Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/618,301

Method for welding or additive manufacturing by laser fusion then cooling with powder inerting

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Mar 27, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2023 — FR 2303162
Examiner
ROSARIO-APONTE, ALBA T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 493 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
530
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§102
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 493 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “inerting powder being removed downstream of the application of the radiation after cooling of a melt pool produced by said application of the radiation, the laser beam being projected through the powder and focused on the material to be treated” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, the limitation “wherein the material to be treated is coated with an inerting powder, the inerting powder being removed downstream of the application of the radiation after cooling of a melt pool produced by said application of the radiation, the laser beam being projected through the powder and focused on the material to be treated” is unclear how is the material coated with an inerting powder? Is it coated while applying the laser radiation or before applying the laser radiation? how is the inerting powder removed? is it removed by laser, suction, or any other process? Is it a removal of debris or is it a removal of the entire coating? None of the figures disclose a coating, so how is the laser beam projected through the powder and focused on the material to be treated? How is the melt pool cooled? Claim 1 recites the limitation "the material" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. In claim 2, the limitation “the method for forming metallic material” is unclear since there is no previous recitation of a method for forming metallic material in claim 1. Claims 3-6 are rejected due to their dependency from claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by von der Heydt et al. (US 2022/0193820). Regarding claim 1, von der Heydt et al. teaches a method for welding two metal parts (1, 2) by fusion then cooling (abstract; para. 0055; 0073), comprising an application of laser radiation (by laser beam 6), and a progressive displacement of said laser radiation at the join between the two parts to be welded (as shown in Fig. 1 and 3), wherein the material to be treated is coated with an inerting powder (para. 0014; 0032-0033; 0069-0071; 0082), the inerting powder being removed downstream of the application of the radiation after cooling of a melt pool produced by said application of the radiation (by gas line 8), the laser beam being projected through the powder and focused on the material to be treated (as shown in Fig. 1 and 3), the parts being affixed previously with surface to be welded against surface to be welded (as shown in Fig. 1 and 3), the surfaces complementing one another (as shown in Fig. 1 and 3). Regarding claim 2, von der Heydt et al. teaches the method for forming metallic material according to claim 1, wherein characterized in that the two metal parts are of the same composition (abstract; 0042; 0055). Regarding claim 3, von der Heydt et al. teaches the method for forming metallic material according to claim 1, the material to be treated comprises a steel (abstract; 0042; 0055). Regarding claim 4, von der Heydt et al. teaches the method for forming metallic material according to claim 1, being implemented with or without an inerting box containing an inerting gas to protect the melt pool (as shown in Fig. 1 and 3). Regarding claim 5, von der Heydt et al. teaches the method for forming metallic material according to claim 1, wherein the laser beam is delivered by an Nd-YAG source (0072). Regarding claim 6, von der Heydt et al. teaches the method for forming metallic material according to claim 1, wherein the powder is deposited in the form of a smoothed flux (para. 0032-0033; 0082). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hanschmann (US 2015/0251274) is considered relevant art in the field of laser welding, as shown in Fig. 1-3, comprising an application of laser radiation (by laser beam 34), and a progressive displacement of said laser radiation at the join between the two parts (22, 24) to be welded (as shown in Fig. 3), wherein the material to be treated is coated with an inerting powder (30), the laser beam being projected through the powder and focused on the material to be treated (as shown in Fig. 3), the parts being affixed previously with surface to be welded against surface to be welded (as shown in Fig. 1-3), the surfaces complementing one another (as shown in Fig. 1-3)…but it fails to disclose wherein the inerting powder being removed downstream of the application of the radiation after cooling of a melt pool produced by said application of the radiation. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE whose telephone number is (571)272-9325. The examiner can normally be reached M to F; 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Crabb can be reached at 571-270-5095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALBA T ROSARIO-APONTE/Examiner, Art Unit 3761 09/15/2026 /ELIZABETH M KERR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746620
SINGLE-BEAM DOUBLE-PHYSICAL-EFFECT COORDINATING AND DISTRIBUTING METHOD APPLICABLE TO UNIFORM LASER SHOCK AND APPLICATION THEREOF
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728474
ARC WELDING TORCH
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12696995
BEVERAGE PREPARATION MACHINE WITH CAPSULE RECOGNITION
6y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697673
WELDING GUIDING SYSTEM PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY IMAGES
6y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696356
ELECTRIC BLANKET
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+25.2%)
3y 10m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 493 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month