Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/617,662

PRINTING DEVICE AND PRINTING METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
42%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 42% of resolved cases
42%
Career Allow Rate
567 granted / 1335 resolved
-25.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
151 currently pending
Career history
1486
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1335 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kondo (2021/0291515). Regarding claims 1 and 5, Kondo teaches a printing device and method for printing on a medium, the printing device comprising: a print head (fig. 2, item 22) configured to form a plurality of dots on the medium by ejecting a first liquid (fig. 2, yellow ink) and a second liquid (fig. 2, black ink), the print head including a first nozzle array (fig. 2, 26Y) in which a plurality of nozzles for ejecting the first liquid to the medium are arranged along a first direction (fig. 2, D3) and a second nozzle array (fig. 2, 26K) in which a plurality of nozzles for ejecting the second liquid, which is different in color from the first liquid, to the medium are arranged along the first direction (see fig. 2)and a control section (fig. 1, item 10) configured to execute printing by repeating main scanning in which the first liquid and the second liquid are ejected from the print head while a relative position of the print head with respect to the medium is changed in a second direction (fig. 4, direction D1) that intersects the first direction and sub-scanning in which the relative position of the print head with respect to the medium is changed by f dots along the first direction (see fig. 4), f being a natural number, wherein the plurality of nozzles included in the first nozzle array are dividable into a first nozzle group including m nozzles located on one end side in the first direction, m being a natural number satisfying f > m > 1, a second nozzle group including m nozzles located on another end side in the first direction, and a third nozzle group including a plurality of nozzles located in between the first nozzle group and the second nozzle group (see fig. 4, note that the sub-scanning movement is 72 nozzles, and thus f = 72, and note that m is being taken to be 5, meaning the first and second nozzle groups contain 5 nozzles at the extremes of the first nozzle array, and the third nozzle group contains the 70 nozzles in between the first and second nozzle groups), the plurality of nozzles included in the second nozzle array are dividable into a fourth nozzle group including n nozzles located on the one end side in the first direction, wherein n is a natural number satisfying m > n > 1, a fifth nozzle group including n nozzles located on the other end side in the first direction, and a sixth nozzle group including a plurality of nozzles located in between the fourth nozzle group and the fifth nozzle group (see fig. 4, note that the sub-scanning movement is 72 nozzles, and thus f = 72, and note that n is being taken to be 4, meaning the fourth and fifth nozzle groups contain 4 nozzles at the extremes of the second nozzle array, and the sixth nozzle group contains the 72 nozzles in between the fourth and fifth nozzle groups), and the control section is configured to switch, according to whether f consecutive raster lines are to be formed by the first liquid or the second liquid, a printing mode between a first mode in which the control section is configured to form by forming m raster lines by the nozzles included in the first nozzle group, by the nozzles included in the second nozzle group, and by the nozzles included in the third nozzle group, and form other f-m raster lines by two or more nozzles included in the third nozzle group and when f consecutive raster lines are to be formed by the second liquid (see fig. 4, note that m = 5 raster lines as well as f - m = 65 raster lines are formed by other nozzles in the third nozzle group, and note that all nozzles in all groups are being presumed to form raster lines), a second mode in which the control section is configured to form the f consecutive raster lines by the second liquid by forming n raster lines by the nozzles included in the fourth nozzle group, by the nozzles included in the fifth nozzle group, and by the nozzles included in the sixth nozzle group, and form other f-n raster lines by two or more nozzles included in the sixth nozzle group (see fig. 4, note that n = 4 raster lines as well as f - n = 68 raster lines are formed by other nozzles in the sixth nozzle group, and note that all nozzles in all groups are being presumed to form raster lines). (see fig. 2, Note that the yellow printhead and black printhead are positioned at different positions in the second direction and are switched on and off when they start and finish scanning movements. Thus, there is a certain period of time one both ends of the scan path when only the yellow head is printing and only the black head is printing. Further, note that “mode” has not been defined within the claim with very much specificity, and thus Examiner wonders how simply printing with either yellow or black at any given time cannot be considered a mode. Note that another interpretation could be that black and white printing, where only the black head is used could constitute the second mode, and a color printing mode, in which the yellow head is used with or without the black printhead could be the first mode). Regarding claim 2, Kondo teaches the printing device according to claim 1, wherein the first liquid is a chromatic liquid and the second liquid is an achromatic liquid (Note that yellow and black inks meet the limitation). Regarding claim 3, Kondo teaches the printing device according to claim 2, wherein the second liquid has a viscosity higher than that of the first liquid (Note that black ink is more viscous than colored ink). Regarding claim 4, Kondo teaches the printing device according to claim 1, wherein the second liquid is a color having a lower brightness in the Lab color space than does the first liquid (Note that black ink has a lower brightness in the LAB color space than yellow). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/11/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The claims have been amended to further specify the operation of the device, but the amendment fails to distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. The rejections above have been updated to reflect the changes to the claims. The standing prior art rejection is maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DOUGLAS X. RODRIGUEZ can be reached at 571-431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 11, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600127
INKJET ASSEMBLY, INKJET PRINTING APPARATUS AND INKJET PRINTING METHOD FOR USE IN PREPARATION OF DISPLAY COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583238
PAPER SUPPLY CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576644
RECORDING DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING RECORDING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570101
RECORDING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12558904
DROP-ON-DEMAND INK DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH TANKLESS RECIRCULATION FOR CARD PROCESSING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
42%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1335 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month