Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/616,920

CERAMIC ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
MCFADDEN, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiyo Yuden Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
701 granted / 815 resolved
+18.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
840
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 815 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I in the reply filed on 10/20/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 9-10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10/20/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the inflection point" of claim 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by FUKUNAGA et al (US 2020/0066446). Regarding claim 1, FUKUNAGA discloses a ceramic electronic device (Fig. 1-10) comprising: a multilayer chip (Fig. 2, 10) having a multilayer portion (Fig. 6, 60) in which each of a plurality of dielectric layers (Fig. 2, 12) and each of a plurality of internal electrode layers (Fig. 2, 13) are alternately stacked, wherein the plurality of internal electrode layers are extracted alternately to two end faces (Fig. 2, 15a/b) of the multilayer chip facing each other (Fig. 2), wherein the multilayer chip has a side margin (Fig. 3, 23) outside a capacity section in which the plurality of dielectric layers and the plurality of internal electrode layers face each other (Fig. 3), in a third direction (Fig. 1, W) orthogonal to a first direction (Fig. 1, T) in which the plurality of internal electrode layers face each other and a second direction (Fig. 1, L) in which the two end faces face each other (Fig. 1), wherein the multilayer chip has cover layers (Fig. 3, 22) of which a main component is ceramic ([0051]), on an upper face and a lower face of the capacity section in the first direction (Fig. 2), wherein each of the side margin and the cover layers has, on a side of an outer surface, a high concentration portion (Fig. 3, 23a/22a) of a subcomponent of at least one of Si ([0052/0065]), Mn, Cu, Fe, V, Ni, B, Mg, Ho, Dy, Er, Tm, Yb, Gd, Li, Co, Sm and Y, and wherein a concentration of the subcomponent of the high concentration portion is higher than that of a portion closer to the capacity section than the high concentration portion ([0052/0065]). Regarding claim 6, FUKUNAGA further discloses that, in the high concentration portion, the subcomponent exists in a form of a single element (Si [0052-0053]), an oxide crystal, or glass. Regarding claim 8, FUKUNAGA discloses a ceramic electronic device (Fig. 1-10) comprising: a multilayer chip (Fig. 2, 10) having a multilayer portion (Fig. 6, 60) in which each of a plurality of dielectric layers (Fig. 2, 12) and each of a plurality of internal electrode layers (Fig. 2, 13) are alternately stacked, wherein the plurality of internal electrode layers are extracted alternately to two end faces (Fig. 2, 15a/b) of the multilayer chip facing each other (Fig. 2), wherein the multilayer chip has a side margin (Fig. 3, 23) outside a capacity section in which the plurality of dielectric layers and the plurality of internal electrode layers face each other (Fig. 3), in a third direction (Fig. 1, W) orthogonal to a first direction (Fig. 1, T) in which the plurality of internal electrode layers face each other and a second direction (Fig. 1, L) in which the two end faces face each other (Fig. 1), wherein the multilayer chip has cover layers (Fig. 3, 22) of which a main component is ceramic ([0051]), on an upper face and a lower face of the capacity section in the first direction (Fig. 2), wherein each of the side margin and the cover layers has, on a side of an outer surface, a high concentration portion (Fig. 3, 23a/22a) of a subcomponent of at least one of Si ([0052/0065]), Mn, Cu, Fe, V, Ni, B, Mg, Ho, Dy, Er, Tm, Yb, Gd, Li, Co, Sm and Y, wherein a concentration of the subcomponent of the high concentration portion is higher than that of a portion closer to the capacity section than the high concentration portion ([0052/0065]), and wherein the high concentration portion is located within a range of 5.2% to 76% from the outer surface with respect to a thinner one of a thickness of the side margin and a thickness of the cover layers (Fig. 3, at least some of the high concentration region is in that range). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 4-5, and 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 2, 4-5, and 7, the prior art fails to teach or make obvious, alone or in combination, the limitation of “wherein the high concentration portion is a portion from an inflection point of the concentration of the subcomponent to the outer surface, and wherein the inflection point is a point that satisfies dD/dd ≥ 35 when a normalized intensity (D (%)) normalized by setting intensity to intensity/maximum intensity × 100 and a distance from the capacity section to the outer surface is d (μm) when acquiring an EPMA line spectrum from the capacity section to the outer surface” in combination with the other claim limitations. Additional Relevant Prior Art: TANAKA et al (US 2017/0018363) teaches relevant art in Fig. 1-10. Mizuno et al (US 2017/0243697) teaches relevant art in Fig. 1-4. Kowase (US 2018/0182555) teaches relevant art in Fig. 1-4. SAKATE et al (US 2018/0261389) teaches relevant art in Fig. 1-4. LEE et al (US 2020/0402717) teaches relevant art in Fig. 1-6. MIZUNO (US 2022/0285100) teaches relevant art in Fig. 1-8. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P MCFADDEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5649. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thur 8am-9pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at (571) 272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL P MCFADDEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592346
MONOLITHIC MULTILAYERED CERAMIC CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590195
POLYPROPYLENE FILM, POLYPROPYLENE FILM INTEGRATED WITH METAL LAYER, AND FILM CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592339
MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586727
MULTILAYERED CAPACITOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586718
MULTILAYER CERAMIC ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 815 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month