Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/614,751

ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Mar 25, 2024
Priority
Jun 20, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0078738
Examiner
ALEJANDRO, RAYMOND
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
SK Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
926 granted / 1170 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
68.0%
+28.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1170 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 03/25/24, 11/01/24, and 11/26/25 was considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were received on 03/25/24. Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” “of the present disclosure”, etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because it does not appear to capture the essence of the disclosed/claimed invention. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. It does not appear to capture the essence of the disclosed/claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Kurita 2013/0149583. As to claims 1-3, 9-13: Kurita discloses that it is known in the art to make a battery system (i.e., an energy storage apparatus) comprising an accommodation casing/housing 3 including a cover and a plurality of layered accommodating spaces/portions including apertures/holes/gaps communicating with the outside, a plurality of electrical cells 2 in thermal contact therewith, and a cooling fan 4; an internal passage/pathway or channel through which a fluid A1/A2 passes (Abstract; 0003; 0009-0010; 0029-0030; 0040-0048; 0051-0055; 0066-0072; 0142-0154; see CLAIMS 1-5; see Figures 2a-b, 3a-b, 6d, 7a, 9, 10b & 11a). Figures 2a-b, 3a-b, 6d, 7a, 9, 10b & 11a, infra, depict the structure of the battery system: PNG media_image1.png 406 518 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 364 392 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 434 536 media_image3.png Greyscale PNG media_image4.png 298 500 media_image4.png Greyscale PNG media_image5.png 322 506 media_image5.png Greyscale PNG media_image6.png 412 512 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 474 542 media_image7.png Greyscale PNG media_image8.png 308 464 media_image8.png Greyscale PNG media_image9.png 442 502 media_image9.png Greyscale As to claims 4-6: Figures 9, 10b and 11a of Kurita illustrate battery cells including a surface including a terminal/tab protruding 14, 32 therefrom and from a different surface in thermal contact with the battery cell (0040-0048; 0051-0055; 0066-0072; 0142-0154; see Figures 9, 10b & 11a). As to claims 7-8: Figures 2-3, 7a, 9 and 11a of Kurita also illustrate resin-based layered portions 14, 32 on an inner wall (0058; see Figures 2-3, 7a, 9 & 11a). As to claims 14-16: Figures 2a-b, 3a-b, 6d, 7a, 9, 10b & 11a of Kurita depict a heat-conductive partition wall (i.e., wall 9a can be taken to represent applicant’s broadly claimed partition wall) positioned between the accommodating spaces/portions and in direct contact with battery cells (see Figures 2a-b, 3a-b, 6d, 7a, 9, 10b & 11a). Kurita disclose the accommodating body/space made of a metallic/steel based material (0058; 0139). Note that the present claims fail to define the specific heat conductive degree, as such, it can be fairly asserted that the partition wall of Kurita satisfies the requirement of conducting heat to certain degree as broadly claimed. Thus, the present claims are anticipated. (at least) Claims 1 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Oshiba et al 9859533. As to claims 1 and 16: Oshiba et al discloses that it is known in the art to make a battery system (i.e., an energy storage apparatus) comprising an accommodation casing/housing including a cover and a plurality of layered accommodating spaces/portions including apertures/holes/gaps communicating with the outside, a plurality of electrical cells in thermal contact therewith, an internal passage/pathway or channel through which a fluid passes (Abstract; COL 6, line 32 to COL 7, line 40; COL 10, line 15 to COL 11, line 30; see 1st/2nd Modified Embodiments; see Figures 3 & 6-7, 11 & 14). ). Oshiba et al disclose the accommodating body/space can be made of a metallic/steel based material (COL 8, lines 37-46). PNG media_image10.png 844 410 media_image10.png Greyscale PNG media_image11.png 794 458 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 770 464 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 654 460 media_image13.png Greyscale PNG media_image14.png 1 1 media_image14.png Greyscale PNG media_image14.png 1 1 media_image14.png Greyscale PNG media_image15.png 468 740 media_image15.png Greyscale Thus, the present claim is anticipated. (at least) Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Fujii 2008/0026284. As to claims 1-3: Fujii discloses that it is known in the art to make a battery system (i.e., an energy storage apparatus) comprising an accommodation casing/housing including a cover and a plurality of layered accommodating spaces/portions including apertures/holes/gaps communicating with the outside, a plurality of electrical cells in thermal contact therewith, and a cooling fan 8; an internal passage/pathway or channel through which a fluid passes (Abstract; 0037-0041; 0049-0057; see CLAIMS 1-4; see Figures 1 & 3-8). PNG media_image16.png 856 566 media_image16.png Greyscale PNG media_image17.png 860 560 media_image17.png Greyscale PNG media_image18.png 854 562 media_image18.png Greyscale PNG media_image19.png 846 552 media_image19.png Greyscale PNG media_image20.png 762 602 media_image20.png Greyscale Thus, the present claims are anticipated. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND ALEJANDRO whose telephone number is (571)272-1282. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday (8:00 am-6:30 pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas A. Smith can be reached at (571) 272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAYMOND ALEJANDRO/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683153
METHOD OF FABRICATING NANOPOROUS ZN ANODES AND THE APPLICATIONS IN ZN BATTERIES
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680011
COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THERMALLY CONDUCTIVE FILLERS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683237
BATTERY PACK AND DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671155
RESIN FILM FOR TERMINAL, AND POWER STORAGE DEVICE USING THE SAME
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671113
Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution for Lithium Secondary Battery and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.1%)
3y 4m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1170 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month