Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/617,620

EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DETECTOR ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Examiner
FOX, DANIELLE A
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
UNITED IMAGING HEALTHCARE NORTH AMERICA, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
590 granted / 711 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
740
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 711 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
9DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US2019/0212457 (LI). Regarding claim 1, LI disclose a detector micro-block for emission computed tomography (ECT), comprising: detector units arranged side by side along a second direction (Fig. 11a and 11b), wherein each of the detector units includes: crystal elements (411) that are arranged in crystal element rows along the second direction and crystal element columns along a first direction perpendicular to the second direction (Fig. 11a and 11b), each crystal element having a first end and a second end and extending from the first end to the second end along a third direction perpendicular to the first direction and the second direction (Fig. 11a and 11b); and an optical sensor array (421) including optical sensors arranged along the first direction (Fig. 11a and 11b); wherein the first ends of the crystal elements in each crystal element row are optically coupled with one optical sensor of the optical sensor array (Fig. 11a and 11b), and an optical bridge is configured at the second ends of the crystal elements in each crystal element column (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 2, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein for each crystal element column of each detector unit, an optical separator is configured between each pair of adjacent crystal elements in the crystal element column (412), the optical separator extends from the first ends of the corresponding pair of adjacent crystal elements without reaching the second ends of the corresponding pair of adjacent crystal elements (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 3, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 2, wherein the second ends of the crystal elements in each crystal element column are integrated into an integral part that serves as the optical bridge (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 4, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 2, wherein the optical bridge of each crystal element column comprises: a light transmitter configured between each pair of adjacent crystal elements in the crystal element column, the light transmitter extends from the second ends of the corresponding pair adjacent crystal elements to the optical separator between the corresponding pair of adjacent crystal elements (Fig. 7). Regarding claim 5, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein for each detector unit, an optical separator is configured between each pair of adjacent crystal element columns in the detector unit, the optical separator extends from the first ends of the crystal elements in the corresponding pair of adjacent crystal element columns to the second ends of the crystal elements in the corresponding pair of crystal element columns (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 6, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein for each crystal element column of each detector unit, an optical separator is configured between each pair of adjacent crystal elements in the crystal element column, the optical separator extends from the first ends of the corresponding pair of adjacent crystal elements to the second ends of the corresponding pair of adjacent crystal elements, and the optical bridge includes a light transmitter covering the second ends of the crystal elements in the crystal element column (Fig. 11a and 11b, Fig. 7). Regarding claim 7, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein a second optical bridge is configured between each pair of adjacent detector units in the detector micro-block (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 8, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein an optical separator is configured between each pair of adjacent detector units in the detector micro-block, the optical separator extends from the second ends of the crystal elements in the corresponding pair of adjacent detector units without reaching the first ends of the crystal elements in the corresponding pair of adjacent detector units (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 9, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein for each detector unit, two crystal elements are arranged in each crystal element column of the detector unit along the first direction, and two crystal elements are arranged in each crystal element row of the detector unit along the second direction (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 10, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 1, wherein each crystal element has a long side along the first direction and a short side along the second direction, the length of the long side along the first direction is larger than the length of the short side along the second direction (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 11, LI disclose the detector micro-block of claim 10, wherein a ratio of the length of the long side along the first direction and the length of the short side along the second direction is greater than 1 and less than 5 (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 12, LI disclose a detector block for emission computed tomography (ECT), comprising a plurality of detector micro-blocks of claim 10 arranged in a block array (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 13, LI disclose the detector block of claim 12, wherein the short sides of the crystal elements in the plurality of detector micro-blocks are parallel to each other (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 14, LI disclose the detector block of claim 12, wherein the short sides of the crystal elements in one or more first detector micro-blocks of the plurality of detector micro-blocks are perpendicular to the short sides of the crystal elements in one or more second detector micro-blocks of the plurality of detector micro-blocks (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 15, LI disclose the detector block of claim 14, wherein each pair of adjacent detector micro-blocks in the plurality of detector micro-blocks include one first detector micro-block and one second detector micro-block to form a checkerboard structure (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 16, LI disclose the detector block of claim 15, wherein the detector block includes first sub-blocks and second sub-blocks, each of the first sub-blocks and the second sub-blocks includes multiple detector micro-blocks, the detector micro-blocks of each first sub-block have a first arrangement manner, the detector micro-blocks of each second sub-block have a second arrangement manner different from the first arrangement manner (Fig. 11a and 11b). Regarding claim 17, LI disclose a method for identifying positions of photon gamma interactions, implemented on a computing machine having one or more processors and one or more storage devices, the method comprising: obtaining output information of the optical sensors of the detector micro-block according to claim 1 (Fig. 11a and 11b, Fig. 16 and 17); and determining, based on the output information of the optical sensors, position information of a photon gamma interaction that occurs in the crystal elements of the detector micro-block according to claim 1 (Fig. 11a and 11b; Fig. 16 and 17). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 18, LI disclose a method for emission computed tomography (ECT), implemented on a computing machine having one or more processors and one or more storage devices, the method comprising: obtaining output information of the optical sensors of the plurality of detector micro-blocks of the detector block according to claim 14 (Fig. 16 and 17); dividing the output information into a first subset and a second subset, the first subset corresponding to the optical sensors of the one or more first detector micro-blocks, the second subset corresponding to the optical sensors of the one or more second detector micro-blocks (Fig. 16 and 17). LI fails to teach the details of generating a first ECT image based on the first subset; and generating a second ECT image based on the second subset. Claims 19 and 20 depend on claim 18. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANI FOX whose telephone number is (571)272-3513. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANI FOX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603243
X-RAY EMITTER AND MOBILE X-RAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588880
PORTABLE RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING APPARATUS AND RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590909
X-RAY INSPECTION APPARATUS AND SENSITIVITY CORRECTION METHOD FOR X-RAY INSPECTION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585033
X-RAY DETECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578257
Device and Method for Detecting Reactive Luminescent Particles in Carbon-Based Nanomaterials
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 711 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month