Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/615,795

BINDER, AND ANODE AND LITHIUM BATTERY EACH INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 25, 2024
Priority
Mar 26, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0039410 +1 more
Examiner
KAUCHER, MARK S
Art Unit
1764
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
723 granted / 1001 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1024
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1001 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/30/26 has been entered. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In paragraph 59, the following monomers are listed, which have the same errors as in the 112 rejections below: “3-(meth)acryloyloxy propyl acid” and “4-(meth)acryloyloxy butyl acid”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 12 recites the two monomers “3-(meth)acryloyloxy propyl acid” and “4-(meth)acryloyloxy butyl acid”, which is confusing and can be interpreted several ways. First, the “-yl acid” isn’t valid nomenclature because “propyl” and “butyl” are substituent groups names and can’t take the acid suffix. Therefore, there is some type of error in the word, which leads to several interpretations. 1) The monomers may have been intended to be -oic acid; namely “3-(meth)acryloyloxy propanoic acid” and “4-(meth)acryloyloxy butanoic acid”. This would be a monomer with a pendant carboxylic acid group. 2) The monomers may have been a truncation of “acid phosphate”; namely “3-(meth)acryloyloxy propyl acid phosphate” and “4-(meth)acryloyloxy butyl acid phosphate”. This would be a monomer with a pendant phosphoric acid group. Similarly, any other acid could be missing, such as “succinate”, “phthalate”, etc. 3) Lastly, the acid could have been intended to be “acrylate”; namely “3-(meth)acryloyloxy propyl acrylate” and “4-(meth)acryloyloxy butyl acrylate”. Since -yl acid is not valid nomenclature introduced by some type of error, it is impossible to determine what the intended monomer was and therefore, the claim is indefinite. In amending the instant claim, care should be taken to not introduce new matter. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK S KAUCHER whose telephone number is (571)270-7340. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-6 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arrie Lanee Reuther can be reached at (571) 270-7026. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARK S KAUCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1764
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Sep 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 19, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 30, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698389
POLY(LACTIC ACID-B-3-HYDROXYPROPIONIC ACID) BLOCK COPOLYMER HAVING EXCELLENT TENSILE STRENGTH AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698352
HYDROPHOBIC POLYMER COMPOSITIONS AND A METHOD TO PREPARE HYDROPHOBIC POLYMER COMPOSITIONS
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692383
RESIN COMPOSITION AND MOLDED PRODUCT
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692336
RUBBER COMPOSITION AND PNEUMATIC TIRE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692422
ELASTIC ANTI-CORROSION ADHESIVE, ELASTIC ANTI-CORROSION ADHESIVE TAPE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 9m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1001 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month