Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/620,242

Metal Detector

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Mar 31, 2023 — AU 2023900922
Examiner
DO, AN H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Minelab Electronics Pty Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1322 granted / 1461 resolved
+30.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1474
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§103
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§102
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1461 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Candy (US 10,078,148). Candy discloses the following claimed features: Regarding claims 1 and 13, a method for reducing false positives of a metal detector (Figures 1-5) in detecting a target, comprising the steps of: transmitting a transmit magnetic field (24); receiving a receive magnetic field to produce a receive signal (25); processing the receive signal using at least two different functions to produce a first signal and a second signal (26); the at least two different functions are configured such that the first signal is sensitive to at least one characteristic of the target, and such that the second signal is a representation of a likelihood function of the first signal (Figures 4 and 5; column 8, line 40 to column 11, line 41), the representation of the likelihood function taking into consideration an effect of an environment upon the first signal (27); classifying the receive signal into a classification of one of at least three possible classes based on at least the second signal (28); and producing an indicator output signal based on the classification, wherein the indicator output signal is different for different classifications; the indicator output signal comprising an audio signal (29). Regarding claim 2, wherein the audio signal includes tones of different pitches for different classes (column 6, lines 22-59). Regarding claim 3, wherein the audio signal is not emitted for a particular class (column 6, lines 22-59). Regarding claim 4, wherein the at least one characteristic of the target is related to the magnetic polarizability of the target (column 6, lines 22-59). Regarding claim 5, wherein the indicator output is a numeric indicator denoting the at least one characteristic of the target (column 6, lines 40-59). Regarding claim 6, wherein the second signal is used to predict the variability of the first signal due to the effect of the environment (column 7, lines 12-59). Regarding claim 7, wherein the indicator output signal is further indicative of a classification uncertainty in identifying a group to which the target belongs (column 7, lines 12-59). Regarding claim 8, wherein producing the second signal comprises combining information from the receive signal prior to detecting the target with information from the receive signal associated with detecting the target (column 7, lines 12-59). Regarding claim 9, wherein combining the information from the receive signal prior to detecting the target with information from the receive signal associated with detecting the target comprises calculating a measure of noise in a component of the receive signal prior to detecting the target and inferring the noise in the first signal that is sensitive to an identity of the target, assuming that a similar level of noise is present in the receive signal associated with detecting the target (Figure 4; column 8, line 8 to column 9, line 20). Regarding claim 10, wherein the component of the receive signal prior to detecting the target is sensitive to the soil (column 4, lines 4-54). Regarding claim 11, wherein the component of the receive signal prior to detecting the target is sensitive to seawater (column 4, lines 4-54). Regarding claim 12, wherein the component of the receive signal prior to detecting the target is sensitive to electromagnetic interference (column 6, lines 46-51). Regarding claim 14, a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions (column 12, line 44 to column 13, line 3). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AN H DO whose telephone number is (571)272-2143. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 7:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricardo Magallanes can be reached on 571-272-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AN H DO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748033
Methods for Group-Wise Cytometry Data Analysis and Systems for Same
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742702
Internal Combustion Engine Control Device
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737656
DOUBLY CONTROLLED iX CIRCUIT
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736943
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736578
DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF IGBT MODULES
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1461 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month