Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/615,261

APPLICATION ICON DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 25, 2024
Priority
Sep 26, 2021 — CN 202111131409.3 +1 more
Examiner
MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA
Art Unit
2174
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allowance Rate
77 granted / 258 resolved
-25.2% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
292
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
69.0%
+29.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 258 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION This communication is responsive to RCE/Amendment filed 06/30/2026. Claims 1, 4-6, 9-11 and 14-17 are pending in this application. In the Amendment, claims 1, 6 and 11 are amended and claims 2-3, 7-8 and 12-13 are cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/30/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that neither Lee nor WonLee discloses changing the folder attribute based on the position of the target folder. The Examiner respectfully disagrees as WonLee groups icons according to attributes and are located in folder pages containing the same attributes where changing the display of the page which is changing the position of the target folder also results in the display of the displayed attributes being changed accordingly (WonLee, para.100-104; Fig.5A-C, changing of positions/pages D2 is moving the target folder which is the folder the user targets to view and removes from the display view icons that do not belong in the classified page group). Therefore Lee and WonLee still read into the claims as they are currently written. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 4-6, 9-11 and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1, 6 and 11 recite the limitation "the first attribute" in line 3, 5 and 5 respectively. Claims 1, 6 and 11 recite the limitation "the first area" in line 9, 11 and 11 respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claims. Claims 4-5, 7, 9-10, 12 and 14-17 are rejected for fully incorporating the deficiencies of their respective base claims. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4, 6, 9, 11, 14 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (“Lee”, US 2017/0277400) in view of Lee (“WonLee”, US 2014/0324873). As per claim 1, Lee teaches an application icon display method, comprising: displaying a target folder, the target folder has a first attribute (Lee, para.147, attribute information); receiving a first input by a user (Lee, Fig.2B, Folder Edition; para.144-146, edition request; Fig.3A, para.157, folder generation); and in response to the first input, displaying the target folder in the first position (Lee, Fig.2B, target folder 3, para.151; Fig.3A, folder 6a, para.160), canceling the display of a first icon displayed in the first area (Lee, Fig.2B, applications 1 and 2; para.151, 159, icons deleted from home screen), and displaying the first icon in the target folder (Lee, Fig.2B, 3A, icons 1 and 2 displayed in target folder 3; para.146, 151, 160); wherein the first area is determined by the first position (Lee, Fig.2B, 3A, target folder displayed in place of icons, para.151, 160) and the first icon comprises an icon corresponding to the first attribute among icons displayed in the first area (Lee, para.148, 155, icons in home screen page with similar attribute included in target folder). receiving a second input for the target folder (Lee, Fig.5B, control screen 20 displayed; para.182-184); and in response to the second input, changing the attribute of the target folder to a second attribute (Lee, Fig.5B, para.182-184, unfolding of already-generated folder), canceling the display of a second icon displayed in the first area, and updating the first icon displayed in the target folder to the second icon (Lee, Fig.5B; para.184, changed state reflected on home screen); wherein the second icon comprises an icon corresponding to the second attribute among icons displayed in the first area (Lee, Fig.5B; para.184, changed state reflected on home screen). However Lee does not teach displaying the target folder in a second position, wherein the target folder comprises a third icon; the third icon comprises an icon corresponding to the first attribute among icons displayed in a second area, and the second area is determined by the second position; and wherein the first input is moving the target folder, the position of the target folder is changed from the second position to the first position, canceling display of the third icon in the target folder not belonging to the first area in the target folder. WonLee teaches a method of moving icons to target folders that comprises: display the target folder in a second position, wherein the target folder comprises a third icon (WonLee, para.100-133; Fig.5A-C, folders in different screen positions/pages D2 with app icons; Fig.6, folders F1-F4 divided into areas include app icons classified according to group; Fig.7-8, areas F1-F4); the third icon comprises an icon corresponding to the first attribute among icons displayed in a second area (WonLee, para.100-133; Fig.5A-C, 6-8, folders F1-F4 divided into areas include app icons classified according to group), and the second area is determined by the second position (WonLee, para.100-133; Fig.5A-C, area/position according to page D2; Fig.6-8, folders F1-F4 divided into areas/positions); and wherein the first input is moving the target folder, the position of the target folder is changed from the second position to the first position, canceling display of the third icon in the target folder not belonging to the first area in the target folder (WonLee, para.100-104; Fig.5A-C, changing of positions/pages D2 is moving the target folder which is the folder the user targets to view and removes from the display view icons that do not belong in the classified page group). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include WonLee‘s teaching with Lee’s method in order to rearrange icons within folders automatically. As per claim 4, the method of Lee and WonLee teaches the method according to claim 1, wherein before displaying the target folder in the first position, the method further comprises: obtaining a first size parameter of the target folder (Lee, Fig.2B, para.151; Fig.3A, para.160, target folder displayed in icon size); and after receiving the first input by the user and before displaying the target folder in the first position, the method further comprises: obtaining an end position of an input track of the first input (Lee, Fig.2B, para.144-145; Fig.3A, para.157, input on icon is end position), and determining the first position according to the end position, wherein the first position is a position close to the end position and satisfying the first size parameter (Lee, Fig.2B, 3A, target folder displayed in position of selected icon, para.151, 160). Claims 6 and 11 are similar in scope to claim 1, and are therefore rejected under similar rationale. Claims 9 and 14 are similar in scope to claim 4, and are therefore rejected under similar rationale. As per claim 16, the method of Lee and WonLee teaches a chip, comprising a processor and a communication interface, wherein the communication interface is coupled to the processor, and the processor is configured to run a program or an instruction, so that steps of the application icon display method according to claim 1 are implemented (Lee, para.46-48, 54, 217, Fig.1A, interface 110, processor 180). As per claim 17, the method of Lee and WonLee teaches a computer program product, wherein the computer program product is stored in a storage medium, and the computer program product is executed by at least one processor to implement the steps of the application icon display method according to claim 1 (Lee, para.46, 53-54, 217, Fig.1A, memory 170, processor 180). Claims 5, 10 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (“Lee”, US 2017/0277400) and Lee (“WonLee”, US 2014/0324873) in view of Xu et al. (“Xu”, US 2016/0313893). As per claim 5, the method of Lee and WonLee teaches the method according to claim 1, before displaying the first icon in the target folder, the method further comprises: obtaining a second size parameter of the target folder (Lee, Fig.2B, para.151; Fig.3A, para.160, target folder displayed in icon size). However, the method of Lee and WonLee does not teach wherein the first icon comprises multiple sub-icons, and displaying the first icon in the target folder comprises: displaying N sub-icons in a first size in the target folder, and displaying sub-icons among the multiple sub-icons other than the N sub-icons in a second size; wherein N is determined by the second size parameter, in a case that the sub-icon of the first size receives an input, a user interface of an application program corresponding to the sub-icon of the first size is displayed; and in a case that the sub-icon of the second size receives an input, an expansion interface of the target folder is displayed. Xu teaches a method of displaying icons within folders wherein an icon comprises multiple sub-icons (Xu, Fig.3, para.197, Folder 1 icon includes sub-icons/thumbnails A-H), and displaying the first icon in the target folder comprises: displaying N sub-icons in a first size in the target folder (Xu, Fig.3, para.197, Folder 1 icon includes sub-icons/thumbnails A-H), and displaying sub-icons among the multiple sub-icons other than the N sub-icons in a second size (Xu, Fig.3, para.197, thumbnails A-H smaller size); wherein N is determined by the second size parameter, in a case that the sub-icon of the first size receives an input (Xu, Fig.3, para.197, application E larger size), a user interface of an application program corresponding to the sub-icon of the first size is displayed (Xu, Fig.4A, para.198, application open when app E selected); and in a case that the sub-icon of the second size receives an input, an expansion interface of the target folder is displayed (Xu, Fig.4B, para.198, expansion of folder when thumbnails selected). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include Xu‘s teaching with the method of Lee and WonLee in order to facilitate viewing of all applications. Claims 10 and 15 are similar in scope to claim 5, and are therefore rejected under similar rationale. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Son et al. (US 2014/0320516) teaches a method of arranging icons based on color attribute. WON et al. (US 2014/0181751) teaches a method of creating folders based on apps of similar categories. Park et al. (US 2013/0097560) teaches a method of automatically moving icons based on usage. Jeong et al. (US 2014/0101583) teaches a method of arranging icons in different areas based on category. Kasterstein et al. (US 2013/0166527) teaches a method of dynamically creating folder grouping icons with similar parameters. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAJEDA MUHEBBULLAH whose telephone number is (571)272-4065. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Tue/Thur-Fri 10am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William L Bashore can be reached at 571-272-4088. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.M./ Sajeda MuhebbullahExaminer, Art Unit 2174 /WILLIAM L BASHORE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2174
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 25, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12510876
MACHINE STATE VISUALIZATION
3y 9m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12271745
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECONCILING USER INTERACTIONS
6y 10m to grant Granted Apr 08, 2025
Patent 12260841
MULTIPLE PRIMARY USER INTERFACES
3y 9m to grant Granted Mar 25, 2025
Patent 12248673
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ATTRIBUTING A SCROLL EVENT IN AN INFINITE SCROLL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE
5y 0m to grant Granted Mar 11, 2025
Patent 12001661
Bound Based Contextual Zoom
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 04, 2024
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+34.9%)
4y 9m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 258 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month