Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/616,831

HIGH EFFICIENCY POWER SPLIT CONTINUOUSLY VARIABLE TRANSMISSION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
Mar 27, 2023 — provisional 63/577,080
Examiner
RUSHING, JR, BOBBY
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hydracharge LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
382 granted / 501 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
527
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
76.0%
+36.0% vs TC avg
§102
15.5%
-24.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 501 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: paragraph 0079 of the specification as filed on September 15, 2025 and amended on December 30, 2026 defines item 20 as an “output shaft” and an “input shaft” while paragraph 0080 defines item 20 as “The input member”. Please clarify whether item 20 is an input shaft, output shaft or could serve as both an input shaft and an output shaft. Also, Applicant misspelled cylinder at paragraphs 0079 and 0080, spelling it “cylindar”. Claim Objections Claim 37 is objected to because of the following informalities: Applicant may wish to review and amend the claim for proper grammar. For example, should the claim read “to provide a passage to a reservoir from the positive displacement hydraulic mechanism”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Saitou et al. (US 7,082,761). Saitou discloses and shows a transmission comprising: a first rotating member (5), such as a shaft, coupled to receive power from a source; a second rotating member (6) constrained to rotate coaxially with the first rotating member; a fixed positive displacement hydraulic mechanism (M) such as an axial piston device with portions thereof positioned on and between said first and second members such that a volume is displaced and thus hydraulic flow by relative angular motions between them; a plurality of rotary couplings positioned on either first, second or both said rotating members in fluid communication to receive or disperse said hydraulic flow; and a variable displacement hydraulic mechanism (31) in fluid communication with said rotary couplings and coupled to said second rotating member. Cl. 2 – a load (see Fig. 5) is coupled to said second member. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 25 and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Saitou as applied to claim 1 in view of Zulu (US 5,396,768). Saitou discloses and shows the invention of claim 1 as described elsewhere above. Regarding claim 25, Saitou does not include an electric drive motor. However, the use of an electric motor or not is deemed to be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention in lieu of MPEP 2114 (I) which states, "A claim containing a 'recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus' if the prior art apparatus teaches all the structural (emphasis added) limitations of the claim". Ex parte Masham, 2 USPQ2d 1647 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1987) Cl. 37 – a third rotary coupling (Zulu, 38) is operably constructed to provide a passage to a reservoir (40) from the positive displacement hydraulic mechanism to accommodate leakages. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 23, 24, 31 and 34-36 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant' s arguments with respect to the rejected claims have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BOBBY RUSHING, JR whose telephone number is (571)270-0501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached at (571) 270-7778. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BOBBY RUSHING, JR/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 18, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673712
Cargo Transport System and Method
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668121
STRUCTURE FOR MULTI-DIRECTIONAL DRIVING AND STEERING OF FOUR-WHEELED VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669174
SHIFT PLATE CONTROL PANEL FOR OFF-ROAD VEHICLE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669169
WORKING VEHICLE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663074
SHIFT DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+13.7%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 501 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month