Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/619,803

METHOD OF CONTROLLING A LIFT ASSEMBLY FOR A GRASS PICKUP HEADER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Examiner
WRIGHT, GIOVANNA COLLINS
Art Unit
3672
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Cnh Industrial Belgium N V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1075 granted / 1252 resolved
+33.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1280
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1252 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because reference character “14” has been used to designate both support wheels and main frame. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7,10-12,14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Pollklas et al. 7721515. Referring to claim 1, Pollkas discloses (see fig. 1) a control system for an agricultural harvester, the harvester comprising: a crop inlet for collecting crop from a pickup assembly connected to the harvester; and a lift assembly for moving the pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration, the control system comprising: a detector (20) for detecting a foreign object in the collected crop; and one or more controllers (25) configured to: receive a signal from the detector that is indicative of a foreign object in the collected crop while the pickup assembly is in the operational configuration; and control the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly away from the crop on the ground to the non-operational configuration, in dependence on the received signal (see col. 7, lines 52-63, and claims 12 and 15, after receiving signal that object is detected the pickup is automatically raised from operational to turnaround position see figure 1D, although lift device is not shown would inherently need some type of device in order to lift pickup off the ground). Referring to claim 2,Pollkas discloses the detector (20) is a metal detector (21) for detecting metallic foreign objects ( see col. 5, line 20-21). Referring to claim 3, Pollkas discloses the detector (20) is disposed at the crop inlet (9) of the harvester (see col. 5, lines 20-22). Referring to claim 4, Pollkas discloses the harvester further comprises a plurality of infeed rollers (10,11) for collecting the crop at the crop inlet; and wherein the one or more controllers are further configured to stop rotation of the infeed rollers in a collection direction in dependence on the received signal (see col. 5, lines 36-45). Referring to claim 5, Pollkas discloses the one or more controllers (25) are configured to stop rotation of the infeed rollers by operating a driver of the infeed rollers ( see col. 5, lines 35-45, rollers are driven so for quick stop to happen device driving the rollers needs to be stopped). Referring to claim 6, Pollkas discloses the one or more controllers ( 25) are further configured to raise the pickup assembly to the non-operational configuration at the same time as, or prior to, stopping rotation of the infeed rollers ( see col. 7, lines 52-col. 8, line 7). Referring to claim 7, Pollkas discloses the control system is connectable to the pickup assembly, and the one or more controllers are further configured to control the pickup assembly to stop conveying the picked-up crop toward the crop inlet of the harvester in dependence on the received signal ( see col. 5, lines 36-45) . Referring to claim 10, Pollkas discloses the one or more controllers (25) are configured to control the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly away from the crop on the ground to the non-operational configuration by lifting or tilting the pickup assembly out of contact with the crop on the ground (see fig. 1d). Referring to claim 11, Pollkas discloses an agricultural harvester (see fig. 1) comprising: a crop inlet (9) for collecting crop from a pickup assembly connected to the harvester; a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration ( although lift device is not shown but inherently need some device to lift the pickup 4 from operational to turnaround position see claim 12); and a control system according to claim 1 ( see above discussion of claim 1). Referring to claim 12, Pollkas discloses a harvesting system comprising: an agricultural harvester ( 1) comprising: a crop inlet (9) for collecting crop from a pickup assembly connected to the harvester; a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration (although lift device is not shown but inherently need some device to lift the pickup 4 from operational to turnaround position see claim 12); and a control system according to claim 1( see above discussion of claim 1); and a pickup assembly ( 4) attached to the agricultural harvester. Referring to claim 14, Pollkas discloses a method of controlling an agricultural harvester while harvesting, the agricultural harvester comprising: a crop inlet (9) for collecting crop from a pickup assembly (4) connected to the harvester; and a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration (although lift device is not shown but inherently need some device to lift the pickup 4 from operational to turnaround position see claim 12); the method comprising the steps of: detecting a foreign object in the collected crop (with detector 20) ; and controlling the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly to the non-operational configuration, away from the crop on the ground, in dependence on detecting the foreign object (see claim 12). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4,6-10,12-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Depestel et al. 20160302360 in view of Pollkas et al. 7721515. Referring to claim 1, Depestel discloses a control system for an agricultural harvester, the harvester comprising: a crop inlet for collecting crop from a pickup assembly connected to the harvester; and a lift assembly for moving the pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration, the control system comprising: a detector (27) for detecting a foreign object in the collected crop; and one or more controllers (80) configured to: receive a signal from the detector that is indicative of a foreign object in the collected crop while the pickup assembly is in the operational configuration. Depetel does not disclose the controller is configured to control a lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly away from the crop on the ground to the non-operational configuration, in dependence on the received signal. Pollkas teaches a harvester with a controller (25) configured to control the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly away from the crop on the ground to the non-operational configuration, in dependence on the received signal (see col. 7, lines 52-63, and claims 12 and 15, after receiving signal that object is detected the pickup is automatically raised from operational to turnaround position see figure 1D, although lift device is not shown would inherently need some type of device to lift pickup off the ground). Pollkas further teaches the lifting helps to prevent crop material does not pile up (see col. 7, lines 52-60). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify the control system disclosed by Depestel to have the controller to control a lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly away from the crop on the ground to the non-operational configuration, in dependence on the received signal in view of the teachings of Pollkas with a reasonable expectation of success in order to ensure crop material does not pile up. Referring to claim 2, Depestel discloses the detector (27) is a metal detector for detecting metallic foreign objects ( see paragraph 0034). Referring to claim 3, Depestel discloses the detector (27) is disposed at the crop inlet (21) of the harvester. Referring to claim 4, Depestel discloses the harvester further comprises a plurality of infeed rollers (22) for collecting the crop at the crop inlet; and wherein the one or more controllers are further configured to stop rotation of the infeed rollers in a collection direction in dependence on the received signal (see paragraph 0037). Referring to claim 6, Pollkas teaches the one or more controllers ( 85) are further configured to raise the pickup assembly to the non-operational configuration at the same time as, or prior to, stopping rotation of the infeed rollers ( see col. 7, lines 52-col. 8, line 7). Referring to claim 7, Depestal discloses the control system is connectable to the pickup assembly, and the one or more controllers are further configured to control the pickup assembly to stop conveying the picked-up crop toward the crop inlet of the harvester in dependence on the received signal (see paragraph 0037-0038). Referring to claim 8, Depestal discloses the pickup assembly includes: a reel (11) with pickup tines operable to pick up crop from the ground during active rotation of the reel; and an auger (12) operable to transport the picked-up crop to the crop inlet, wherein the infeed rollers (22) collect the picked-up crop. Pollkas teaches the control system is configured to control the lift assembly to raise the reel of the pickup assembly out of contact with the crop on the ground in the non-operational configuration (see col. 7, lines 52-63 and claim 12). Referring to claim 9, Depestel discloses the pickup assembly further includes a driver (60) operable to rotate the reel in a pick-up direction and the auger in a collection direction for picking up and transporting the crop; and wherein the one or more controllers are further to stop conveying the collected crop toward the crop inlet by controlling the driver to stop rotation of the reel in the pickup direction or the auger in the collection direction (see paragraph 0038). Referring to claim 10, Pollkas teaches the one or more controllers (25) are configured to control the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly away from the crop on the ground to the non-operational configuration by lifting or tilting the pickup assembly out of contact with the crop on the ground (see fig. 1d). Referring to claim 12, Depestel discloses a harvesting system comprising: an agricultural harvester comprising: a crop inlet (21) for collecting crop from a pickup assembly connected to the harvester and a pickup assembly (10) attached to the agricultural harvester. Depestal does not disclose a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration; and a control system according to claim 1. Pollkas teaches a harvesting system comprising: an agricultural harvester ( 1) having a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration (although lift device is not shown but inherently need some device to lift the pickup 4 from operational to turnaround position see claim 12); and a control system according to claim 1( see above discussion of claim 1). Pollkas further teaches use a lift assembly attached to a pickup assembly helps to prevent crop material does not pile up (see col. 7, lines 52-60). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify to modify the system disclosed by Depestel to have a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration; and a control system according to claim 1 in view of the teachings of Pollkas, with a reasonable expectation of success in order to ensure crop material does not pile up. Referring to claim 13, Depestel discloses the pickup assembly comprises: a pickup assembly frame; a reel (11) carried by the pickup assembly frame and configured to pick up crop from the ground; and a feeding auger (12) configured to receive the crop from the reel and to convey the crop towards a crop inlet of the agricultural harvester. Referring to claim 14, Depestel discloses a method of controlling an agricultural harvester while harvesting, the agricultural harvester comprising: a crop inlet (21) for collecting crop from a pickup assembly (10) connected to the harvester; and the method comprising the steps of: detecting a foreign object in the collected crop ( with detector 27). Depestel does not disclose a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration; and controlling the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly to the non-operational configuration, away from the crop on the ground, in dependence on detecting the foreign object. Pollkas teaches a harvesting system comprising: an agricultural harvester ( 1) having a lift assembly for moving the connected pickup assembly from an operational configuration, in which the pickup assembly is operable to pick up crop from the ground and to convey the picked-up crop to the crop inlet of the harvester, to a non-operational configuration (although lift device is not shown but inherently need some device to lift the pickup 4 from operational to turnaround position see claim 12); and controlling the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly to the non-operational configuration, away from the crop on the ground, in dependence on detecting the foreign object (see col. 7, lines 52-63 and claim 12). Pollkas further teaches use a lift assembly attached to a pickup assembly helps to prevent crop material does not pile up (see col. 7, lines 52-60). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to modify to modify the method disclosed by Depestel to have a lift assembly and controlling the lift assembly to raise the pickup assembly to the non-operational configuration, away from the crop on the ground, in dependence on detecting the foreign object in view of the teachings of Pollkas, with a reasonable expectation of success in order to ensure crop material does not pile up. Referring to claim 15, Depestel discloses the steps of: picking up the crop from the ground by a reel ( 11) of the pickup assembly with pick-up tines; transporting the picked-up crop by an auger (12) of the pickup assembly to the crop inlet of the agricultural harvester; collecting the transported crop by infeed rollers (22) of the agricultural harvester; and in dependence on detecting the foreign object, stopping one or more of: collecting the transported crop by the infeed rollers; picking up crop from the ground by the reel; and transporting the picked-up crop by the auger to the crop inlet (see paragraph 0037-0038). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GIOVANNA WRIGHT whose telephone number is (571)272-7027. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 am- 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicole Coy can be reached at (571) 272-5405. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Giovanna Wright/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3672
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601223
DRILLING ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595703
PULLBACK SYSTEM FOR DRILLING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590514
System for Hydraulically Expanding a Liner Hanger
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590503
WELLBORE BALANCED PRESSURE COMPENSATION FOR ROTATING CONTROL DEVICE (RCD) ROTARY SEALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584385
LARGE SHAPED CHARGE PERFORATION TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1252 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month