Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/616,262

VIBRATION SENSOR

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
RAEVIS, ROBERT R
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
VEGA Grieshaber KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1543 granted / 1857 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
1930
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1857 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Objection The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the recess (claim 1) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. 112(b) Rejections Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. As to claim 1, “recess” is not consistent with the drawings, as drawings indicate that that element 32 is a straight hole in the piezo element 18. This specification employs the terms hole and recess, so there must be a distinction. Element 32 does not appear to be a recess in the drawings. As it’s unclear what the claim term “recess” is limited to, it follows that the claim is confused/indefinite. Is the recess (claim) a recess, or is the “recess” (claim) actually a hole, or is there some other version? Note that drawings are generally more powerful than written terms. What is Applicant’s position? As to claim 1, “an electrical connection” (line 4 from last) is indefinite because such is not electrically connected to anything in the claim. As such, how can the connection be meaningfully depicted as “electrical”? As to claim 5,”within the sensor” is confusing, as the body of the claim defines the entire sensor. What yet-to-be claimed structure is the disk “within”? As to claim 5, “recontacting” means what? What is contacting to what (for a second time?) As to claim 11, “the compensating elements” was never introduced. Is base claim 1 missing - - a compensating element - - ? 102/103 Rejection Claim(s) 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Lopatin CN 1729387. Lopatin CN 1729387 teach a device comprising: a membrane (membrane below piezo in (Figures 8-10,13-16,9,19) that can be set in vibration, a drive unit, wherein the drive unit comprises a piezo actuator (in same Figures above) which has a piezo element and multiple an electrodes 8 (inherent, shown only in Figures 6 and 7) with an electrode surface connected to the piezo element, an adhesive connection, with the aid of which the piezo actuator is operatively connected to the membrane in such a way that vibrations of the piezo actuator can be transmitted to the membrane fastening may be adhesive, solder and/or solder layer and/or the screw element screwed”), an electronic system (circuitry which leads 8 are connected to as shown in Figures 6 or 7), an electrical connection (bolt/screw) between the electronic system and the electrode surface, wherein the piezo element has a hole/recess (Figures 3,7-10,13-16,9,19; hole/recess occupied by bolt/screw) and the electrical connection (bolt) extends through this hole/recess. The Reference does not state that the bolt 17 is an electrical connection through the hole/recess. As to claims 1,3,4,10, either the bolt 17 is of conductive material, or one of ordinary skill would recognize that bolts are commonly of such material, and readily available for use, suggestive of so employing them. Either the visible conducting connection 8 (Figures 6,7) are employed to connected the electronic system to electrode, or one of ordinary skill would know to follow the connections as such are necessary. Also, the hole/recess in the piezo elements is as much a recess as claim. As to claim 2, the lowest arrows (show below) show vibration of bottom 12; the higher arrows cause the lowest arrow to vibrate. PNG media_image1.png 364 760 media_image1.png Greyscale As to claim 4, the piezo elements are round. As to claim 5, the piezo are annular discs, are withing the sensor framework, and are contacting elements all around. As to claim 6,7, the bolt is both within and connects, the head of which is on a side away from flexible elements (membrane). As to claim 8, “ fastening may be adhesive, solder and/or solder layer and/or the screw element screwed”. Adhesive will naturally enter some portion of the recess. As to claims 9,11, a first portion will affect the membrane, and thus compensate as much as claimed (or in the alternative, the “FIRST PORTION” (below positions the piezo element). PNG media_image2.png 358 866 media_image2.png Greyscale Prior Art not Applied The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Turner CN 101960272 teach a device, including: a membrane 11 that can be set in vibration, a drive unit, wherein the drive unit comprises a piezo actuator which has a piezo element (32,33,34) and an electrode 33 with an electrode surface connected to the piezo element, an vibrations of the piezo actuator can be transmitted to the membrane, an electronic system, an electrical connection 54 between the electronic system and the electrode surface, 1449 As to 1449 of 9/18/24 102019120685 was not in the electronic file; each of 3537117, 102016108553 and 102010120665 has only ABSTRACT, translation and lacked a drawing. As such, those 3 references were crossed out. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT R RAEVIS whose telephone number is (571)272-2204. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon to Fri from 8am to 4pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina DeHerrera, can be reached at telephone number 303-297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center to authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to the USPTO patent electronic filing system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via a variety of formats. See MPEP § 713.01. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/InterviewPractice. /ROBERT R RAEVIS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601853
MULTI-FUNCTIONAL MEASURING INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601304
ANOMALY DETERMINATION DEVICE FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597647
GAS ANALYSIS DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590862
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR INDUCING AUTOMOTIVE BODY VIBRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584742
METHOD FOR CORRECTING THE MEASUREMENT FROM A VIBRATING ANGULAR INERTIAL SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1857 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month