Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/616,232

ELECTRIC MACHINE STATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
SUBRAMANIAN, VISWANATHAN
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Gkn Automotive Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
159 granted / 198 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
238
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 198 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 3.26.24. In view of this communication, claims 11-20 are now pending in this application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Electric machine stator with cooling manifolds having circumferentially variable flow cross section. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 11-18,20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jelinewski et al(US20220393526A1), hereinafter Jelinewski in view of Huber et al (US20220045575A1), hereinafter Huber. Regarding Claim 11, Jelinewski discloses (Figs 1,2,3,4) Electric machine stator (2) comprising: a stator core (3), a stator winding (10-10) attached to the stator core, a plurality of cooling channels (8) extending through the stator core, and two manifolds (4,5) attached to opposed axial ends (Fig 2) of the stator core for conveying a fluid (Fig 3) into the cooling channels, each of the two manifolds having a distribution channel (7) hydraulically connected to a share of the cooling channels (6-11 on both ends which are connected to 8 in a alternating manner Para 0044). Jelinewski does not explicitly disclose wherein a flow cross-section of the distribution channel decreases along a circumferential main extension direction of the distribution channel. Huber discloses (Fig 3) wherein a flow cross-section (Q1(U)) of the distribution channel (18) decreases along a circumferential main extension direction of the distribution channel [Para 0051]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed stator of Jelinewski modified by distribution channel of Huber in order to uniformly distribute cooling fluid to the cooling ducts. PNG media_image1.png 750 462 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 736 360 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 12, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 11. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses wherein the distribution channel is circular (Jelinewski,7) but does not explicitly disclose wherein the flow cross-section of the distribution channel decreases from a position of maximum flow cross-section in both circumferential directions, wherein the fluid is fed to the distribution channel at the position of maximum flow cross-section. Huber further discloses wherein the flow cross-section (Q1(U)) of the distribution channel (18) decreases from a position of maximum flow cross-section (near 12) in both circumferential directions (Fig 3, S)[0051], wherein the fluid is fed to the distribution channel at the position (12) of maximum flow cross-section. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed stator of Jelinewski modified by distribution channel of Huber in order to uniformly distribute cooling fluid to the cooling ducts. Regarding Claim 13, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 12. Jelinewski in view of Huber does not disclose wherein a position of minimum flow cross-section of the distribution channel is at an angular distance of about 1800 from the position of maximum flow cross-section on a circumference of the distribution channel. Huber further discloses (Fig 7, 18) wherein a position of minimum flow cross-section of the distribution channel is at an angular distance of about 1800 from the position of maximum flow cross-section on a circumference of the distribution channel. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have formed stator of Jelinewski modified by distribution channel of Huber in order to uniformly distribute cooling fluid to the cooling ducts. Regarding Claim 14, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 11. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses (Jelinewski, Fig 3) wherein the cooling channels (8) are evenly distributed about a circumference (Fig 3) of the stator core (3), and connected hydraulically to one of the two manifolds (4 or 5) according to an alternating pattern [Para 0044]. Regarding Claim 15, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 11. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses wherein each of the two manifolds (Jelinewski , 4,5) has outlet channels (12) hydraulically connected to the share of cooling channels (8) that are hydraulically connected to the distribution channel (7) of the respective other one (5,4) of the two manifolds, to receive the fluid from said share of cooling channels (8), wherein the outlet channels have at least one opening (9) for dispensing the fluid. Regarding Claim 16, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 11. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses wherein the distribution channel (Jelinewski ,7) is formed as a groove (Fig 2) in the manifold (4,5), the groove being closed by a housing [Para 0040 discloses “housing-affixed stator] encasing the stator core, wherein the housing has at least one inlet [Para 0012 discloses “housing section having a cooling duct” and distribution channels are connected to cooling duct] hydraulically connected to at least one of the distribution channels (7). Regarding Claim 17, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 16. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses wherein in a mounted position, the at least one inlet (Jelinewski, 11) is arranged in a position of maximum potential energy (this is inherent as flow takes place from higher pressure to lower pressure and higher pressure is same as higher potential energy. Examiner interprets “maximum” as being within the context of the fluid flow path. If Applicant intends gravity feeding of coolant, then it should be recited in the claims). Regarding Claim 18, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 11. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses wherein the manifolds (Jelinewski,4.5) have a positioning element to preserve a relative circumferential position [Para 0020 discloses “in the installed condition of the end plates at the stator, are positioned with respect to the axial ducts in such a way that coolant flows through each recess into a particular axial duct aligned therewith”] with respect to the stator core (3). Regarding Claim 20, Jelinewski in view of Huber discloses Electric machine stator according to claim 11. Jelinewski in view of Huber further discloses wherein the stator core (Jelinewski,3) is composed of a plurality of identical laminations (Fig 3 discloses identical 3 in axial direction). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 19 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 19 recites “ Electric machine stator according to claim 11, wherein the manifolds each have a gap in the circumferential direction, a resilient member being arranged between two surfaces facing the gap and biassing the two surfaces apart”. Neither Jelinewski nor Huber disclose this structure. In Jelinewski, there is no C shaped structure with a circumferential gap along with resilient member in between. Huber as well does not disclose the same structure. Therefore claim 19 is allowable. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISWANATHAN SUBRAMANIAN whose telephone number is (571)272-4814. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher M Koehler can be reached at 5712723560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VISWANATHAN SUBRAMANIAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603563
SUPERCONDUCTING MOTORS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597812
BEARING SUPPORT FORMING ELECTRO MAGNETIC SHIELD FOR RESOLVER POSITION SENSOR FOR A BRUSHLESS ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587056
Multipart Rotor for an Electric Machine, Electric Machine, and Motor Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580451
ROTOR DEVICE FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE INCLUDING A COOLING FLUID LINE, A COLLECTING RING, AND AN ADAPTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571426
MAGNETIC BEARING STATOR WITH IMPROVED BOBBINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month