Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/616,742

ANALYSIS AND MEASUREMENT OF SIGNALS IN A MULTI-CHANNEL ANTENNA RECEIVER WITH MULTI-CHANNEL ANALOG-DIGITAL CONVERTERS (ADCS)

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
HSIEH, PING Y
Art Unit
2664
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Viavi Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
758 granted / 959 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
989
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
81.3%
+41.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§112
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 959 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 10-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 5/22/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4-9, 15, 16 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iancu (U.S. PG-PUB NO. 2005/0008098) ion view of Murata (U.S. PATENT NO. 12388491) and further in view of Seely (U.S. PG-PUB NO. 2014/0241469). -Regarding claim 1, Iancu discloses a test device to analyze radio frequency (RF) signals (FIG. 2), comprising: a multi-channel receiver comprising: a plurality of antennas to receive a plurality of RF input signals (antenna 20, 30, 40, FIG. 2); and a plurality of front ends coupled to the plurality of antennas to receive and pre-process the plurality of RF input signals (front end 22, 34, 44 , FIG. 2); a multiplexer to select a signal of interest among the down-converted plurality of RF input signals (multiplexer 52, paragraph 11). Iancu is silent to teaching that a plurality of mixers to down-convert the pre-processed plurality of RF input signals; a divider to direct the selected signal of interest to a plurality of analog-digital converter (ADC) channel inputs; and a multi-channel ADC subsystem comprising: a plurality of ADC channels to digitize the signal of interest simultaneously; and a field programmable gate array (FPGA) to combine digital output signals of the plurality of ADC channels. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Murata. In the same field of endeavor, Murata teaches a plurality of mixers to down-convert the pre-processed plurality of RF input signals (mixers 316, 326, 336, 346, FIG. 4); a divider to direct the selected signal of interest to a plurality of analog-digital converter (ADC) channel inputs (signal splitter 105, FIG. 4); and a multi-channel ADC subsystem comprising: a plurality of ADC channels to digitize the signal of interest simultaneously (ADC 114, 124, 134, 144, FIG. 4); and a field programmable gate array (FPGA) to combine digital output signals of the plurality of ADC channels (FPGA, col. 15 lines 60-65). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Iancu with the teaching of Murata in order to reduce or eliminate the uncanceled LO noise caused as a side effect of the path delay compensation. The combination is silent to teaching that through averaging. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Seely. In the same field of endeavor, Seely teaches through averaging (paragraph 59, FIG. 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of the combination with the teaching of Seely in order to improve signal-to-noise and improves the quality of the link and range. -Regarding claim 2, the combination further discloses the FPGA is to average the digital output signals of the plurality of multi-channel ADCs in a single layer of averaging or in multiple layers of averaging (Seely, paragraph 59, FIG. 3). -Regarding claim 4, the combination further discloses the multiplexer is to provide the signal of interest from two or more of the plurality of antennas to the divider (Iancu, multiplexer 52, paragraph 11). -Regarding claim 5, the combination further discloses one or more operational subsystems to perform analytical operations on the combined digital output signals (Iancu, digital signal processor (DSP) 50, paragraph 9). -Regarding claim 6, the combination further discloses one or more operational subsystems include at least one of a display subsystem, an analysis subsystem, a fast Fourier transform (FFT) subsystem, or a storage subsystem (Iancu, digital signal processor (DSP) 50, paragraph 9; Seely, DSP 134, memory device 138, paragraph 48). -Regarding claim 7, the combination further discloses the FPGA comprises one or more digital processing circuitry to receive and process the combined digital output signals (Seely, digital subsystem 126, FPGA 130, paragraph 48). -Regarding claim 8, the combination further discloses the test device is a spectrum analyzer (Seely, spectrum assessment, paragraph 134). -Regarding claim 9, the combination further discloses a plurality of switches to select between an output of the divider and individual outputs of the plurality of front ends (Iancu, switch 32, 42, FIG. 2). -Regarding claim 15, Iancu discloses a method, comprising: receiving two or more RF input signals through a plurality of antennas of a test device (antenna 20, 30, 40, FIG. 2); receiving a selection of one of the RF input signals as a signal of interest (DSP 50 provides a control signal on line 51 to the multiplexer 52, FIG. 2, paragraph 10-11). Iancu is silent to teaching that providing the signal of interest to two or more analog-digital converter (ADC) channel inputs of a multi-channel ADC subsystem of the test device; digitizing the signal of interest simultaneously at two or more ADC channels of the multi- channel ADC subsystem; and combining digital output signals of the two or more ADC channels. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Murata. In the same field of endeavor, Murata teaches providing the signal of interest to two or more analog-digital converter (ADC) channel inputs of a multi-channel ADC subsystem of the test device (signal splitter 105, FIG. 4); digitizing the signal of interest simultaneously at two or more ADC channels of the multi- channel ADC subsystem (ADC 114, 124, 134, 144, FIG. 4); and combining digital output signals of the two or more ADC channels (FPGA, col. 15 lines 60-65). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Iancu with the teaching of Murata in order to reduce or eliminate the uncanceled LO noise caused as a side effect of the path delay compensation. The combination is silent to teaching that averaging the digital output signals. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Seely. In the same field of endeavor, Seely teaches averaging the digital output signals (paragraph 59, FIG. 3). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of the combination with the teaching of Seely in order to improve signal-to-noise and improves the quality of the link and range. -Regarding claim 16, the combination further discloses combining the digital output signals comprises: averaging the digital output signals in a single layer of averaging or in multiple layers of averaging (Seely, paragraph 59, FIG. 3). -Regarding claim 18, the combination further discloses providing the signal of interest from two or more of the plurality of antennas to the two or more ADC channel inputs through a divider (Iancu, multiplexer 52, paragraph 11). -Regarding claim 19, the combination further discloses combining the digital output signals at one of a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or a central processing unit (CPU) of the test device (Iancu, digital signal processor (DSP) 50, paragraph 9). -Regarding claim 20, the combination further discloses selecting the two or more ADC inputs from an output of a divider of the test device and individual outputs of a plurality of front ends of the test device through a plurality of switches (Iancu, switch 32, 42, FIG. 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PING Y HSIEH whose telephone number is (571)270-3011. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Mehmood can be reached at (571) 272-2976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PING Y HSIEH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2664
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683590
TUNING DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671473
METHODS, DEVICES, AND SYSTEMS FOR BLIND ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING OF NARROWBAND SIGNALS WITH AN UNCALIBRATED ANTENNA ARRAY USING MACHINE LEARNING
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665682
CALIBRATION OF NON-CO-LOCATED POLARIZED ANTENNA ARRAYS
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659053
OPTICAL PATH POINTING APPARATUS, OPTICAL PATH POINTING METHOD, AND OPTICAL PATH POINTING SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12658954
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INCREASING RFID READ RANGE IN DAISY CHAIN CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 959 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month