Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/616,807

ACOUSTICALLY SWITCHED RADIO FREQUENCY FRONTEND CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2023 — provisional 63/498,568
Examiner
HSIEH, PING Y
Art Unit
2664
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qorvo US Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
763 granted / 964 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
999
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 964 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 8-10, 13 and 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mitsutsuka (U.S. PATENT NO. 4697115) in view of Loseu (U.S. PG-PUB NO. 2011/0309896). -Regarding claim 1, Mitsutuska discloses an acoustically switched circuit (semiconductor substrate 7, FIG. 1) comprising: a plurality of acoustic filter circuits each configured to pass an RF signal in a respective one of a plurality of passbands (At one end of the surface of the piezoelectric substrate 1 are disposed comb-shaped electrodes 2' constituting the input transducer 2, and at the other end are comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D constituting the output transducer 3, which are so formed that each of them responds only to a SAW within a respective one of four bands which differ from each other, col. 5 lines 3-42); and a plurality of acoustic structures each comprising at least one acoustic switch circuit coupled to a respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits, the at least one acoustic switch circuit (A surface acoustic wave travelling from the input transducer 2 to the output transducer 3 will have portions which travel along respective paths of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D to the respective electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and each of the electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D is elongate and is positioned over a respective path of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D so as to extend parallel thereto, col. 3 lines 38-65) is configured to: output the RF signal to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits in response to receiving a switching voltage (controlling the bias voltages VA, VB, VC, VD applied to the metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, it is possible to selectively permit and prevent surface acoustic waves from reaching each of the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, col. 5 lines 3-42). Mitsutuska is silent to teaching that radio frequency (RF) frontend; and receive a differential input of the RF signal. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Loseu. In the same field of endeavor, Loseu teaches radio frequency (RF) frontend; and receive a differential input of the RF signal (second and the third connection nodes 54, 56 provide a differential input 122 to the expanded two-track SAW device 100, and the first connection node 52 provides a single-ended output 124 from the expanded two-track SAW device 100, [0059]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Matsutsuka with the teaching of Loseu in order to interface the SAW input transducers directly with the differential (balanced) RF transceiver ports for common-mode nose rejection and impedance matching. -Regarding claim 2, the combination further discloses at least one of the plurality of acoustic structures comprises a second acoustic switch circuit coupled to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits and is configured to: receive a second differential input of the RF signal; and output the RF signal to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits in response to receiving the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, if the metal electrodes 10 are formed to be finer and are disposed so as to be closely adjacent to each other and if the pitch of the comb-shaped electrodes 3' varies continuously in the direction perpendicular to the propagation direction of a SAW, it is possible to selectively adjust the pass band by selecting the distribution of the bias voltages, col. 4 lines 37-52; Loseu, When a differential AC input signal is applied between the first and the fourth connection nodes 52, 128, the second and the eighth IDTs 80, 126, respectively, may convert the differential AC input signal into surface acoustic waves in the first SAW track 48, [0073]). -Regarding claim 3, the combination further discloses the at least one acoustic switch circuit in each of the plurality of acoustic structures comprises: an input interdigital transducer (IDT) configured to convert the differential input of the RF signal into a surface acoustic wave (SAW); an output IDT configured to convert the SAW into the RF signal; and an acoustic switch provided between the input IDT and the output IDT and configured to: pass the SAW from the input IDT to the output IDT in response to receiving the switching voltage; and block the SAW between the input IDT and the output IDT in absence of the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, Between the input comb-shaped electrodes 2' and the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D are disposed metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, col. 3 lines 38-65). -Regarding claim 6, the combination further discloses the at least one acoustic switch circuit in each of the plurality of acoustic structures comprises: a pair of differential input interdigital transducers (IDTs) configured to convert the differential input of the RF signal into a surface acoustic wave (SAW) (Loseu, When a differential AC input signal is applied between second and the third connection nodes 54, 56, the fifth and the sixth IDTs 90, 92, respectively, may convert the differential AC input signal into surface acoustic waves in the second SAW track 50, [0065]); an output IDT configured to convert the SAW into the RF signal (second IDT 80 may convert the surface acoustic waves in the first SAW track 48 into a single-ended AC output signal between the first connection node 52 and the internal ground connection node 58, [0065]); and an acoustic switch provided between the pair of differential input IDTs and the output IDT and configured to: pass the SAW from the pair of differential input IDTs to the output IDT in response to receiving the switching voltage; and block the SAW between the pair of differential input IDTs and the output IDT in absence of the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, A surface acoustic wave travelling from the input transducer 2 to the output transducer 3 will have portions which travel along respective paths of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D to the respective electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and each of the electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D is elongate and is positioned over a respective path of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D so as to extend parallel thereto, col. 3 lines 38-65; controlling the bias voltages VA, VB, VC, VD applied to the metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, it is possible to selectively permit and prevent surface acoustic waves from reaching each of the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, col. 5 lines 3-42). -Regarding claim 8, Matsutsuka discloses a device comprising: an acoustically switched (semiconductor substrate 7, FIG. 1) the acoustically switched radio frequency (RF) circuit comprises: a plurality of acoustic filter circuits each configured to pass an RF signal in a respective one of a plurality of passbands (At one end of the surface of the piezoelectric substrate 1 are disposed comb-shaped electrodes 2' constituting the input transducer 2, and at the other end are comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D constituting the output transducer 3, which are so formed that each of them responds only to a SAW within a respective one of four bands which differ from each other, col. 5 lines 3-42); and a plurality of acoustic structures each comprising at least one acoustic switch circuit coupled to a respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits, the at least one acoustic switch circuit (A surface acoustic wave travelling from the input transducer 2 to the output transducer 3 will have portions which travel along respective paths of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D to the respective electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and each of the electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D is elongate and is positioned over a respective path of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D so as to extend parallel thereto, col. 3 lines 38-65) is configured to: and output the RF signal to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits in response to receiving a switching voltage (controlling the bias voltages VA, VB, VC, VD applied to the metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, it is possible to selectively permit and prevent surface acoustic waves from reaching each of the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, col. 5 lines 3-42). Mitsutuska is silent to teaching that a wireless device; transmit circuitry, receive circuitry, and antenna switching circuitry coupled to the transmit circuitry and the receive circuitry; radio frequency (RF) frontend circuit provided in any one or more of the transmit circuitry, the receive circuitry, and the antenna switching circuitry; and receive a differential input of the RF signal. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Loseu. In the same field of endeavor, Loseu teaches a wireless device (mobile terminal, FIG. 32); transmit circuitry (radio frequency transmitter section 196, FIG. 32), receive circuitry (receiver front end 194, FIG. 32), and antenna switching circuitry coupled to the transmit circuitry and the receive circuitry (narrow band duplexer 190, FIG. 32); radio frequency (RF) frontend circuit provided in any one or more of the transmit circuitry, the receive circuitry, and the antenna switching circuitry; and receive a differential input of the RF signal ( second and the third connection nodes 54, 56 provide a differential input 122 to the expanded two-track SAW device 100, and the first connection node 52 provides a single-ended output 124 from the expanded two-track SAW device 100, [0059]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Matsutsuka with the teaching of Loseu in order to interface the SAW input transducers directly with the differential (balanced) RF transceiver ports for common-mode nose rejection and impedance matching. -Regarding claim 9, the combination further discloses at least one of the plurality of acoustic structures comprises a second acoustic switch circuit coupled to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits and is configured to: receive a second differential input of the RF signal; and output the RF signal to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits in response to receiving the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, if the metal electrodes 10 are formed to be finer and are disposed so as to be closely adjacent to each other and if the pitch of the comb-shaped electrodes 3' varies continuously in the direction perpendicular to the propagation direction of a SAW, it is possible to selectively adjust the pass band by selecting the distribution of the bias voltages, col. 4 lines 37-52; Loseu, When a differential AC input signal is applied between the first and the fourth connection nodes 52, 128, the second and the eighth IDTs 80, 126, respectively, may convert the differential AC input signal into surface acoustic waves in the first SAW track 48, [0073]). -Regarding claim 10, the combination further discloses the at least one acoustic switch circuit in each of the plurality of acoustic structures comprises: an input interdigital transducer (IDT) configured to convert the differential input of the RF signal into a surface acoustic wave (SAW); an output IDT configured to convert the SAW into the RF signal; and an acoustic switch provided between the input IDT and the output IDT and configured to: pass the SAW from the input IDT to the output IDT in response to receiving the switching voltage; and block the SAW between the input IDT and the output IDT in absence of the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, Between the input comb-shaped electrodes 2' and the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D are disposed metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, col. 3 lines 38-65). -Regarding claim 13, the combination further discloses the at least one acoustic switch circuit in each of the plurality of acoustic structures comprises: a pair of differential input interdigital transducers (IDTs) configured to convert the differential input of the RF signal into a surface acoustic wave (SAW) (Loseu, When a differential AC input signal is applied between second and the third connection nodes 54, 56, the fifth and the sixth IDTs 90, 92, respectively, may convert the differential AC input signal into surface acoustic waves in the second SAW track 50, [0065]); an output IDT configured to convert the SAW into the RF signal (second IDT 80 may convert the surface acoustic waves in the first SAW track 48 into a single-ended AC output signal between the first connection node 52 and the internal ground connection node 58, [0065]); and an acoustic switch provided between the pair of differential input IDTs and the output IDT and configured to: pass the SAW from the pair of differential input IDTs to the output IDT in response to receiving the switching voltage; and block the SAW between the pair of differential input IDTs and the output IDT in absence of the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, A surface acoustic wave travelling from the input transducer 2 to the output transducer 3 will have portions which travel along respective paths of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D to the respective electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and each of the electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D is elongate and is positioned over a respective path of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D so as to extend parallel thereto, col. 3 lines 38-65; controlling the bias voltages VA, VB, VC, VD applied to the metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, it is possible to selectively permit and prevent surface acoustic waves from reaching each of the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, col. 5 lines 3-42). -Regarding claim 15, Matsutsuka discloses a method for configuring an acoustically switched (semiconductor substrate 7, FIG. 1) comprising: configuring a plurality of acoustic filter circuits to each pass an RF signal in a respective one of a plurality of passbands (At one end of the surface of the piezoelectric substrate 1 are disposed comb-shaped electrodes 2' constituting the input transducer 2, and at the other end are comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D constituting the output transducer 3, which are so formed that each of them responds only to a SAW within a respective one of four bands which differ from each other, col. 5 lines 3-42); providing at least one acoustic switch circuit in each of a plurality of acoustic structures coupled to a respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits (A surface acoustic wave travelling from the input transducer 2 to the output transducer 3 will have portions which travel along respective paths of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D to the respective electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, and each of the electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D is elongate and is positioned over a respective path of travel 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D so as to extend parallel thereto, col. 3 lines 38-65); and outputting, from the at least one acoustic switch circuit, the RF signal to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits in response to receiving a switching voltage (controlling the bias voltages VA, VB, VC, VD applied to the metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, it is possible to selectively permit and prevent surface acoustic waves from reaching each of the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, col. 5 lines 3-42). Mitsutuska is silent to teaching that radio frequency (RF) frontend; and receiving, in the at least one acoustic switch circuit, a differential input of the RF signal. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Loseu. In the same field of endeavor, Loseu teaches radio frequency (RF) frontend; and receiving, in the at least one acoustic switch circuit, a differential input of the RF signal (second and the third connection nodes 54, 56 provide a differential input 122 to the expanded two-track SAW device 100, and the first connection node 52 provides a single-ended output 124 from the expanded two-track SAW device 100, [0059]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Matsutsuka with the teaching of Loseu in order to interface the SAW input transducers directly with the differential (balanced) RF transceiver ports for common-mode nose rejection and impedance matching. -Regarding claim 16, the combination further discloses receiving, using a second acoustic switch circuit provided in at least one of the plurality of acoustic structures, a second differential input of the RF signal; and outputting, from the second acoustic switch circuit, the RF signal to the respective one of the plurality of acoustic filter circuits in response to receiving the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, if the metal electrodes 10 are formed to be finer and are disposed so as to be closely adjacent to each other and if the pitch of the comb-shaped electrodes 3' varies continuously in the direction perpendicular to the propagation direction of a SAW, it is possible to selectively adjust the pass band by selecting the distribution of the bias voltages, col. 4 lines 37-52; Loseu, When a differential AC input signal is applied between the first and the fourth connection nodes 52, 128, the second and the eighth IDTs 80, 126, respectively, may convert the differential AC input signal into surface acoustic waves in the first SAW track 48, [0073]). -Regarding claim 17, the combination further discloses constructing the at least one acoustic switch circuit to include: an input interdigital transducer (IDT) configured to convert the differential input of the RF signal into a surface acoustic wave (SAW); an output IDT configured to convert the SAW into the RF signal; and an acoustic switch provided between the input IDT and the output IDT and configured to: pass the SAW from the input IDT to the output IDT in response to receiving the switching voltage; and block the SAW between the input IDT and the output IDT in absence of the switching voltage (Matsutsuka, Between the input comb-shaped electrodes 2' and the output comb-shaped electrodes 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D are disposed metal electrodes 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, col. 3 lines 38-65). Claim(s) 7, 14 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mitsutsuka (U.S. PATENT NO. 4697115) in view of Loseu (U.S. PG-PUB NO. 2011/0309896) and further in view of Sun (U.S. PG-PUB NO. 2022/0385272). -Regarding claim 7, the combination is silent to teaching that the plurality of acoustic filter circuits each comprises a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) acoustic ladder network. However, the claimed limitation is well known in the art as evidenced by Sun. In the same field of endeavor, Sun teaches the plurality of acoustic filter circuits each comprises a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) acoustic ladder network (bulk acoustic wave (BAW), [0079]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of the combination with the teaching of Sun in order to improve spurious performance. -Regarding claim 14, the combination further discloses the plurality of acoustic filter circuits each comprises a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) acoustic ladder network (Sun, bulk acoustic wave (BAW), [0079]). -Regarding claim 20, the combination further discloses the plurality of acoustic filter circuits each comprises a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) acoustic ladder network (Sun, bulk acoustic wave (BAW), [0079]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 11, 12, 18 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PING Y HSIEH whose telephone number is (571)270-3011. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Mehmood can be reached at (571) 272-2976. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PING Y HSIEH/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2664
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 15, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750435
FOLDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING ANTENNA
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739010
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12725900
ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED MONOLITHIC WAVEGUIDE TRANSMISSION LINE WITH STEPPED MODE TRANSITION
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720316
METHOD FOR DIRECT COMMUNICATION, AND USER EQUIPMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12718526
IMAGE PROCESSING FOR PERSON RECOGNITION
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 9m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 964 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month