Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/617,939

METAL DECORATION MANUFACTURING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Examiner
HOLLY, LEE A
Art Unit
3726
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
434 granted / 578 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
609
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 578 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 27 November 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sun (KR 10-1388626) as provided by (KR 10-1388626) machine translation as an English language equivalent in view of Jones (US 2019/0116409 A1). Claim 1: Sun discloses a decoration device used to fabricate a metal decoration, the decoration device comprising a plate (20) and a logo (10, 10’) of a base decoration (figs. 2-5, [0019] and [0020]), the logo (10, 10’) includes one or more letters (A C E) and comprising one or more pins (11 11’) formed on a rear surface of the logo (10, 10’) (figs. 2-5, [0020]), and the plate (20) is an intermediate medium provided with a logo accommodation portion and the logo (10, 10’) is inserted and coupled to the logo accommodation portion (figs. 10-11, [0031] and [0032] – see also annotated reproduction of fig. 8, below). The claim limitation “wherein the plate is configured to fix the logo of the base decoration separated from a protocol decoration manufactured through an injection process” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case, the plate of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. The claim limitation “the plate is provided with a logo accommodation portion configured to accommodate the logo such that the logo is inserted and coupled to the logo accommodation portion” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case the logo accommodation portion of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. The claim limitation “the plate is an intermediate medium for transplanting the logo, accommodated in the logo accommodation portion, onto a final fixation target material” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case the plate of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. The claim limitation “the plate is configured for use with a setting press machine having an upper setting press part and a lower setting worktable and with an assembly including a support mold having respective pin holes to accommodate the pins” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case the plate of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. The claim limitation “wherein, during operation, with the plate placed with its bottom surface facing upward on the lower setting worktable and with the final fixation target material placed on the bottom surface of the plate, the support mold is positioned between the upper setting press part and the lower setting worktable as the upper setting press part presses the plate so that the logo coupled to the plate is transplanted on the final fixation target material by a reaction force of a lower support portion formed in the lower setting worktable, the lower support portion being embossed with shapes corresponding to the logo; the plate is then separated and removed from the final fixation target material; and the pins protruding through the final fixation target material are finished with silicone to form a flat surface” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case the plate of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. Sun fails to disclose a pin finished with silicone. Jones discloses a pin (102) finished with silicone (figs. 1-8, [0009] and [0039]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to finish the Sun pin with silicone as taught by Jones in order to secure the pin (Jones, [0009]). See MPEP § 2143 A which describes the prima facie obviousness of combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results. Claim 2: Sun in view of Jones renders obvious the decoration device of claim 1, wherein the logo accommodation portion comprises a first logo accommodation portion for planting or transcription of a first logo formed on the base decoration and a second logo accommodation portion for planting or transcription of a second logo formed on the base decoration (see annotated reproduction of fig. 8, below). PNG media_image1.png 1219 1403 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 3: Sun discloses a decoration device used to fabricate a metal decoration, the decoration device comprising a plate (20) and a logo (10, 10’) (figs. 2-5, [0019] and [0020]), wherein the plate has a logo accommodation portion which accommodates the logo which is separated from a base decoration separated from an original protocol decoration, the logo (10, 10’) comprising one or more pins (11, 11’) formed on a rear surface of the logo, the logo accommodation portion being configured such that the logo is inserted and coupled to the logo accommodation portion (figs. 2-5, [0020]), wherein the plate is an intermediate medium for transplanting the logo, accommodated in the logo accommodation portion, onto a final fixation target material (figs. 10-11, [0031] and [0032] – see also annotated reproduction of fig. 8, below). The claim limitation “wherein the plate is configured for use with a setting press machine having an upper setting press part and a lower setting worktable and with an assembly including a support mold having respective pin holes to accommodate the pins” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case, the plate of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. The claim limitation “wherein, during operation, with the plate placed with its bottom surface facing upward on the lower setting worktable and with the final fixation target material placed on the bottom surface of the plate, the support mold is positioned between the upper setting press part and the lower setting worktable as the upper setting press part presses the plate so that the logo coupled to the plate is transplanted on the final fixation target material by a reaction force of a lower support portion formed in the lower setting worktable, the lower support portion being embossed with shapes corresponding to the logo; the plate is then separated and removed from the final fixation target material; and the pins protruding through the final fixation target material are finished with silicone to form a flat surface” is intended use, functional language. A structure is “configured to” perform a function if it includes the components and relationships necessary to perform that function, and no additional structure or modification is required. In this case, the plate of Sun includes all components and relationships necessary to perform the claimed function. Sun fails to disclose a pin finished with silicone. Jones discloses a pin (102) finished with silicone (figs. 1-8, [0009] and [0039]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to finish the Sun pin with silicone as taught by Jones in order to secure the pin (Jones, [0009]). See MPEP § 2143 A which describes the prima facie obviousness of combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results. Claim 4: Sun in view of Jones renders obvious the decoration device of claim 3, wherein the logo accommodation portion comprises a first logo accommodation portion which accommodates a first logo separated from the base decoration and a second logo accommodation portion accommodates a second logo separated from the base decoration (see annotated reproduction of fig. 8, above). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment, filed 08 November 2025, with respect to the rejection of claims 1-4 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-4 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) has been withdrawn. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Li (CN-217919326-U) discloses parts for the appearance of automobiles including logos. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lee Holly whose telephone number is (571)270-7097. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 to 5:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at (571) 272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Lee A Holly/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3726
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Nov 02, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 05, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Apr 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jul 29, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Nov 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 27, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594634
END EFFECTOR AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589454
WELDING FINISHING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583066
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOVING METAL FASTENERS EMBEDDED IN WOOD PRODUCTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576450
Workpiece Holder And Machining Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569948
METHOD FOR USING HEAT DISSIPATION PLATE MANUFACTURING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 578 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month