Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/613,977

ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTENT EDITING METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 22, 2024
Examiner
HUNTER, MISHAWN N
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
samsung electronics Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
766 granted / 982 resolved
+20.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1004
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 982 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 17 recite “display[ing] two or more frames of media content in a first area of the display while displaying a preview frame of the two or more frames.” It is unclear whether the first area of the display and the preview frame are the same area or if the first area displays the preview frame of the two or more frames or something entirely different. Please amend and/or clarify the claims to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 17 further recite “display[ing] at least one user interface corresponding to the at least one section determined based on a user input on the at least one object.” A user input “on” an object is unclear and there appears to be an omission amounting to a gap between the elements Please amend and/or clarify the claims to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 and 17 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Mishawn N Hunter whose telephone number is (571)272-7635. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Tran can be reached at 571-272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MISHAWN N. HUNTER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 03, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 01, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 17, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597446
AUTOMATIC BESPOKE EDITS OF VIDEO CONTENT USING AI
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597447
AN ONLINE COURSE DELIVERY FEEDBACK CONTENT EDITING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596243
LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPE WITH ELECTRICAL HIGH-ORDER MODULATION EXTRACTION MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594888
HITCH ANGLE DETECTION SYSTEM, HITCH ANGLE DETECTION DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592262
METHOD, APPARATUS, READABLE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR VIDEO PREVIEW
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 982 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month