Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/616,985

MOISTURE MEASURING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2021 — JP 2021-158191 +1 more
Examiner
SHAH, JAY B
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
222 granted / 386 resolved
-12.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
418
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.9%
-29.1% vs TC avg
§103
65.4%
+25.4% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 386 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6-7, 12-13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 (7 by dependency) recites that one or more engagement claws are located apart from the first principal surface. It is unclear how this can be if claim 1 requires the one or more attaching members (which includes the claws) to overlap the substrate in the first principal surface of the substrate. Claim 7 recites that there is a distance between each of the one or more engagement claws and the first principal surface. It is unclear how this can be if claim 1 requires the one or more attaching members (which includes the claws) to overlap the substrate in the first principal surface of the substrate. Claim 12 (13 by dependency) “recites wherein the one or more attaching members are disposed farther from the biosensor than is the processing unit”. It is unclear what this means. Are the attaching members further from the biosensor than they are from the processing unit? Or are the attaching members at a further distance from the biosensor than the processing unit is from the biosensor? Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record (Baker et al. - US 2008/0139953 A1) while teaching a biosensor and processor also teaches a retention clip to mechanically secure communication and computation modules. Baker, however does not mention the use of attaching members such that a total area of one or more overlap regions in which the one or more attaching members overlap the substrate in the first principal surface of the substrate when viewed in a direction perpendicular to the first principal surface of the substrate is smaller than a sensor area of the sensor surface of the biosensor. Examiner further notes that the use of such attachment members is not a design choice, as the Specification clearly states that the purpose of the attaching members’ configuration is to reduce parasitic capacitance arising from the capacitive coupling between the substrate and a member in contact with the substrate. Therefore Examiner notes that there is criticality to the limitations of the claimed invention. None of the prior art considered, alone or in combination, teaches that particular feature combined with the other limitations of the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY B SHAH whose telephone number is (571)272-0686. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Robertson can be reached at 571-272-5001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAY SHAH Primary Examiner Art Unit 3791 /JAY B SHAH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672794
LIVING-BODY MONITORING DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667325
INSPIRATION SYSTEM RELATED SYMPTOM SENSING SYSTEM, APPARATUS, AND METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661437
THORACIC POST-SURGICAL MONITORING AND COMPLICATION PREDICTION
5y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661031
MEASURING APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653450
Wearable Sensor for Continuous Monitoring of Tissue Mechanics
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+7.2%)
3y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 386 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month