Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/617,823

END-TO-END IMS NETWORK SLICING

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Examiner
TODD, GREGORY G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Verizon Communications Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
35%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allowance Rate
174 granted / 449 resolved
-19.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
494
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
68.6%
+28.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 449 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is a first office action in response to application filed, with the above serial number, on 27 March 2024 in which claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Claims 1-20 are therefore pending in the application. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: The claim has a typo “sliceis” in line 6. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Foti (hereinafter “Foti”, 2021/0036919). As per Claim 1, Foti discloses a method, comprising: receiving first performance requirements associated with a first network slice of a mobile network (at least paragraph 4, 75; eg. ultra reliable low latency communication or emergency service need of 5GS network slice; Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) including a Service type SST); determining, based on the first performance requirements, first configuration data associated with a first Internet Protocol (IP) Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) network slice of an IMS network, wherein the first IMS network slice is linked to the first network slice of the mobile network (at least paragraph 75-77; UE can be configured with mapping rules to map a 5GS slive type to IMS network slice type; eg. emergency 5G System (5GS) network slice can map to an IMS emergency network slice or a 5GS enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) network slice can map to an IMS VoLTE network slice); and configuring and provisioning, based on the first configuration data, the first IMS network slice in the IMS network (at least paragraph 75, 82; UE 410 sends a registration message including the NS-ID of the requested IMS network slice 412 to an appropriate P-CSCF 416 (step 500). The registration message includes additional information such as, e.g., the IMPI and IMPU of the UE 410. The requested IMS network slice 412 is the one of the IMS network slices 412 that is used for a particular service desired by the UE 410. Note that the mapping between the IMS network slices 412 (i.e., the NS-IDs of the IMS network slices 412) and the respective services is known to the UE 410, e.g., via configuration or via a predefined mapping hard-coded or otherwise stored at the UE 410. Also, the appropriate P-CSCF 416 is determined by the UE 410). As per Claim 2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the first configuration data further comprises: translating the performance requirements into configuration parameters for the first IMS network slice (at least paragraph 75, 82; requested IMS network slice 412 is the one of the IMS network slices 412 that is used for a particular service desired by the UE 410. Note that the mapping between the IMS network slices 412 (i.e., the NS-IDs of the IMS network slices 412) and the respective services is known to the UE 410, e.g., via configuration or via a predefined mapping hard-coded or otherwise stored at the UE 410). As per Claim 3. The method of claim 2, wherein configuring and provisioning the first IMS network slice further comprises: instantiating at least one of Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) or Cloud-Native Network Functions (CNFs) in the IMS network; and provisioning the configuration parameters to the at least one of VNFs or CNFs (at least paragraph 58-60, 3, 52; each service in a network slice/virtual network; fig. 2). As per Claim 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving second performance requirements associated with a second network slice of the mobile network; determining, based on the second performance requirements, second configuration data associated with a second IMS network slice of the IMS network, wherein the second IMS network slice is linked to the second network slice of the mobile network, of the IMS network; and configuring and provisioning, based on the second configuration data, the second IMS network slice in the IMS network (see claim 1 for similar claim mapping of first instance, with claim 4 being a second instance of same functionality; at least Fig. 2; eg. 5GS network slice 1 for service 1 and 5GS network slice 2 for service 2 and respective mapped IMS first slice and 2nd IMS slice). As per Claim 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first IMS network slice comprises multiple first network elements (NEs) (at least Fig. 4; par. 78-79, eg. IMS network slice 412-1 has S-CSCF AND P-CSCF) and further comprising: receiving a network slicing identifier (ID) associated with the first network slice of the mobile network, and wherein configuring and provisioning the first IMS network slice further comprises: generating mapping configuration tables, based on the network slicing ID and the first configuration data, for the multiple first NEs of the first IMS network slice (at least paragraph 63-64; UE indicates a first IMS network slice at IMS registration. This indication is provided by including a Network Slice Identifier (NS-ID) in, e.g., the IMS registration message; par. 75: mapping rules from existing Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) network slicing information to IMS specific slices; par. 82: UE 410 sends a registration message including the NS-ID of the requested IMS network slice 412 to an appropriate P-CSCF 416 (step 500)… the mapping between the IMS network slices 412 (i.e., the NS-IDs of the IMS network slices 412) and the respective services is known to the UE 410, e.g., via configuration or via a predefined mapping hard-coded or otherwise stored at the UE 410). As per Claim 6. The method of claim 5, wherein generating the mapping configuration tables for the multiple first NEs further comprises: generating a respective mapping configuration table for each of the multiple first NEs, wherein each mapping configuration table maps the network slicing ID to one or more other NEs of an IMS service implemented by the first IMS network slice (at least paragraph 68; IMS network slices will be standardized to be usable across multiple operators, but some IMS network slices can be proprietary. To support flexibility, in some embodiments, a new Information Element (IE) is used across different domains that reflects the network slice for the used IMS session to enable the terminating domain to select the proper network slice for the target UE. This new IE is referred to herein as a Service Classifier Identifier (SC-ID). One or more NS-IDs can map into a single SC-ID. SC-IDs are standardized across domains (Network-to-Network Interface (NNI)) reflecting network slices. Note that if there is a 1-to-1 mapping between an NS-ID and an SC-ID, they are essentially the same but are labelled differently for flexibility. Note that an SC-ID has to be served by a single S-CSCF. This has to be considered during the mapping of multiple NS-IDs to one SC-ID; par. 71: Proprietary NS-IDs can map into proprietary SC-IDs; par. 114: S-CSCF 414-A sends an INVITE to an I-CSCF 418, where the INVITE includes the SC-ID determined by the S-CSCF 414-A (step 708). The I-CSCF 418 sends a query to the HSS 420 including the SC-ID (step 710). The HSS 420 locates the S-CSCF 414-B that the target UE is registered with and corresponds to the NS-ID(s) mapped to the SC-ID (step 712). The HSS 420 sends a response to the I-CSCF 418 including an S-CSCF ID of the S-CSCF 414-B located by the HSS 420). As per Claim 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the mapping configuration tables link the first network slice of the mobile network to the multiple first NEs of the first IMS network slice (at least paragraph 63-64; UE indicates a first IMS network slice at IMS registration. This indication is provided by including a Network Slice Identifier (NS-ID) in, e.g., the IMS registration message; par. 75: mapping rules from existing Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) network slicing information to IMS specific slices; par. 82: UE 410 sends a registration message including the NS-ID of the requested IMS network slice 412 to an appropriate P-CSCF 416 (step 500)… the mapping between the IMS network slices 412 (i.e., the NS-IDs of the IMS network slices 412) and the respective services is known to the UE 410, e.g., via configuration or via a predefined mapping hard-coded or otherwise stored at the UE 410). Claims 8-20 do not, in substance, add or define any additional limitations over claims 1-7 and therefore are rejected for similar reasons, supra. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is indicated in PTO form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY G TODD whose telephone number is (303)297-4763. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5 MST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor Nicholas Taylor can be reached on (571)272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY TODD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641006
Dynamic Expansion And Contraction Of Edge Clusters For Managing Access To Cloud-Based Applications
5y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12580996
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR PREDICTING DATA FOR PRECACHING AND/OR RECACHING AT A COMPUTER CACHE OF A COMPUTER ENVIRONMENT
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574347
VEHICLE NETWORK ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT
4y 9m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12556472
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PARALLELLY SENDING ROUTE ADVERTISEMENT MESSAGES
2y 8m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12513048
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING NETWORK SLICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
35%
With Interview (-4.1%)
4y 6m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 449 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month