control (RRC) signaling sent by the network device, wherein the RRC signaling comprises a corresponding relationship between the index identifier and the fourth cycle (see paragraph 118: RRC; paragraphs 127-128: time indicated for differential and non-differential feedback).
Conclusion
The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim et al. (US 2007/0242770) teaches a system for configuring a UE to provide differential feedback. Wang et al. (US 2024/0292255) teaches a differential CSI feedback system using RRC signaling.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CASSANDRA L DECKER whose telephone number is (571)270-3946. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 am - 4:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/CASSANDRA L DECKER/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 2/23/2026
/FARUK HAMZA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2466